Abstract
The moral commonly drawn from Zhuangzi’s butterfly dream is that there is no distinction between the subjectivity of the dreamer and the awake. It is, however, tenuous to incorporate this insight into an overall view of Zhuangzi, whether as a perspectival relativist, a mystic, or an anti-rationalist, just to name the more popular positions. The parable, despite its brevity and clarity, is difficult because the assertion about metaphysical distinction in the last two lines does not cohere with the preceding text about knowledge. To cope with this problem, there are recent interpretations that advocate textual revision or adumbrate a non-skeptical Zhuangzi. In this article, I shall evaluate these strategies and explain the discrepancy in understanding the butterfly dream. Besides employing the concept of self-locating belief to account for the paradox of waking and not-knowing, I shall also argue for an epistemic grounding of the metaphysical distinction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allinson, Robert. 1988. “A Logical Reconstruction of the Butterfly Dream: The Case for Internal Textual Transformation.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 15.3: 319–339.
_____. 1989. Chuang-Tzu for Spiritual Transformation. New York: State University of New York Press.
Elga, Adam. 2000. “Self-locating Belief and the Sleeping Beauty Problem.” Analysis 60.2: 143–147.
Giles, Herbert A. 1926. C huang Tzu: Taoist Philosopher and Chinese Mystic. London: Allen and Unwin.
Graham, Angus C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao. Chicago: Open Court.
_____. 2001. C huang Tzu: The Inner Chapters. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Guo, Xiang 郭象, annotator, 2002. Zhunagzi 莊子. Shanghai上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.
Hansen, Chad. 1983. “A Tao of Tao in Chuang-tzu.” In Experimental Essays on Chuang-tzu, edited by Victor H. Mair. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1993. “Zhuangzi on Skepticism, Skill, and the Ineffable Dao.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 61.4: 639–654.
Kjellberg, Paul & Philip J. Ivanhoe, eds. 1996. Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi. New York: SUNY.
Lee, Jung H. 2007. “What Is It Like to Be a Butterfly? A Philosophical Interpretation of Zhuangzi’s Butterfly Dream.” Asian Philosophy 17.2: 185–202.
Lewis, David. 1979. “Attitude de dicto and Attitude de se.” Philosophical Review 88.4: 513–543.
_____. 2001a. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
_____. 2001b. “Sleeping Beauty: Reply to Elga.” Analysis 61.3: 171–176.
McGinn, Colin. 2006. Mindsight: Image, Dream, Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Möller, Hans-Georg. 1999. “Zhuangzi’s Dream of the Butterfly—A Daoist Interpretation.” Philosophy East and West 49.4: 439–450.
Nagel, Thomas. 1974. “What It Is Like to Be a Bat?” Philosophical Review 83.4: 435–450.
Stanley, Jason & Timothy Williamson. 2001. “Knowing How.” Journal of Philosophy 98.8: 411–444.
Watson, Burton. 1968. The Complete Works of C huang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.
Yang, Xiaomei. 2005. “Great Dream and Great Awakening: Interpreting the Butterfly Dream Story.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 4.2: 253–266.
Ziporyn, Brook. 2003. The Penumbra Unbound: The Neo-Taoist Philosophy of G uo Xiang. New York: SUNY.
_____. 2009. Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings with Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ming, T. Sleeping Beauty and the Dreaming Butterfly: What Did Zhuangzi Doubt About?. Dao 11, 497–512 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-012-9295-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-012-9295-9