Skip to main content
Log in

Ant-Repelling Pollinators of the Myrmecophytic Macaranga winkleri (Euphorbiaceae)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many plants have mutualistic relationships with ants, whereby plants provide food and/or nesting sites for the symbiotic ants, and in turn the ants protect the host plants by excluding herbivores. While the ants are useful as guards, they may negatively affect host reproduction by excluding pollinators. Here we studied this potential conflict in the myrmecophytic Macaranga winkleri pollinated by the thrips Dolichothrips fialae. Behavioural responses of ant guards to pollinator thrips and their chemicals, and related chemical analyses, provide evidence that thrips deter ant-guards by secreting droplets containing ant-repelling n-decanoic acid from their anuses. This is the first report of insect pollinators repelling their host’s symbiotic guard ants to perform pollination. This is a novel strategy by which a plant host avoids interference with pollination by ant-guards in an ant–plant mutualism. The acquisition of a pollination system that is resistant to ant attacks may have facilitated the evolution of myrmecophytes in the genus Macaranga.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, V. M., & Rastogi, N. (2008). Role of floral repellents in the regulation of flower visits of extrafloral nectary-visiting ants in an Indian crop plant. Ecological Entomology, 33, 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster, W. S. (1997). Exaptations link evolution of plant–herbivore and plant–pollinator interactions: a phylogenetic inquiry. Ecology, 78(6), 1661–1672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bänfer, G., Fiala, B., & Weising, K. (2004). AFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships among myrmecophytic species of Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae) and their allies. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 249, 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattner, F. R., Weising, K., Bänfer, G., Maschwitz, U., & Fiala, B. (2001). Molecular analysis of phylogenetic relationships among myrmecophytic Macaranga species (Euphorbiaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 19(3), 331–344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. J., & Ashton, P. S. (1999). Phenology and fecundity in 11 sympatic pioneer species of Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae) in Borneo. American Journal of Botany, 86(12), 1786–1795.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. J., Lum, S. K. Y., Chan, R., & Wang, L. K. (2001). Evolution of myrmecophytism in western Malesian Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae). Evolution, 55(8), 1542–1559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Facci, M., Wang, H.-L., Yuvaraj, J. K., Dublon, I. A. N., Svensson, G. P., Chapman, T. W., et al. (2014). Chemical composition of anal droplets of the eusocial gall-inducing thrips Kladothrips intermedius. Chemoecology, 24(3), 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger, P., & Swarm, L. A. (1978). How common are ant-repellent nectars? Biotropica, 10, 238–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiala, B., Jakob, A., Maschwitz, U., & Linsenmair, K. E. (1999). Diversity, evolutionary specialization and geographic distribution of a mutualistic ant–plant complex: Macaranga and Crematogaster in South East Asia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 66, 305–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiala, B., Maschwitz, U., Pong, T. Y., & Helbig, A. J. (1989). Studies of a South East Asian ant–plant association: protection of Macaranga trees by Crematogaster borneensis. Oecologia, 79, 463–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiala, B., Meyer, U., Hashim, R., & Maschwitz, U. (2011). Pollination systems in pioneer trees of the genus Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae) in Malaysian rainforests. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 103, 935–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galen, C. (2005). Catching ants with honey: an experimental test of distraction and satiation as alternative modes of escape from flower-damaging ants. Oecologia, 144, 80–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galen, C., Sherry, R. A., & Carroll, A. B. (1999). Are flowers physiological sinks or faucets? Costs and correlates of water use by flowers of Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia, 118, 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazoul, J. (2001). Can floral repellents pre-empt potential ant–plant conflicts? Ecology Letters, 4, 295–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant, E. O., & Fielder, P. L. (1981). Flower defenses against nectar-pilferage by ants. Biotropica, 13(Supplemental), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, R. (1991). The greasy pole syndrome. In C. R. Huxley & D. F. Cutler (Eds.), Ant–plant interactions (pp. 430–433). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. N., Chamberlain, S. A., & Miller, T. E. X. (2011). Consequences of ants and extrafloral nectar for a pollinating seed-consuming mutualism: ant satiation, floral distraction or plant defense? Oikos, 120, 381–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inui, Y., Shimizu-kaya, U., Okubo, T., Yamsaki, E., & Itioka, T. (2015). Various chemical strategies to deceive ants in three Arhopala species (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) exploiting Macaranga myrmecophytes. PLoS One, 10(4), e0120652.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Itioka, T., Nomura, M., Inui, Y., Itino, T., & Inoue, T. (2000). Difference in intensity of ant defense among three species of Macaranga myrmecophytes in a Southeast Asian dipterocarp forest. Biotropica, 32, 318–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker, R. R., & Blüthgen, N. (2008). Floral scents repel potentially nectar-thieving ants. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 10, 295–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker, R., Chung, A. Y. C., & Blüthgen, N. (2007). Interaction between flowers, ants and pollinators: additional evidence for floral repellence against ants. Ecological Research, 22, 665–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens, A., Dötterl, S., & Meve, U. (2006). The chemical nature of fetid floral odours in stapeliads (Apocynaceae–Asclepiadoideae–Ceropegieae). New Phytologist, 172, 452–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moog, U., Fiala, B., Federle, W., & Maschwitz, U. (2002). Thrips pollination of the dioecious ant plant Macaranga hullettii (Euphorbiaceae) in Southeast Asia. American Journal of Botany, 89(1), 50–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mound, L. A., & Okajima, S. (2015). Taxonomic studies on Dolichothrips (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripinae), pollinators of Macaranga trees in Southeast Asia (Euphorbiaceae). Zootaxa, 3956(1), 79–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ness, J. H. (2006). A mutualism’s indirect costs: the most aggressive plant bodyguards also deter pollinators. Oikos, 113, 506–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino, J. A., Márquez, E., Quijano, C. E., & Castro, D. (2010). Volatile compounds in noni (Morinda citrifolia L.) at two ripening stages. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 30(1), 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Version 3.2.2. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, N. E., Willmer, P., & Stone, G. N. (2002). Spatial structuring and floral avoidance behavior prevent ant–pollinator conflict in a Mexican ant-acacia. Ecology, 83(11), 3086–3096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Gray, V., & Oliveira, P. S. (2007). The ecology and evolution of ant–plant interactions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W., Sakai, S., & Karim, A. A. H. (2005). Pollination ecology and the rain forest: Sarawak studies. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salles, H. C., Volsi, E. C. F. R., Marques, M. R., Souza, B. M., dos Santos, L. D., Tormena, C. F., et al. (2006). The venomous secrets of the web droplets from the viscid spiral of the orb-weaver spider Nephila clavipes (Araneae, Tetragnatidae). Chemistry & Biodiversity, 3, 727–741.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steidle, J. L. M., & Dettner, K. (1995). The chemistry of the abdominal gland secretion of six species of the rove beetle genus Bledius. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 23(7–8), 757–765.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, T., Haga, K., Tsutsumi, T., & Matsuyama, S. (2004). Analysis of anal secretions from Phlaeothripine thrips. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 30(2), 409–423.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torto, B., Njagi, P. G. N., Hassanali, A., & Amiani, H. (1996). Aggregation pheromone system of nymphal gregarious desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forskål). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 22(12), 2273–2281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji, K., Hasyim, A., & Nakamura, K. (2004). Asian weaver ants, Oecophylla smaragdina, and their repelling of pollinators. Ecological Research, 19, 669–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D., & Kay, A. (2002). Do extrafloral nectaries distract ants from visiting flowers? An experimental test of an overlooked hypothesis. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, T. C. (2008). The genus Macaranga: A prodroms. Kew: Kew Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmer, P. G., Nuttman, C. V., Raine, N. E., Stone, G. N., Pattrick, J. G., Henson, K., et al. (2009). Floral volatiles controlling ant behaviour. Functional Ecology, 23, 888–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmer, P. G., & Stone, G. N. (1997). How aggressive ant-guards assist seed-set in Acacia flowers. Nature, 388, 165–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamasaki, E., Inui, Y., & Sakai, S. (2014). Production of food bodies on the reproductive organs of myrmecophytic Macaranga species (Euphorbiaceae): effects on interactions with herbivores and pollinators. Plant Species Biology, 29, 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank H. A. B. Yusop (Forest Department of Sarawak), L. Chong (Sarawak Forestry Corporation), T. Nakashizuka, and T. Itioka for research permission (Permit No. NCCD.907.4.4(Jld.8)-24). We also thank H. Kojima for weevil identification, T. Suzuki and J. Takabayashi for advice on chemical analyses, and D. Hembry for English-language editing. This study was financially supported by the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (Project D-04), Grants-in-Aid Nos. 21570028 and 23770022 from Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology to S.S. and Y.I., respectively, and a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 24-1464 to E.Y.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eri Yamasaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 646 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamasaki, E., Inui, Y. & Sakai, S. Ant-Repelling Pollinators of the Myrmecophytic Macaranga winkleri (Euphorbiaceae). Evol Biol 43, 407–413 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-015-9365-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-015-9365-0

Keywords

Navigation