Skip to main content
Log in

Aseismic smart building isolation systems under multi-level earthquake excitations: Part II, energy-dissipation and damage reduction

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the performance results of the previously suggested smart building isolation systems (1st companion paper), this following study verifies the control effects of the systems from the view point of energy dissipation and damage level metrics. Several different model cases of the strategically isolated multi-story building structures utilizing passive dampers and semi-active resettable devices are analyzed and the energy-based target indices are compared. Performance comparisons are conducted on statistically calculated story/structural hysteretic energy and story/structural damage demands over realistic suites of earthquake ground motion records, representing seismic excitations of specific return period probability. Again, the semi-active solutions show significant promise for applications of resettable device, offering advantages over passive systems in the consistent damage reductions. The specific results of this study include the identification of differences in the mechanisms by which smart building isolation systems remove energy, based on the differences in the devices used. Less variability is also seen for the semi-active isolation systems, indicating an increased robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCabe S L, Hall W J. Damage and reserve capacity evaluation of structures subjected to strong earthquake ground motion. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Madrid, Spain, 1992, 3653–3658

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akiyama H. Earthquake Resistant Limit-State Design for Buildings. University of Tokyo Press, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leelataviwat S, Goel S C, Stojadinovic B. Toward performancebased seismic design of structures. Earthquake Spectra, 1999, 15(3): 435–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zahrah T, Hall J. Earthquake energy absorption in SDOF structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1984, 110(8): 1757–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fajfar P, Fischinger M. A seismic procedure including energy concept. In: Proceedings of IX ECEE. Moscow, 1990, 312–321

    Google Scholar 

  6. Uang C M, Bertero V V. Evaluation of seismic energy in structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1990, 19(1): 77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chey M H, Chase J G, Mander J B, Carr A J. Semi-active tuned mass damper building systems: Design. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2010, 39(2): 119–139

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chey M H, Chase J G, Mander J B, Carr A J. Semi-active tuned mass damper building systems: Application. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2010, 39(1): 69–89

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chey M H, Chase J G, Mander J B, Carr A J. Innovative seismic retrofitting strategy of added stories isolation system. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2013, 7(1): 13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frankel A, Mueller C, Perkins D, Barnhard T, Leyendecker E, Safak E, Hanson S, Dickman N, Hopper M. New USGS seismic hazard maps for the United States. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction. Washington, DC, USA, 1996, 173–174

    Google Scholar 

  11. Otani S. Hysteresis models of reinforced concrete for earthquake response analysis. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo, 1981, 34(3): 407–441

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Carr A J. “RUAUMOKO” Computer Program Library. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carr A J, Tabuchi M. The Structural Ductility and the Damage Index for Reinforced Concrete Structure under Seismic Excitation. In: Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Structural Dynamics: EURODYN'93. 1993, 1: 169–176

    Google Scholar 

  14. Park Y J, Ang A H S. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1985, 111(4): 722–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park Y J, Ang A H S, Wen Y K. Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1985, 111(4): 740–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Charng P H. Base isolation for multistorey building structures. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Christchurch: University of Canterbury, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mørk K J. Stochastic analysis of reinforced concrete frames under seismic excitation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1992, 11(3): 145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nielsen S R K, Koyluoglu H U, Calmak A S. One and twodimensional maximum softening damage indicators for reinforced concrete structures under seismic excitation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1992, 11(8): 435–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. DiPasquale E, Cakmak A S. Seismic damage assessment using linear models. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1990, 9(4): 194–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stefanou G, Fragiadakis M. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of frames with stochastic non-Gaussian material properties. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(8): 1841–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Ho Chey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chey, MH., Chase, J.G., Mander, J.B. et al. Aseismic smart building isolation systems under multi-level earthquake excitations: Part II, energy-dissipation and damage reduction. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 9, 297–306 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-015-0308-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-015-0308-8

Keywords

Navigation