Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainability assessment and ranking of run of the river (RoR) hydropower projects using analytical hierarchy process (AHP): A study from Western Himalayan region of India

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present scenario, tapping the unutilised hydropower potential is one of the highest priorities in developing countries of the world. Special emphasis is being imparted to run of the river (RoR) mode of power generation. However, the governments are now facing the dilemma whether to promote small hydropower projects (SHPs) or encourage large hydropower projects (LHPs). RoR large hydropower projects result into large scale cutting of mountains for constructing tunnels and access roads, generation of huge quantity of muck and large scale impact on flora and fauna due to diversion of rivers/streams. On the other hand, though SHPs are claimed to be greener and more sustainable by a section of researchers and energy planners but, they will be required to be set up in large number to generate equivalent amount of electricity. The aim of this study is to rank the most sustainable installed capacity range of RoR hydropower projects. To achieve this aim, the study proposes the use of quite popular multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method of Operation Research named Analytical Hierarchy Process. A case study has been presented from Himachal Pradesh, a hydro rich state located in the western Himalayan region. As per sustainability assessment carried out in this study, hydropower projects in the capacity range 1 to 5 MW have been ranked to be the most sustainable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi SA, Abbasi N (2000) The likely adverse environmental impacts of renewable energy sources. Applied Energy 65: 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2011) Small hydro and the environmental implications of its extensive utilization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15: 2134–2143. DOI: 10.1016/ j.rser.2010.11.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afgan NH, Carvalho MG, Hovanov NV (2000) Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators. Energy Policy 28: 603–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras H, Erdoğmuş S, Koç E (2004) Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Renewable Energy 29: 1383–1392. DOI: 10.1016/ j.renene.2003.12.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakis R, Demirbas A (2004) Sustainable development of small hydropower plants. Energy Sources 26 (12): 1105–1118. DOI: 10.1080/00908310390265932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakken TH, Aase AG, Hagen D, et al. (2014) Demonstrating a new framework for the comparison of environmental impacts from small-and large-scale hydropower and wind power projects. Journal of Environmental Management 140: 93–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakken TH, Sundt H, Ruud A, Harby A (2012) Development of small versus large hydropower in Norway–comparison of environmental impacts. Energy Procedia 20: 185–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck MW, Claassen AH, Hundt PJ (2012) Environmental and livelihood impacts of dams: common lessons across development gradients that challenge sustainability. International Journal of River Basin Management 10 (1): 73–92. DOI: 10.1080/15715124.2012.656133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bódis K, Monforti F, Szabó S (2014) Could Europe have more mini hydro sites? A suitability analysis based on continentally harmonized geographical and hydrological data. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 37: 794–808. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton J, Hubacek K (2007) Is small beautiful? A multicriteria assessment of small-scale energy technology applications in local government. Energy Policy 35 (12): 6402–6412. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEA (Central Electricity Authority), Ministry of Power (MoP), Govt. of India, (2015) Status of hydro electric potential development (in terms of installed capacity–above 25 MW), as on 31.01.2015. Available online at: http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/hydro/he_potentialstatus_region.pdf (Accessed on 22 March 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan K, Daim T, Anderson T (2010) Exploring the impact of technology development and adoption for sustainable hydroelectric power and storage technologies in the Pacific Northwest United States. Energy 35: 4771–4779. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diduck AP, Pratap D, Sinclair AJ, Deanea S (2013) Perceptions of impacts, public participation, and learning in the planning, assessment and mitigation of two hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand, India. Land Use Policy 33: 170–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DoEHP (Directorate of Energy, Himachal Pradesh) (2015) Status of hydro potential in Himachal Pradesh. Available online at: http://admis.hp.nic.in/doe/DOEAuth/welcome.aspx (Accessed on 4 April 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • DoEHP (Directorate of Energy, Himachal Pradesh) (2015a) List of projects with details. Available online at: http://admis.hp.nic.in/doe/DOEAuth/welcome.aspx (Accessed on 2 April 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • DOEST (Department of Environment, Science and Technology), Govt. of Himachal Pradesh, India (2013) Environment Master Plan of Himachal Pradesh. Executive summary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombi M, Kuti I, Balogh P (2014) Sustainability assessment of renewable power and heat generation technologies. Energy Policy 67: 264–271. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta S, Ramanathan AL, Linda A (2012) Glacier fluctuation using satellite data in Beas Basin, 1972-2006, Himachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Earth System Science 121 (5): 1105–1112. DOI: 10.1007/s12040-012-0219-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egre D, Milewski JC (2002) The diversity of hydropower projects. Energy Policy 30: 1225–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erees, S, Kuruoglu E, Morai N (2013) An application of Analytical Hierarchy Process for simulation software selection in education area. Frontiers in Science 3 (2): 66–70. DOI: 10.5923/j.fs.20130302.03

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlewein A (2013) Disappearing rivers — the limits of environmental assessment for hydropower in India. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 43: 135–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans A, Strezov V, Evans TJ (2009) Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13: 1082–1088. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodland R (1994) Environmental sustainability and the power sector. Impact Assessment 12 (4): 409–470. DOI: 10.1080/07349165.1994.9725877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himurja (Himachal Pradesh Energy Development Agency) (2014) List of projects allotted (526 Projects up to 5.00 MW capacity being developed under private sector participation). Available online at: http://himurja.nic.in/mousigned.html (Accessed on 2 May 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang IB, Keisler J, Linkov I (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Science of the Total Environment 409: 3578–3594. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (International Energy Agency) Technical Report (May 2000). Survey of the environmental and social impacts and the effectiveness of mitigation measure in hydropower development, vol. 1. IEA ETSAP (International Energy Agency; Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme) Technology Brief E12 -May 2010.

  • IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2014) Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol, London, UK. Available online at: http://www.hydrosustainability.org/ (Accessed on 24 March 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • IR (N (International River Network and 12 other organisations) (2003) Twelve reasons to exclude large hydro from renewables initiatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaunda CS, Kimambo CZ, Nielsen TK (2012) Hydropower in the context of sustainable energy supply: a review of technologies and challenges. International Scholarly Research Network (ISRN) Renewable Energy, vol. 2012, Article ID730631: 1–15. DOI: 10.5402/2012/730631

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaygusuz K (2002) Sustainable development of hydroelectric power. Energy Sources 24 (9): 803–815. DOI: 10.1080/00908310290086725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaygusuz K (2009) The role of hydropower for sustainable energy development. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 4 (4): 365–376. DOI: 10.1080/15567240701756889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibler KM, Tullos DT (2013) Cumulative biophysical impact of small and large hydropower development in Nu River, China. Water Resources Research 49: 3104–3118. DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimpt JE, Rivero C, Puranen H, Koch F (2002) Recommendations for sustainable hydroelectric development. Energy Policy 30: 1305–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosnik L (2008) The potential of water power in the fight against global warming in the US. Energy Policy 36: 3262–3265. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Schei T, Ahenkorah A, et al. (2011) Hydropower. In IPCC Special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation [Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, et al. (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law KMY (2010) Factors affecting sustainability development: high-tech manufacturing firms in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review 15 (4): 619–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • MakeItRational AHP software (2014) Available online at: http://makeitrational.com/analytic-hierarchy-process/ahpsoftware (Accessed 4 May 2015)

  • Maxim A (2014) Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis. Science of the Total Environment 472: 282–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MNRE (Ministry of New and Renewable Energy), Government of India (2015a) Hydro Power Project Classification. Available online at: http://www.mnre.gov.in/schemes/grid-connected/small-hydro/ (Accessed on 29 March 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • MNRE (Ministry of New and Renewable Energy), Govt. of India (2015) Physical progress (achievements). Available online at: http://mnre.gov.in/mission-and-vision-2/achievements/ (Accessed on 28 February 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forests), GoI (Government of India) (2006) Environment Impact Assessment Notification.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morimoto R (2013) Incorporating socio-environmental considerations into project assessment models using multicriteria analysis: A case study of Sri Lankan hydropower projects. Energy Policy 59: 643–653. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nautiyal H, Singal SK, Varun SK, Sharma A (2011) Small hydropower for sustainable energy development in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15: 2021–2027. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCDMA (National Clean Development Authority) of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF), GoI (Government of India) (2014) Approved projects. Available online at: http://cdmindia.gov.in/ (Accessed 2 May 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Onat N, Bayar H (2010) The sustainability indicators of power production systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14: 3108–3115. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multicriteria decision making to sustainable energy planning_a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 8: 365–381. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premalatha M, Abbasi T, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2014) A critical view on the eco-friendliness of small and large hydroelectric installations. Science of the Total Environment 481:638–643. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purohit P (2008) Small hydro power projects under clean development mechanism in India: a preliminary assessment. Energy Policy 36: 2000–2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R, Ganesh LS (1995) Energy resource allocation incorporating qualitative and quantitative criteria: an integrated model using Goal Programming and AHP. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 29 (3): 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana N, Sati SP, Sundriyal YP (2007) Socio-economic and environmental implications of the hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand Himalaya, India. Journal of Mountain Science 4 (4): 344–353. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-007-0344-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy VR, Uitto JI, Frans DR, Matin N (2006) Achieving global environmental benefits through local development of clean energy? The case of small hilly hydel in India. Energy Policy 34:4069–4080. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rio PD, Burguillo M (2008) Assessing the impact of renewable energy deployment on local sustainability: towards a theoretical framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12: 1325–1344. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso M, Bottero M, Pomarico S, et al. (2014) Integrating multicriteria evaluation and stakeholders analysis for assessing hydropower projects. Energy Policy 67: 870–881. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15:57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 1st ed. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences 1 (1): 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar AU, Karagioz S (1995) Sustainable development of hydroelectric power. Energy 20 (10): 977–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scannapieco D, Naddeo V, Belgiorno V (2014) Sustainable power plants: A support tool for the analysis of alternatives. Land Use Policy 36: 478–484. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma HK, Rana PK (2014) Assessing the impact of hydroelectric project construction on the rivers of district Chamba of Himachal Pradesh in the Northwest Himalaya, India. International Research Journal of Social Sciences 3 (2): 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Kuniyal JC (2013) Ambient air quality and health status during construction of hydropower projects in the hilly region of Kullu valley, Himachal Pradesh. Transactions 35 (1): 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Kuniyal JC, Sharma JC (2007) Assessment of manmade and natural hazards in the surroundings of hydropower projects under construction in the Beas Valley of Northwestern Himalaya. Journal of Mountain Science 4 (3): 221–236. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-007-0221-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool BK, Dhakal S, Gippner O, Bambawale MJ (2011) Halting hydro: A review of the socio-technical barriers to hydroelectric power plants in Nepal. Energy 36: 3468–3476. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spänhoff B (2014) Current status and future prospects of hydropower in Saxony (Germany) compared to trends in Germany, the European Union and the World. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30: 518–525. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling EV (2012) Hydropower in Brazil: Overview of positive and negative environmental aspects. Energy Procedia 18: 110–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supriyasilp T, Pongput K, Boonyasirikul T (2009) Hydropower development priority using MCDM method. Energy Policy 37: 1866–1875. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taele BM, Mokhutsoane L, Hapazari I (2012) An overview of small hydropower development in Lesotho: Challenges and prospects. Renewable Energy 44: 448–452. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou E, Mann SH (1995) Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for decision making in engineering applications: Some challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice 2 (1): 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya OS, Kumar S (2006) Analytic Hierarchy Process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research 169: 1–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varun, Bhat IK, Prakash R (2008) Life cycle analysis of run-of river small hydro power plants in India. The Open Renewable Energy Journal 1: 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera I, Langlois L (2007) Energy indicators for sustainable development. Energy 32: 875–882. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vucijak B, Kupusovic T, Midzic-Kurtagic S, Ceric A (2013) Applicability of multicriteria decision aid to sustainable hydropower. Applied Energy 101: 261–267. DOI: 10.1016/ j.apenergy.2012.05.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF, Zhao JH (2009) Review on multicriteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decisionmaking. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13: 2263–2278. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • www.inflation.eu (2014) Yearwise average inflation in India (as per Consumer Price Index). Available online at: www.inflation.eu/inflation-rates/india/historicinflation/ cpi-inflatio-india.aspx (Accessed on 10 December 2014)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Energy and Environmental Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, 177005, Himachal Pradesh, India

    Deepak Kumar & Surjit Singh Katoch

Authors
  1. Deepak Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Surjit Singh Katoch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepak Kumar.

Additional information

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8862-9193

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5342-0178

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, D., Katoch, S.S. Sustainability assessment and ranking of run of the river (RoR) hydropower projects using analytical hierarchy process (AHP): A study from Western Himalayan region of India. J. Mt. Sci. 12, 1315–1333 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3156-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3156-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation