Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intranasal Nicotine Increases Postoperative Nausea and is Ineffective in Reducing Pain Following Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery in Tobacco-Naïve Females: A Randomized, Double Blind Trial

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 July 2015

Abstract

Background

Nicotine is a known analgesic. Our primary aim was to test the hypothesis that intranasal nicotine administered intraoperatively reduces the need for postoperative opioids. The secondary outcomes included evaluation of both postoperative pain and nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Material and Methods

Nonsmoking female patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric operations were randomized to receive either 3 mg intranasal nicotine (N = 42) or placebo spray (N = 47) at the conclusion of surgery. Postoperative opioid use converted to intravenous morphine equivalents (iv MEQ) and PONV rates were recorded during both the recovery room postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and the first 24 postoperative hours. All patients received multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis.

Results

Total iv MEQ were not significantly reduced during the PACU stay in patients receiving nicotine (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 5.3 [0, 10.0] mg for nicotine vs. 5.2 [0, 12.7] mg for placebo, one-tailed P = 0.414) or for the first 24 h following PACU discharge (39.6 [20.0, 52.5] mg for nicotine vs. 32.7 [20.3, 51.3] mg for placebo, one-tailed P = 0.752). For the combined period (PACU + 24-h post-PACU discharge), iv MEQ were 45.8 [27.0, 58.6] mg for nicotine and 39.4 [23.5, 60.0] mg for placebo, one-tailed P = 0.801. Compared to placebo, a higher percentage of patients administered nicotine received antiemetics in the PACU (57.1 vs. 25.5 %, P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Intraoperative intranasal nicotine did not exhibit opioid-sparing effect in nonsmoking bariatric female patients. Despite antiemetic prophylaxis, the use of nicotine was associated with the higher frequency of the use of rescue antiemetics in PACU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weingarten TN, Flores AS, McKenzie JA, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea and perioperative complications in bariatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:131–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng SS, Yeh J, Flood P. Anesthesia matters: patients anesthetized with propofol have less postoperative pain than those anesthetized with isoflurane. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Flood P, Daniel D. Intranasal nicotine for postoperative pain treatment. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:1417–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Habib AS, White WD, El Gasim MA, et al. Transdermal nicotine for analgesia after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:999–1004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hong D, Conell-Price J, Cheng S, et al. Transdermal nicotine patch for postoperative pain management: a pilot dose-ranging study. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1005–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Olson LC, Hong D, Conell-Price JS, et al. A transdermal nicotine patch is not effective for postoperative pain management in smokers: a pilot dose-ranging study. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1987–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Turan A, White PF, Koyuncu O, et al. Transdermal nicotine patch failed to improve postoperative pain management. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1011–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jankowski CJ, Weingarten TN, Martin DP, et al. Randomised trial of intranasal nicotine and postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting in non-smoking women. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28:585–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jamner LD, Girdler SS, Shapiro D, et al. Pain inhibition, nicotine, and gender. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998;6:96–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fishbein L, O’Brien P, Hutson A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of nicotine nasal spray devices on cardiovascular and pulmonary function. J Investig Med. 2000;48:435–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (redcap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Management of cancer pain; clinical practice guideline number 9. Agency for health care policy and research publication no. 94–0592, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1994.

  13. Principles of analgesic use in the treatment of acute pain and cancer pain, ed 4th edition. Skokie, Illinois, American Pain Society, 1999.

  14. Anderson KL, Pinkerton KE, Uyeminami D, et al. Antinociception induced by chronic exposure of rats to cigarette smoke. Neurosci Lett. 2004;366:86–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Simons CT, Cuellar JM, Moore JA, et al. Nicotinic receptor involvement in antinociception induced by exposure to cigarette smoke. Neurosci Lett. 2005;389:71–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mousa SA, Aloyo VJ, Van Loon GR. Tolerance to tobacco smoke- and nicotine-induced analgesia in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1988;31:265–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pauli P, Rau H, Zhuang P, et al. Effects of smoking on thermal pain threshold in deprived and minimally-deprived habitual smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993;111:472–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Knott VJ. Effects of cigarette smoking on subjective and brain evoked responses to electrical pain stimulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990;35:341–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shiffman S, Jarvik ME. Cigarette smoking, physiological arousal, and emotional response: Nesbitt’s paradox re-examined. Addict Behav. 1984;9:95–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sillvete D, Hoff EC, Larson PS, et al. The actions of nicotine on central nervous system functions. Pharmacol Rev. 1962;14:137–73.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chandrakantan A, Glass PS. Multimodal therapies for postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pain. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107 Suppl 1:i27–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sutherland G, Russell MA, Stapleton J, et al. Nasal nicotine spray: a rapid nicotine delivery system. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992;108:512–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the multiple contributions of the Mayo Clinic staff, residents, and nurses in the Departments of Anesthesiology and the Division of General Surgery. We are also grateful to Ms. Laurie Meade, study coordinator, Anesthesia Clinical Research Unit.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Toby N. Weingarten or Juraj Sprung.

Additional information

Financial Support

Intramural grant from the Mayo Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weingarten, T.N., McGlinch, B.P., Liedl, L. et al. Intranasal Nicotine Increases Postoperative Nausea and is Ineffective in Reducing Pain Following Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery in Tobacco-Naïve Females: A Randomized, Double Blind Trial. OBES SURG 25, 506–513 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1431-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1431-7

Keywords

Navigation