Abstract
How is devotion (bhakti) related to knowledge (jñāna)? Does one lead to the other? Do they correspond to different paths for different people? Commentators on the Bhagavad-Gītā have debated these questions for centuries. In this essay I will suggest, as many Indian commentators have, that the paths of devotion and knowledge described in the Gītā can be harmonized. I will not draw from Indian texts, however, but from a suggestive parallel in the history of Chinese religions: namely, the development of a tradition of “dual cultivation” of Pure Land and Chan 禪. I will focus in particular on the works of Yunqi Zhuhong 雲棲祩宏 (1535–1615) and his use of the distinction between principle (li 理) and phenomenon (shi 事) to reconcile seemingly divergent religious paths. I will conclude by considering the implications of this synthesis for nondualist interpretations of the Gītā.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ādidevānanda, Svāmī, trans. 1991. Śrī Rāmānuja Gītā Bhāṣya. Madras: Sri Ramakrishna Math.
Brook, Timothy. 2005. “Institution.” In Critical Terms for the Study of Buddhism, edited by Donald S. Lopez, Jr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chan, Wing-tsit, trans. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chappell, David W. 1996. “The Formation of the Pure Land Movement in China: Tao-ch’o and Shan-tao.” In The Pure Land Tradition: History and Development, edited by James Foard, Michael Solomon, and Richard K. Payne. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Buddhist Studies Series.
Cleary, J. C., trans. 1992. Meditating with Koans. Berkeley, CA: Asian Humanities Press.
_____, trans. 1994. Pure Land, Pure Mind: The Buddhism of Masters Chu-hung and Tsung-pen. New York: Sutra Translation Committee of the United States and Canada.
Cook, Francis H. 1977. Hua-yen Buddhism: The Jewel Net of Indra. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Dimock, Edward C., Jr., and Tony K. Stewart, trans. 1999. Caitanya Caritāmṛta of Kṛṣṇadāsa Kavirāja. Cambridge, MA: Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University.
Edgerton, Franklin. 1924. “The Meaning of Sānkhya and Yoga.” American Journal of Philology 45.1: 1–46.
Fujita, Kōtatsu. 1996. “Pure Land Buddhism in India,” trans. by Taitetsu Unno. In The Pure Land Tradition: History and Development, edited by James Foard, Michael Solomon, and Richard K. Payne. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Buddhist Studies Series.
Gambhīrānanda, Swāmī, trans. 1995. Bhagavadgītā, with the Commentary of Śaṅkarācārya. Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama.
_____, trans. 1998. Bhagavad-gītā, with the Annotation Gūḍhārtha-Dīpikā by Madhusūdana Sarasvati. Kolkata: Advaita Ashrama.
Godman, David, ed. 1985. Be As You Are: The Teachings of Sri Ramana Maharshi. New York: Arkana.
Gupta, Sanjukta. 2006. Advaita Vedānta and Vaiṣṇavism: The Philosophy of Madhusūdana Sarasvatī. London & New York: Routledge.
Hurvitz, Leon. 1970. “Chu-hung’s One Mind of Pure Land and Ch’an Buddhism.” In Self and Society in Ming Thought, edited by Wm. Theodore de Bary. New York & London: Columbia University Press.
Inagaki, Hisao, and Harold Stewart, trans. 1995. The Three Pure Land Sutras. Berkeley, CA: Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research.
Ingram, Paul O. 1973. “The Zen Critique of Pure Land Buddhism.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 41.2: 184–200.
Lusthaus, Dan. 1998. “Buddhist Philosophy, Chinese.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. Craig, vol. 2. London: Routledge.
Madhavananda, Swami, trans. 2005. Uddhava Gita, or The Last Message of Sri Krishna: Text with English Translation and Notes. Kolkata: Advaita Ashrama.
Marcaurelle, Roger. 2000. Freedom through Inner Renunciation: Śaṅkara’s Philosophy in a New Light. Albany: SUNY.
Minor, Robert N., ed. 1986. Modern Indian Interpreters of the Bhagavadgita. Albany: SUNY.
Miura, Isshū, and Ruth Fuller Sasaki. 1966. Zen Dust: The History of the Koan and Koan Study in Rinzai (Lin-chi) Zen. Kyoto: First Zen Institute of America in Japan.
Nelson, Lance. 1988. “Madhusudana Sarasvati on the ‘Hidden Meaning’ of the Bhagavadgītā: Bhakti for the Advaitin Renunciate.” Journal of South Asian Literature 23.2: 73–89.
Nikhilananda, Swami, ed. 1953. Vivekananda: The Yogas and Other Works. New York: Ramakrishna-Vivekananda Center.
_____, trans. 1992. The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna. New York: Ramakrishna-Vivekananda Center.
Pradhān, V. G., trans. 1987. Jnāneshvari [Bhāvārthadipikā], edited by H. M. Lambert. Albany: SUNY.
Sargeant, Winthrop, trans. 1994. The Bhagavad Gītā, edited by Christopher Chapple. Albany: SUNY.
Sharf, Robert H. 2002. “On Pure Land Buddhism and Ch’an/Pure Land Syncretism in Medieval China.” T’oung Pao (second series) 88.4/5: 282–331.
Sharma, Arvind. 1986. The Hindu Gītā: Ancient and Classical Interpretations of the Bhagavadgītā. London: Duckworth.
Sprung, Mervyn, ed. 1973. The Problem of Two Truths in Buddhism and Vedānta. Dordrecht & Boston: D. Reidel.
Suzuki, D. T. 1933. Essays in Zen Buddhism (Second Series). London: Luzac and Company.
Welch, Holmes. 1967. The Practice of Chinese Buddhism, 1900–1950. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yü, Chün-fang. 1981. The Renewal of Buddhism in China: Chu-hung and the Late Ming Synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, M.S. Knowledge and Devotion in the Bhagavad-Gītā: A Suggestive Parallel from Chinese Buddhism. Dao 13, 39–51 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9356-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9356-8