Skip to main content
Log in

FLO-2D simulation of mudflow caused by large landslide due to extremely heavy rainfall in southeastern Taiwan during Typhoon Morakot

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Daniau Village in Daniau Creek Watershed, Taitung County, Taiwan, sustained damages from landslides and mudflows during Typhoon Morakot in 2009. The purpose of this study is to adopt the FLO-2D numerical model recognized by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to simulate the mudflow, and the Daniau Village was used as a case study, along with rainfall and digital terrain data for this simulation. On the basis of sediment yields, the residual sediment volume in the landslide area was determined to be 33,276 m3 by comparison of digital elevation models (DEMs) and by using the universal soil loss equation (USLE). In addition, this study performed a hydrological frequency analysis of rainfall to estimate the flow discharge as conditions of the simulation. Results of disaster surveys were collected to compare with outputs of the numerical model. Results of the simulation conducted with FLO-2D indicated that if the countermeasure was not destroyed, the drainage work would function without overflow. This study aimed to review the effectiveness of countermeasure on the basis of simulation results obtained by using the model to provide references for future disaster prevention and resident evacuation plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleotti P, Polloni G (2003) Two-dimensional model of the 1998 Sarno debris flows (Italy): preliminary results. In: Rickenmann D, Chen CL (Eds.), Third International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment. Davos, Switzerland. pp. 553–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armento MC, Genevois R, Tecca PR (2008) Comparison of numerical models of two debris flows in the Cortina d’Ampezzo area, Dolomites, Italy. Landslides 5(1): 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedient PB, Huber WC (2002) Hydrology and Floodplain Analysis. Prentice Hall Publishing, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SC, Chen LK (2002) The Planning and Enforcement of Evacuation and Shelter System for Debris Flow Disaster. In: Chen SC (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Debris-Flow Disaster Mitigation Strategy, Chinese Taipei. pp. 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SC, Huang BT (2010) Non-structural mitigation programs for sediment-related disasters after the Chichi Earthquake in Taiwan. Journal of Mountain Science 7(3): 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SC, Wu CY, Huang BT (2010) The efficiency of a risk reduction program for debris-flow disasters — a case study of the Songhe community in Taiwan. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 10(7): 1591–1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT (1988) Applied Hydrology. McGraw Hill Publishing, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG, Story M (1986) Accuracy assessment: a user’s perspective. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 55(9): 1303–1309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coroza O, Evans D, Bishop I (1997) Enhancing runoff modeling with GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning 38: 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croke BFW, Islam A, Ghosh J, et al. (2011) Evaluation of approaches for estimation of rainfall and the unit hydrograph. Hydrology Research 42(5): 372–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia R, López JL, Noya M, et al. (2003) Hazard mapping for debris flow events in the alluvial fans of northern Venezuela. In: Rickenmann, D. and Chen, C.L. (eds.), Third International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment. Davos, Switzerland, pp. 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubl J, Steinwendtner H (2001) Two-dimensional simulation of two viscous debris flows in Austria. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Part C-Solar-Terrestial and Planetary Science 26(9): 639–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imran J, Parker G, Locat J, et al. (2001) 1D numerical model of muddy subaqueous and subaerial debris flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering-ASCE 127(11): 959–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang CL, Shimizu Y (2007) Numerical analysis of braided rivers and alluvial fan deltas. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 1(1): 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin M, Fread DL (1999) 1D modeling of mud/debris unsteady flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering-ASCE 125(8): 827–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laigle D, Coussot P (1997) Numerical modeling of mudflows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering-ASCE 123(7): 617–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CC, Lin A, Tsai YJ (2010) A Study of the Sediment Problem Caused by Typhoon Morakot — Taking the Watershed of Tsengwen Reservoir as an Example. Journal of the Taiwan Disaster Prevention Society 2(1): 51–58. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien JS (2006) FLO-2D User’S Manual. Version 2006.01, FLO-2D Software, Inc., Nutrioso.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien JS, Julien PY, Fullerton WT (1993) Two-dimensional water flood and mudflow simulation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering-ASCE 119(2): 244–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor M, Quecedo M, Gonzalez E, et al. (2004) Simple approximation to bottom friction for Bingham fluid depth integrated models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering-ASCE 130(2): 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Wang HY, Tsai CT (2010) Copula-based depthduration-frequency analysis of typhoons in Taiwan. Hydrology Research 41(5): 414–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosio R, Crosta GB, Frattini P (2007) Field observations, rheological testing and numerical modelling of a debris-flow event. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32(2): 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz A, Huggel C (2008) Debris flows in the Swiss National Park: the influence of different flow models and varying DEM grid size on modeling results. Landslides 5(3): 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SWCB (2008) Integrated Watershed Investigation and Planning Manual. Report of Soil and Water Conservation Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Chinese Taipei. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • SWCB (2011) Slopeland Conservation Investigation and Planning of Daniau Coastal Watershed. Report of Soil and Water Conservation Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Chinese Taipei. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyos G, Dorta DO, Oppenheimer C, et al. (2007) GIS-assisted modelling for debris flow hazard assessment based on the events of May 1998 in the area of Sarno, Southern Italy: Part I. Maximum run-out. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32(10): 1491–1502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vemu S, Pinnamaneni UB (2011) Estimation of spatial patterns of soil erosion using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Indravati catchment. Natural Hazards 59(3): 1299–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanielista MP (1990) Hydrology and Water Quantity Control. John Willey & Sons Publishing, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Agriculture Handbook 537.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRA (2009) Hydrological Analysis Report of Typhoon Morakot. Presentation Document of Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Chinese Taipei. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Szu-Hsien Peng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, SH., Lu, SC. FLO-2D simulation of mudflow caused by large landslide due to extremely heavy rainfall in southeastern Taiwan during Typhoon Morakot. J. Mt. Sci. 10, 207–218 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2510-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2510-2

Keywords

Navigation