Skip to main content
Log in

Blade Lean and Tip Leakage Flows in Highly Loaded Compressor Cascades

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blade lean has been intensively utilized in axial compressors. In this study, three families of highly loaded compressor cascades featuring different aspect ratios (AR) with different levels of blade lean were designed and simulated with and without tip clearance. The influences of blade lean on corner separation and tip leakage flow (TLF) were investigated. Results show that blade lean can exert spanwise pressure gradient confined to the fore part, spanwise mass flow rate re-distribution exhibiting differently at fore and rear part of blade, and stage reaction variations. AR has a significant influence on blade lean. With the increase of AR, corner separation grows significantly and requires a higher lean level to be controlled. TLF eliminates corner separation of linear cascades but also increases the loss of leaned cascades; blade lean introduces 22% higher tip leakage mass flow, but exhibits 43% (blade M) and 38% (blade E) lower tip leakage loss. The flow mechanism can be mainly accounted by the reduction of bulk flow velocity, tip leakage velocity and the velocity difference near leading edge (LE). High AR cascade induces re-distribution of TLF along blade chord and reduces leakage loss compared with low AR counterpart.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AR:

aspect ratio

C:

chord

C P :

static pressure coefficient=\((P-P_1)/\frac{1}{2}(P_1^*-P_1)\)

D :

diffusion factor=\(1-\frac{V_2}{V_1}+\frac{\Delta{V}_y}{2V_1\tau}\)

E :

extra

i :

incidence angle/(°)

L:

linear

LE:

leading edge

m :

mass flow rate/kg·s−1

M:

moderate

Ma :

Mach number

P :

static pressure/Pa

P*:

stagnation pressure/Pa

PS:

pressure surface

Re :

Reynolds number (chord based)

SS:

suction surface

ΔS :

entropy generation/J·mol−1·K−1

TE:

trailing edge

T*:

stagnation temperature/K

TC:

tip clearance

TLF:

tip leakage flow

TLV:

tip leakage vortex

V :

Velocity/m·s−1

x :

spanwise coordinate

y :

pitchwise coordinate

z :

axial coordinate

α :

intersection angle between bulk flow and injected flow/(°)

β :

flow angle/(°)

β k :

blade geometric angle/(°)

γ :

stagger angle/(°)

λ :

blade leaned angle/(°)

μ :

dynamic viscosity/Pa·s

ρ :

density/kg·m−3

τ :

solidity

ω :

loss coefficient=\((P_1^*-P^*)/\frac{1}{2}(P_1^*-P_1)\)

1:

cascade inlet

2:

cascade outlet (0.4 axial chord downstream the cascade)

c:

injected flow

m:

bulk flow

t:

tip clearance

References

  1. Deich M.E., Gubalev A.B., Filippov G.A., Wang Z.Q., A new method of profiling the guide vane cascade of stage with small ratios diameter to length. Teplienergetika, 1962, 8(8): 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Z.Q., Lai S.K., Xu W.Y., Aerodynamic calculation of turbine stator cascades with curvilinear leaned blades and some experimental results. Proceedings of Symposium of 5th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, Bangalore, India, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Denton J.D., Xu L., The exploitation of three-dimensional flow in turbomachinery design. Proceedings of IMechE, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1999, 213(2): 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Houmouziadis J., Hubner N., 3-D design of turbine airfoils. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, ASME Paper 85-GT-188, Houston, Texas, March 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosic B., Xu L.P., Blade lean and shroud leakage flows in low aspect ratio turbines. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2012, 134(3): 031003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Walker P.J., Blade lean in axial turbines: model turbine measurements and simulation by novel numerical methods. PhD Thesis, Cambridge University, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grant J., Borthwick D., Fully three dimensional inviscid flow calculations for the final stage of a large low pressure steam turbine. IMechE Paper C281/87, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kan X.X., Wang S.T., Yang L., Zhong J.J., Vortex dynamic mechanism of curved blade affecting flow loss in compressor cascade during corner stall process. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 85: 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Y.W., Yan H., Liu Y.J., et al., Numerical study of corner separation in a linear compressor cascade using various turbulence models. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2016, 29(3): 639–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu H.W., Yang Y., Guo S., et al., Control of corner separation via dimpled surface for a highly loaded compressor cascade under different inlet Mach number. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 85: 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang Y.M., Liu Y.W., Lu L.P., et al., Passive separation control with blade-end slots in a highly loaded compressor cascade. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(1): 85–97.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meng Q.H., Du X., Chen S.W., et al., Numerical study of dual sweeping jet actuators for corner separation control in compressor cascade. Journal of Thermal Science, 2021, 30: 201–209.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Breugelmans F.A.E., Influence of incidence angle on the secondary flow in compressor cascade with different dihedral distribution. Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, Beijing, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shang Erbing, Wang Z.Q., Su J.X., The experimental investigation on the compressor cascade with leaned and curved blade. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, ASME Paper 93-GT-050, Cincinnati, Ohio, May 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bogod A.B., Direct and inverted calculation of 2D axisymmetric and 3D flows in axial compressor blade rows. Revue Francaise de Mecanique, 1992, 4: 351–359.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer A., Riess W., Seume J.R., Performance of strongly bowed stators in a four-stage high-speed compressor. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2004, 126(3): 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cao Z.Y., Liu B., Zhang T., et al., Influence of coupled boundary layer suction and bowed blade on flow field and performance of a diffusion cascade. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 30(1): 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor J.V., Miller R.J., Competing three-dimensional mechanisms in compressor flows. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2016, 139(2): 021009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhong J.J., Han S.B., Lu H.W., et al., Effect of tip geometry and tip clearance on aerodynamic. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26(3): 583–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Duan Y.H., Wu W.H., Zhang P.H., et al., Performance improvement of optimization solutions by POD-based data mining. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(4): 826–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vo H.D., Tan C.S., Greitze E.M., Criteria for spike initiated rotating stall. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2008, 130(1): 011023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Beselt Ch., Eck M., Peitsch D., Three-dimensional flow field in highly loaded compressor cascade. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2014, 136(10): 101007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu X.J., Liu B.J., Jiang H.K., Characteristics of the tip leakage vortex in a low-speed axial compressor. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45(4): 870–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brandstetter C., Jungst M., Schiffer H.P., Measurements of radial vortices, spill forward and vortex breakdown in a transonic compressor. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2018, 140(6): 061004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cui W.W., Xiang X.R., Zhao Q.J., et al., The effect of sweep on flow fields of a highly loaded transonic rotor. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 58: 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wunderwald D., Fottner L., Experimental investigation of boundary layer transition and turbulence structures on a highly loaded compressor cascade. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, ASME Paper 95-GT-129, Houston, Texas, June 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Meyer R., Bechert D.W., Hage W., Secondary flow control on compressor blades to improve the performance of axial turbomachines. Proceedings of 5th European Conference on Turbomachinery-Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, Prague, March 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lei V.M., Spakovszky Z.S., Greitzer E.M., A criterion for axial compressor hub-corner stall. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2008, 130(3): 031006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Denton J.D., Loss mechanisms in turbomachines. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1993, 115(4): 621–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51806174), the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (No. 2019-JQ137), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. G2018KY0303), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51790512).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyuan Cao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, Z., Song, C., Zhang, X. et al. Blade Lean and Tip Leakage Flows in Highly Loaded Compressor Cascades. J. Therm. Sci. 30, 1388–1405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-021-1486-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-021-1486-4

Keywords

Navigation