Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution pattern and conservation of threatened medicinal and aromatic plants of Central Himalaya, India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was conducted to examine the distribution pattern of four rhizomatous medicinal and aromatic plant species (MAPs) viz., Angelica glauca, Pleurospermum angelicoides, Rheum emodi and Arnebia benthamii in different forest stands in Central Himalaya. Results show that A. glauca and P. angelicoides had a higher (50%) frequency at Chipkoan, Garpak and Phagati forest, R. emodi had a higher (60%) frequency at Rishikund, Suki and Himtoli, and A. benthamii had a higher (70%) frequency at Suki and Khambdhar The densities of A. glauca (0.6 plants·m−2) and P. angelicoides (0.5 plants·m−2) were higher at Chipkoan and Garpak sites than at other micro-sites, while densities of R. emodi (0.8 plants·m−2) and A. benthamii (1.0 plants·m−2) were higher at Suki and Khambdhar sites. A. glauca had highest total basal covers (TBC) (1.2 cm2·m−2) at Chipkoan, P. angelicoides had highest TBC (0.92 cm2·m−2) at Lati kharak site, A. benthamii had the highest TBC (6.48 cm2·m−2) at Khambdhar, and R. emodi had highest TBC (4.53 cm2·m−2) at Rishikund. For the four studied species, A. glauca showed a contagious distribution, P. angelicoides and R. emodi showed the random and A. benthamii showed the regular type of distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bisht NS, Kusumlata. 1993. Niche width and dominance diversity relations of woody species in a moist temperate of Garhwal Himalaya. Journal of Hill Research, 6: 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongers F, Poorter L, Van Rompaey RSAR, Parren MPE. 1999. Distribution of twelve moist forest canopy tree species in Liberia and Cote d’Ivoire: response curves to a climatic gradient. Journal of Vegetation Science, 10: 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J. 1932. Plant Sociology: The study of plant communities. (Transl. G.D. Fuller & H.C. Conard). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., p. 439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis JT, Cottam G. 1956. Plant Ecology Workbook Laboratory Field Reference Manual. Minnesota: Burgess Publishing Co., p.193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis JT, McIntosh RP. 1950. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology, 31: 434–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur RD. 1999. Flora of District Garhwal, North West Himalaya (With Ethnobotanical Notes). Transmedia, Srinagar, Garhwal, Uttaranchal, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydari M, Madhavi A. 2009. Pattern of plant species diversity in related to physiographic factors in Melah Gavan protected area, Iran. Asian Journal of Biological Sciences, 2: 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajra PK. 1983. Contribution to the botany of Nanda Devi National Park, Howrah, Botanical Survey of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard P. 1912. The distribution of flora in alpine zone. New Phytosociology, 11: 37–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP. 2000. Status and conservation of rare and endangered medicinal plants in the Indian trans-Himalaya. Biological Conservation, 93: 371–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP. 2004. Pastoralism, plant conservation, and conflicts on proliferation of Himalayan Knotweed in high altitude protected areas of the Western Himalaya, India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13: 985–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP. 2005. Indigenous uses, population density and conservation of threatened medicinal plants in protected areas of the Indian Himalayas. Conservation Biology, 19: 368–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP. 2006. Problems and prospects in the conservation and development of the Himalayan medicinal plant sector. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 9:370–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP. 2010. Medicinal plants of Uttarakhand: Diversity livelihood and conservation. Delhi, India: Biotech Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw KA. 1973. Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology. London: Edward Arnold, p. 308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharkwal G, Poonam M, Rawat YS, Pangtey YS. 2005. Phytodiversity and growth form in relation to altitudinal gradients in the Central Himalayan (Kumaun) region of India. Current Science, 89: 873–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharkwal G, Rawat YS, Pangtey YS. 2007. Distribution characteristics of the tree species in Central Himalaya, India. International Journal of Botany, 3: 226–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight DH. 1975. A phytosociological analysis of species rich tropical forest on Barro-Colorado Island: Panama. Ecological Monograph, 45: 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukshal S, Nautiyal BP, Anthwal A, Sharma A, Bhatt BP. 2009. Phytosociological investigation and life form pattern of grazing lands under Pine canopy in temperate zone, Northwest Himalaya, India. Research Journal of Botany, 4:55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar J, Ram J. 2005. Anthropogenic disturbance and plant biodiversity in forests of Uttaranchal, Central Himalaya. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14:309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH. 1965. Patterns of species diversity. Biological Review, 40: 510–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maikhuri RK, Nautiyal S, Rao KS, Chandrasekhar K, Gavali R, Saxena KG. 2000. Analysis and resolution of protected area-people conflicts in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Environmental Conservation, 27: 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra R. 1968. Ecology workbook. Calcutta: Oxford and IBH Publishing, p.244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra S, Maikhuri RK, Kala CP, Rao KS, Saxena KG. 2008. Wild leafy vegetables: A study of their subsistence dietetic support to the inhabitants of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 4: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naithani BD. 1984. Flora of Chamoli, I & II, Botanical Survey of India, Howarh.

  • Nautiyal BP, Prakash V, Chauhan RS, Harish P, Nautiyal MC. 2001. Assessment of germinability, productivity and cost benefit analysis of Picrorrhiza kurrooa cultivated at lower altitude. Current Science, 81: 579–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niggemann M, Jetzkowitz J, Brunzel S, Wichmann MC, Bialozyt R. 2009. Distribution patterns of plants explained by human movement behaviour. Ecological Modelling, 220: 1339–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP. 1971. Fundamental of Ecology. 3rd ed., WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purohit A, Maikhuri RK, Rao KS, Nautiyal S. 2001. Impact of bark removal on survival of Taxus baccata L. (Himalayan yew) in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Current Science, 81: 586–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samant SS. 1993. Diversity and status of plants in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, In; Scientific and ecological expedition on Nanda Devi. Reports, Corps of Engineers (Army), New Delhi, India, pp. 45–53.

  • Saxena AK, Singh JS. 1980. Analysis of forest grazing lands vegetation in parts of Kumaun Himalaya. Indian Journal of Range Management, 1: 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1963. The Mathematical theory of communication. Champaign, IL, USA: University of Illinois Press, p.367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh JS, Singh SP. 1992. Forest of Himalaya: Structure, Functioning and Impact of Man. Nainital, India: Gyanodaya Prakashan,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh JS, Yadav PS. 1974. Seasonal variation in composition, plant biomass and net primary productivity of tropical grasslands at Kurukshetra, India. Ecological Monograph, 44: 351–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL. 1980. Ecology and Field Biology. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, p. 835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL. 1990. Student resource manual to accompany ecology and field biology. Fourth edition, New York: Harper and Row Publisher, p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song B, Chen J, Desanker PV, Reed DD, Bradshaw GA, Franklin DF. 1997. Modelling canopy structure and heterogeneity across scales: from crown to canopy. Forest Ecology and Management, 96: 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. S. Kandari.

Additional information

Foundation project: This work was supported by financial assistantships from NATP-PB, NBPGR, Pusa Campus New Delhi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kandari, L.S., Rao, K.S., Maikhuri, R.K. et al. Distribution pattern and conservation of threatened medicinal and aromatic plants of Central Himalaya, India. Journal of Forestry Research 22, 403–408 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-011-0110-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-011-0110-y

Keywords

Navigation