Skip to main content
Log in

La protesi di spalla negli esiti traumatici

Shoulder arthroplasty in fracture sequelae

  • Aggiornamenti
  • Published:
LO SCALPELLO-OTODI Educational

Abstract

The treatment of fracture sequelae of proximal humerus is still a challenge. Shoulder arthroplasty improves pain and Range Of Motion (ROM) but the results are inferior to the outcomes currently obtained in primary osteoarthritis or acute trauma. Anatomical and reverse total shoulder prosthesis are becoming increasingly popular because of better results than hemiarthroplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliografia

  1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37:691–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burton DJC, Watters AT (2006) Management of proximal humeral fractures. Curr Orthop 20(3):222–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cicak N, Klobucar H, Medancic N (2015) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in acute fractures provides better results than in revision procedures for fracture sequelae. Int Orthop 39(2):343–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobson JA, Duquin TR, Sanchez-Sotelo J et al. (2014) Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humerus malunions. J. Shoulder Elb Surg 23(8):1232–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mansat P, Bonnevialle N (2015) Treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus: anatomical vs reverse shoulder prosthesis. Int Orthop 39(2):349–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Acevedo DC, Vanbeek C, Lazarus MD et al. (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: update on indications, technique, and results. J. Shoulder Elb Surg 23(2):279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rüedi TP, Murphy WM (2001) AO principles of fracture management. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duparc F (2013) Malunion of the proximal humerus. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(Suppl:1):S1–S11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rockwood CA, Matsen FA (2009) The shoulder, 4th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mata-Fink A, Meinke M, Jones C et al. (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older adults: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22(12):1737–1748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boileau P, Trojani C, Walch G et al. (2001) Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of the sequelae of fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg 10:299–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moineau G, McClelland WB Jr, Trojani C et al. (2012) Prognostic factors and limitations of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of posttraumatic cephalic collapse or necrosis (type-1 proximal humeral fracture sequelae). J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(23):2186–2194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boileau P, Neyton L (2008) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fracture sequelae. Constrained or nonconstrained prosthesis? In: Boileau P, Walch G, Molé D et al. (eds) Shoulder Concepts 2008. Proximal humeral fractures and fracture sequelae. Sauramps Médical, Montpellier, pp 265–269

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kiliç M, Berth A, Blatter G et al. (2010) Anatomic and reverse shoulder prostheses in fracture sequelae of the humeral head. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44(6):417–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Willis M, Min W, Brooks JP et al. (2012) Proximal humeral malunion treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(4):507–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alentorn-Geli E, Guirro P, Santana F, Torrens C (2014) Treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus: comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(11):1545–1550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martinez AA, Bejarano C, Carbonel I et al. (2012) The treatment of proximal humerus nonunions in older patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Injury 43:S3–S6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Martinez AA, Calvo A, Bejarano C et al. (2012) The use of the Lima reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus. J Orthop Sci 17:141–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zafra M, Uceda P, Flores M, Carpintero P (2014) Reverse total shoulder replacement for nonunion of a fracture of the proximal humerus. Bone Jt J 96:1239–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wall B, Nové-Josserand L, O’Connor DP et al. (2007) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:1476–1485

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wellmann M, Struck M, Pastor MF et al. (2013) Short and mid-term results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty according to the preoperative etiology. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:463–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fevang BT, Lygre SH, Bertelsen G et al. (2013) Pain and function in eight hundred and fifty nine patients comparing hemiprostheses, resurfacing prostheses, reversed total and conventional total prostheses. Int Orthop 37:59–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fevang BT, Nystad TW, Skredderstuen A et al. (2015) Improved survival for anatomic total shoulder prostheses. Acta Orthop 86(1):63–70

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Duquin TR, Jacobson JA, Sanchez-Sotelo J et al. (2012) Unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral nonunions. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(17):1610–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Raiss P, Edwards TB, da Silva MR et al. (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of nonunions of the surgical neck of the proximal part of the humerus (type-3 fracture sequelae). J Bone Jt Surg Am 96(24):2070–2076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Greiner S, Uschok S, Herrmann S et al. (2014) The metaphyseal bone defect predicts outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture sequelae. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:755–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Randelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflitto di interesse

Gli autori Pietro Randelli, Chiara Fossati, Paolo Capitani, Filippo Randelli e Paolo Cabitza dichiarano di non avere alcun conflitto di interesse.

Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici

Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti inclusi nello studio.

Human and animal rights

L’articolo non contiene alcuno studio eseguito su esseri umani e su animali da parte degli autori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Randelli, P., Fossati, C., Capitani, P. et al. La protesi di spalla negli esiti traumatici. LO SCALPELLO 29, 171–175 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-015-0134-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-015-0134-8

Navigation