Skip to main content
Log in

A Strong Remedy to a Weak Ethical Defence of Homeopathy

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, I indicate and illustrate several flaws in a recent “ethical defence” of homeopathy. It transpires that the authors’ arguments have several features in common with homeopathic remedies, including strong claims, a lack of logic or evidence, and no actual effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Shaw.

Additional information

This is a commentary in response to the article “A Gentle Ethical Defence of Homeopathy” by Levy, Gadd, Kerridge, and Komesaroff (2015). The original article, published in the Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12(2): 203–209, can be located at DOI 10.1007/s11673-014-9563-y.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaw, D. A Strong Remedy to a Weak Ethical Defence of Homeopathy. Bioethical Inquiry 12, 549–553 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-015-9674-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-015-9674-0

Keywords

Navigation