Skip to main content
Log in

Bone mineral density screening and its accordance with Canadian clinical practice guidelines from 2000–2013: an unchanging landscape in Saskatchewan, Canada

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

We examined the clinical characteristics of patients who underwent initial dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing at a primary care facility from 2000 to 2013, and whether these factors changed over time in accordance with Canadian clinical practice guidelines. The burden of osteoporosis remains high and largely unchanged and clinical practice guidelines are not being followed, overall.

Purpose

This study examined the clinical risk factors, therapeutic health behaviors, and bone mineral density (BMD) status of patients who underwent initial DXA testing at a primary care facility in Saskatchewan, Canada, and whether these factors changed over time from 2000 to 2013 in accordance with Canadian clinical practice guidelines.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional medical chart audit of 800 patients 50 years of age and older who underwent their first DXA test to assess BMD status. Data was extracted from 2000 to 2013 and further stratified into four periods (2000–2001, 2002–2006, 2007–2009, and 2010–2013; n = 200 each period) based on the years when practice guidelines were implemented. Extracted data included BMD outcomes, clinical risk factor indicators for DXA testing, and recommendations for therapeutic health behaviors outlined in the clinical practice guidelines.

Results

There were no differences in BMD status across the four time stratas (p = 0.430). Overall, most clinical risk factors had little change over time. The number of males screened significantly increased over time (p < 0.05), and osteoporosis drug therapy use decreased from 2000–2001 to 2010–2013 (p < 0.001). Increasing age, body mass <60 kg, and history of adult fracture were significant independent predictors of osteoporosis diagnosis.

Conclusions

The burden of osteoporosis remains high and largely unchanged in Saskatchewan, Canada. These results serve to inform strategies to enhance health-care provider awareness and compliance with practice guidelines, as well as improve screening rates and patient health behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osteoporosis Canada (2014) Osteoporosis and you. http://www.osteoporosis.ca/osteoporosis-and-you/ Accessed 12 Nov 2014

  2. Tarride JE, Hopkins RB, Leslie WD, Morin S, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A et al (2012) The burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canada. Osteoporos Int 23:2591–2600. doi:10.1007/s00198-012-1931-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Brennan RM, Wactawski-Wende J, Crespo CJ, Dmochowski J (2004) Factors associated with treatment initiation after osteoporosis screening. Am J Epidemiol 160:475–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McLeod KM, McCann SE, Horvath PJ, Wactawski-Wende J (2007) Predictors of change in calcium intake in postmenopausal women after osteoporosis screening. J Nutr 137:1968–1973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G, Gao Y, Sawka AM, Goltzman D, Tenenhouse A, Pickard L, Olszynski WP, Davison KS, Kaiser S, Josse RG, Krieger N, Hanley DA, Prior JC, Brown JP, Anastassiades T, Adachi JD (2008) The osteoporosis care gap in men with fragility fractures: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 19:581–587. doi:10.1007/s00198-007-0483-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown JP, Josse RG (2002) 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167(10):S1–S34

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, Hanley DA, Hodsman A, Jamal SA, Kaiser SM, Kvern B, Siminoski K, Leslie WD (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ 182(17):1864–1873

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown JP, Fortier M, Frame H, Lalonde A, Papaioannou A, Senikas V, Yuen CK, Osteoporosis Guidelines Committee (2006) Canadian Consensus Conference on osteoporosis, 2006 update. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 28(2 Suppl 1):S95–S112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Cranney A, Zytaruk N, Adachi JD (2006) Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35:293–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leslie WD, LaBine L, Klassen P, Dreilich D, Caetano PA (2012) Closing the gap in postfracture care at the population level: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 184(3):290–296. doi:10.1503/cmaj.111158

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Metge CG, Leslie WD, Manness L-J, Yogendran M, Yuen CK, Kvern B (2008) Postfracture care for older women: gaps between optimal care and actual care. Can Fam Physician 54:1270–1276

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng N, Green ME (2008) Osteoporosis screening for men. Can Fam Physician 54:1140–1141

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Poliquin S, Joseph L, Gray-Donald K (2009) Calcium and vitamin D intakes in an adult Canadian population. Can J Diet Pract Res 70:21–27. doi:10.3148/70.1.2009.21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vatanparast H, Dolega-Cieszkowski JH, Whiting S (2009) Many adult Canadians are not meeting current calcium recommendations from food and supplement intake. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 34:191–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiwa F, Foley JM, Theriault D, Siminoski K, Morin S, Kapoor R et al (2008) Breaking barriers not bones: 2008 National Report Card on Osteoporosis Care. Osteoporosis Canada, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  16. Statistics Canada. Annual demographic estimates: Canada, provinces, and territories, 2012, Cat. No. 91-215-X

  17. Berger C, Langsetmo L, Joseph L, Hanley D, Davison K, Josse R et al (2008) Change in bone mineral density as a function of age in women and men and association with the use of antiresorptive agents. CMAJ 178:1660–1668

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Cranney A, Jamal SA, Tsang JF, Josse RG, Leslie WD (2007) Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women. CMAJ 177(6):575–580

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hawker G, Mendel A, Lam MA et al (2012) A clinical decision rule to enhance targeted bone mineral density testing in healthy mid-life women. Osteoporos Int 23:1931–1938. doi:10.1007/s00198-011-1862-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. North American Menopause Society (2010) Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: 2010 position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 17:25–54. doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e3181c617e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang HX, Majumdar SR, Dick DA et al (2005) Development and initial validation of a risk score for predicting in-hospital and 1-year mortality in patients with hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20(3):494–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Leslie WD, Lix LM, Langsetmo L, Berger C, Goltzman D, Hanley DA, Adachi JD, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA (2011) Construction of a FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment. Osteoporos Int 22(3):817–827. doi:10.1007/s00198-010-1464-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jha S, Wang Z, Laucis N, Bhattacharyya T (2015) Trends in media reports, oral bisphosphonate prescriptions and hip fractures 1996–2012: an ecological analysis. J Bone Miner Res. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2565

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Osteoporosis Canada (2014) Make the first break the last with Fracture Liaison Services. http://www.osteoporosis.ca/fracture-liaison-service/ Accessed 12 Nov 2014

  26. Jaglal SB, Donescu OS, Bansod V, Laprade J, Thorpe K, Hawker G, Majumdar SR, Meadows L, Cadarette SM, Papaioannou A, Kloseck M, Beaton D, Bogoch E, Zwarenstein M (2012) Impact of a centralized osteoporosis coordinator on post-fracture osteoporosis management: a cluster randomized trial. Osteoporos Int 23(1):87–95. doi:10.1007/s00198-011-1726-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

There are no acknowledgements.

Financial disclosure

The authors have no financial disclosures.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine M. McLeod.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McLeod, K.M., Johnson, S., Charturvedi, R. et al. Bone mineral density screening and its accordance with Canadian clinical practice guidelines from 2000–2013: an unchanging landscape in Saskatchewan, Canada. Arch Osteoporos 10, 20 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-015-0227-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-015-0227-2

Keywords

Navigation