Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of limit strains in superplastic materials

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple model has been developed to study the effects of static and dynamic grain growth and strain rate on the ductility of superplastic materials. One-half of a tensile specimen was modeled numerically using a power-law creep constitutive equation, with either a constant strain rate or constant extension rate. Static grain growth was shown to reduce material ductility at all rates of growth, except when the imposed strain rate was very low. Dynamic grain growth was shown to enhance ductility at lower growth rates and for intermediate imposed strain rates, while decreasing ductility at higher growth rates. Comparison of simulated and experimental results reveals the relationship between strain and grain size, thus justifying the treatment of dynamic grain growth as a function of accumulated strain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T.G. Langdon: Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 689–701.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.F. Ashby and R.A. Verrall: Acta Metall., 1973, vol. 21, pp. 149–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J.R. Springarn and W.D. Nix: Acta Metall., 1978, vol. 26, pp. 1389–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C.H. Hamilton: Metall. Trans. A, 1989, vol. 20A, pp. 2783–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Weertman: Trans. TMS-AIME, 1963, vol. 227, p. 1475.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.K. Ghosh and C.H. Hamilton: Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 773–43.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.H. Wagoner and J.-L. Chenot: Fundamentals of Metal Forming, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1996, pp. 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Takayama, N. Furushiro, T. Tozawa, and H. Kato: Mater. Sci. Forum, 1994, vols. 170–172, pp. 561–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Rai and N.J. Grant: Metall. Trans. A, 1975, vol. 6A, pp. 385–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. O.N. Senkov and M.M. Myshlyaev: Acta Metall., 1986, vol. 34, pp. 97–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J.D. Verhoven: Fundamentals of Physical Metallurgy, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1975, p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D.S. Wilkinson and C.H. Cáceres: J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1984, vol. 3, pp. 395–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D.R. Lesuer, C.K. Syn, K.L. Cadwell, and C.S. Preuss: in Advances in Superplasticity and Superplastic Forming, N. Chandra, H. Garmestani, and R.E. Goforth, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1993, pp. 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.K. Rabinovich and V.G. Trifonov: Acta Mater., 1996, vol. 44 (5), pp. 2073–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. G.S. Daehn: Stanford University, Stanford, CA, unpublished research, 1988.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miles, M.P., Daehn, G.S. & Wagoner, R.H. Prediction of limit strains in superplastic materials. Metall Mater Trans A 34, 2559–2564 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-003-0015-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-003-0015-2

Keywords

Navigation