Skip to main content
Log in

Failure Analysis: Sulfide Stress Corrosion Cracking and Hydrogen-Induced Cracking of A216-WCC Wellhead Flow Control Valve Body

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wellhead flow control valve bodies which are the focal point of this failure case study were installed in some of the upstream facilities of Khangiran’s sour gas wells. These valve bodies have been operating satisfactorily for 3 years in wet H2S environment before some pits and cracks were detected in all of them during the periodical technical inspections. One failed valve body was investigated by chemical and microstructural analytical techniques to find out the failure cause and provide preventive measures. The valve body alloy was A216-WCC cast carbon steel. During investigation many cracks were observed on the inner surface of the valve body grown from the surface pits. The results indicate that flow control valve body failed due to combination of hydrogen-induced corrosion cracking and sulfide stress corrosion cracking. According to HIC and SSC laboratory tests and also with regard to cost of engineering materials, it was evident that the best alternative for the valve body alloy is A217-WC9 cast Cr–Mo steel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.A. Carneiro, R.C. Ratnapuli, The influence of chemical composition and microstructure of API linepipe steels on hydrogen induced cracking and sulfide stress corrosion cracking. Mater. Sci. Eng. A357, 104–110 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Tang, Y. Shao, The effect of H2S concentration on the corrosion behavior of carbon steel at 90 °C. Corros. Sci. 52, 2050–2058 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Forder, M. Thew, D. Harrison, A numerical investigation of solid particle erosion experienced within oilfield control valves. Wear 216, 184–193 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R.S. Tresseder, in Stress Corrosion Cracking and Hydrogen Embrittlement of Iron Base Alloys, ed. by R.W. Staehle (NACE, Houston, TX, 1977), p. 147

  5. K. Ume et al., Initiation and propagation morphology of sulfide stress corrosion cracking at welds on linepipe steels. Corrosion (1985) [paper 240, March 25–29, Boston, MA]

  6. E. Ramirez, J.G. Gonzalez, Effect of microstructure on the sulfide stress cracking susceptibility of a high strength pipeline steel. Corros. Sci. 50, 3534–4354 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. W.K. Kim, H.G. Jung, Relationship between hydrogen-induced cracking and type I sulfide stress cracking of high-strength linepipe steel. Scripta Mater. 62, 195–198 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Domizzi, G. Anteri, Influence of sulphur content and inclusion distribution on the hydrogen induced blister cracking in pressure vessel and pipeline steels. Corros. Sci. 43, 325–339 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T.Y. Jin, Z.Y. Liu, Y.F. Cheng, Effect of non-metallic inclusions on hydrogen-induced cracking of API5L X100 steel. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35, 8014–8021 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G.T. Park, S.U. Koh, Effect of microstructure on the hydrogen trapping efficiency and hydrogen induced cracking of linepipe steel. Corros. Sci. 50, 1865–1871 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. NACE Standard MR175, Materials for use in H2S Containing Environments in Oil and Gas Production. (NACE, Houston, TX, 2001)

  12. W.K. Kim, B.Y. Yang, Effect of environmental and metallurgical factors on hydrogen induced cracking of HSLA steels. Corros. Sci. 50, 3336–3342 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Al-Mansour, A.M. Al-Fantazi, Sulfide stress cracking resistance of API–X100 high strength low alloy steel. Mater. Des. 30, 4088–4094 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Zhao, Y. Shan, Investigation on the H2S-resistant behaviors of acicular ferrite and ultrafine ferrite. Mater. Lett. 57, 141–145 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Huang, J. Lee, Effect of H2S on the electrochemical behavior of steel weld in acidic chloride solutions. Mater. Chem. Phys. 58, 177–181 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Huang, W. Tsai, Cracking characteristics of A516 steel weldment in H2S containing environments. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 188, 219–227 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank East Oil and Gas Production Company (EOGPC), the Research Council of Sharif University of Technology, and Razi Metallurgical Lab for supporting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. R. Ziaei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ziaei, S.M.R., Kokabi, A.H. & Mostowfi, J. Failure Analysis: Sulfide Stress Corrosion Cracking and Hydrogen-Induced Cracking of A216-WCC Wellhead Flow Control Valve Body. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 14, 376–383 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9810-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9810-x

Keywords

Navigation