Skip to main content
Log in

The Virtues, Moral Inwardness, and the Challenge of Modernity

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Angle, Stephen C. 2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angle, Stephen C. 2011. “Reply to Justin Tiwald.” Dao 10: 237-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billioud, Sébastien. 2011. Thinking Through Confucian Modernity: A Study of M ou Zongsan’s Moral Metaphysics. Leiden, Boston: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, Kim-chong 莊錦章. 2012. “Review of Angle 2009.” Philosophy and Culture 哲學與文化 39.2: 121-135.

  • Cline, Erin M. 2010. “Review of Angle 2009.” Ethics 120.4: 826-831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2002. Ethics in the Confucian Tradition: The Thought of Mencius and W ang Yangming. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuji, Michiaki 藤井倫明. 2011. An Investigation into the Structure of Z hu Xi’s Thought, With a Particular Focus on the Concept of li 朱熹思想結構探索—以「理」為考察中心. Taipei: Taida Chuban Zhongxin.

  • Kim, Yung Sik. 2000. The Natural Philosophy of C hu Hsi (1130-1200). Philadelphia: Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Chan. 2010. “Zhu Xi on Moral Motivation: An Alternative Critique.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37.4: 622–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Ming-huei 李明輝. 1997. Confucians and Kant 儒家與康德. Taipei: Lianjing.

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mou, Zongsan 牟宗三. 1968-69. Constitutive Heart-Mind and Nature 心體與性體, 3 vols. Taipei: Zhengzhong Shuju.

  • _____. 1985. Treatise on the Summum Bonum 圓善論. Taipei: Taiwan Xuesheng Shuju.

  • Murdoch, Iris. 2001. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge (originally 1970).

  • Neville, Robert Cummings. 2011. “Review of Angle 2009.” The Review of Metaphysics 64(3): 623–625.

  • Roberts, Robert C. 1995. “Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein, and a Method of ‘Virtue Ethics’.” In Kierkegaard in Post/Modernity. Edited by Martin J. Matustik and Merold Westphal. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Stephan. 2011. “Mou Zongsan, Hegel, and Kant: The Quest for Confucian Modernity.” Philosophy East and West 61.2: 260–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanton, Christine. 2003. Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taiwan Philosophical Association. 2012. “Roundtable: Should the Four Books Become Required Reading? Another Controversy” 台哲會論壇/《四書》應該必讀嗎?──又一次爭議, Thought 思想 21: 235–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Kirill O. 1988. “Li and Yi as Immanent: Chu Hsi’s Thought in Practical Perspective.” Philosophy East and West 38.1: 30-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwald, Justin. 2011a. “Review of Angle 2009.” Dao 10: 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwald, Justin. 2011b. “Reply to Stephen Angle.” Dao 10: 241–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan W. 2010. “Review of Angle 2009.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.

  • Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 1983. Collected Annotations and Commentaries on the Four Books 四書章句集注. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Marchal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchal, K. The Virtues, Moral Inwardness, and the Challenge of Modernity. Dao 12, 369–380 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9339-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9339-9

Keywords

Navigation