Abstract
Nanotechnologies are expected to have a substantial impact on our lives in the future. However, the nanotechnology field is characterised by many uncertainties and debates surrounding the characterisation of technologies, the nature of the applications, the potential benefits and the likely risks. Given the rapid development of nanotechnologies, it is timely to consider what, if any, novel ethical challenges are posed by developments and how best to address these given the attendant uncertainties. The three articles which comprise this symposium consider the philosophical, regulatory and risk perception and communication questions that arise from this arena.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ebbeson, M. 2008. The role of the humanities and social sciences in nanotechnology research and development. NanoEthics 2: 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11569-008-0033-z.
Evans, J. 2002. Playing God?: Human genetic engineering and the rationalization of public bioethical debate. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Gavelin, K., R. Wilson, and R. Doubleday. 2007. Democratic technologies?: The final report of the nanotechnology engagement group. London: Involve.
Goldenberg, L. 2006. Nanotechnologies and society in Canada. In Nanotechnology: Risk, ethics and law, ed. G. Hunt, and M. Mehta. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Market Attitude Research Services. 2008. Australian community attitudes held about nanotechnology - trends 2005 to 2008. Canberra: DIISR.
Petersen, A., and A. Anderson. 2007. A question of balance or blind faith?: Scientists’ and science policymakers’ representations of the benefits and risks of nanotechnologies. NanoEthics 1: 243–256. doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0021-8.
Pidgeon, N., B.H. Harthorn, K. Bryan, and T. Rogers-Hayden. (2008). Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United states and United Kingdom, Nature Nanotechnology. Published Online, 7(December).
Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering. 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London: Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering.
Wilsdon, J., and R. Willis. 2004. See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London: Demos.
Woodrow Wilson Project on Emerging Nanotechnology. 2008. A nanotechnology consumer product inventory. Washington DC, Woodrow Wilson (available at: http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/) Accessed 10 January 2009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petersen, A. Introduction: The Ethical Challenges of Nanotechnologies. Bioethical Inquiry 6, 9–12 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-009-9137-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-009-9137-6