Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Role of perception in determining adaptive capacity: communities adapting to environmental change

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 14 February 2017

Abstract

In this study, we investigate perception of likely environmental change as a factor of community adaptive capacity. A comparison of perceived change with science-based assessment of change is proposed to better understand community risk assessment and decision-making. Based on this analysis, we identify shared attitudes and perceptions of change that can be used to develop communication about environmental change in a manner that is appropriate within the context of the community. A community-level survey was conducted to sample differences in individual perception of likely environmental change as well as attitudes regarding climate change and natural resource management among residents of Alaska’s Kenai Peninsula. We compare perceptions of likely environmental change to science-based assessments of change using a conceptual framework that recognizes socio-cognitive processes associated with decision-making. We evaluate the relationship of those perceptions to attitudes using quantitative methods. A binary logistic model is used to investigate the predictive relationship between perception and attitudes regarding climate change and natural resource management. A cultural consensus model is then used to determine areas of shared community perception of change and attitudes. Results of this analysis suggest that despite diverse individual perceptions of environmental change, shared community perceptions and attitudes can be identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. Comptes Rendus Geosci 337:399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Brooks N, Bentham G, Agnew M, Eriksen S (2004) New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change

  • Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim. Change 93:335–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof K, Maibach EW, Fitzgerald D, Cedeno AY, Neuman A (2013) Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Glob Environ Change 23:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alessa L (Na’ia), Kliskey A (Anaru), Williams P, Barton M (2008) Perception of change in freshwater in remote resource-dependent Arctic communities. Glob Environ Change 18:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauret S, Stuefer S (2013) Kenai Peninsula precipitation and air temperature trend analysis. In 19th International northern research basins symposium and workhop, (Southeast Alaska), pp 35–44

  • Berg EE, Anderson RS (2006) Fire history of white and Lutz spruce forests on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, over the last two millennia as determined from soil charcoal. For Ecol Manag 227:275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg EE, Hillman KM, Dial R, DeRuwe A (2009) Recent woody invation of wetlands on the Kenai Peninsula Lowlands, south-central Alaska: a major regime shift after 18,000 years of wet Spahgnum-sedge peat recruitment. Can J For Res 39:2033–2046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard HR (2011). Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches (Rowman Altamira)

  • Borgatti SP, Halgin DS (1997) Consensus analysis. Companion Cogn Anthropol 171–190

  • Burton I, Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E, Malone EL, Huq S (2005) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies, and measures. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton S, Devine-Wright P, Stern PC, Whitmarsh L, Carrico A, Steg L, Swim J, Bonnes M (2015) Psychological research and global climate change. Nat Clim Change 5:640–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL (2011) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb D, Butcher J, Srinivasan R (2015) Projected hydrologic changes under mid-21st century climatic conditions in a sub-arctic watershed. Water Resour Manag 29:1467–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dial RJ, Berg EE, Timm K, McMahon A, Geck J (2007) Changes in the alpine forest-tundra ecotone commensurate with recent warming in southcentral Alaska: evidence from orthophotos and field plots. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 2005–2012:112

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle NL (2011) Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Glob Environ Change 21:647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnis J, Sarkar A, Stoddart MCJ (2015) Bridging science and community knowledge? The complicating role of natural variability in perceptions of climate change. Glob Environ Change 32:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grothmann T, Grecksch K, Winges M, Siebenhüner B (2013) Assessing institutional capacities to adapt to climate change: integrating psychological dimensions in the adaptive capacity wheel. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:3369–3384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson J, van der Linden S, Chabay I (2012) The role of knowledge, learning and mental models in public perception of climate change related risks. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 322–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe PD, Leiserowitz A (2013) Who remembers a hot summer or a cold winter? The asymmetric effect of beliefs about global warming on perceptions of local climate conditions in the US. Glob Environ Change 23:1488–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. R Inst Int Aff 85:1261–1262

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones L (2011) Towards a holistic conceptualisation of adaptive capacity at the local level: insights from the local adaptive capacity framework (LAC) Overseas Development Institute (ODI). http://www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/7177.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2013

  • Jones L, Ludi E, Levine S (2010) Towards a characterisation of adaptive capacity: a framework for analysing adaptive capacity at a local level (Overseas Development Institute)

  • Kahan DM (2012) Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: an experimental study. Judgm Decis Mak 8:407–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan DM (2015) Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Polit Psychol 36:1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Change 2:732–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein E, Berg EE, Dial R (2005) Wetland drying and succession across the Kenai Peninsula lowlands, south-central Alaska. Can J For Res 35:1931–1941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol Bull 108:480–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TM, Markowitz EM, Howe PD, Ko C-Y, Leiserowitz AA (2015) Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nat Clim Change 5:1014–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman N, Trope Y, McCrea SM, Sherman SJ (2007) The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. J Exp Soc Psychol 43:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood M, Raymond CM, Oczkowski E, Morrison M (2015) Measuring the dimensions of adaptive capacity: a psychometric approach. Ecol Soc 20(1):37. doi:10.5751/ES-07203-200137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JA, Clark JS, Bigelow NH, Edwards ME, Finney BP (2003) Geographic and temporal variations in fire history in boreal ecosystems of Alaska. J Geophys Res 108(D1):FFR 8-1–FFR 8-17. doi:10.1029/2001JD000332

  • Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A (2009) Global warming’s six Americas 2009: an audience segmentation analysis (Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale project on climate change communication)

  • Marx SM, Weber EU, Orlove BS, Leiserowitz A, Krantz DH, Roncoli C, Phillips J (2007) Communication and mental processes: experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Glob Environ Change 17:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauger, S. (2013). Stream temperature monitoring network for cook inlet salmon streams, 2008–2012 (Cook Inletkeeper)

  • Meze-Hausken E (2004) Contrasting climate variability and meteorological drought with perceived drought and climate change in northern Ethiopia. Clim Res 27:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimura N, Pulwarty R, Duc DM, Elshinnawy I, Redsteer MH, Huang HQ, Nkem JN, Sanchez Rodriguez RA (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group ii to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 869-898

  • Myers TA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Akerlof K, Leiserowitz AA (2013) The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat Clim Change 3:343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation Bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2:175–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie D, Mitchell R, Mutrie N, Petticrew M, Platt S (2008) Perceived characteristics of the environment associated with active travel: development and testing of a new scale. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5:32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce W, Brown B, Nerlich B, Koteyko N (2015) Communicating climate change: conduits, content, and consensus: communicating climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 6:613–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romney AK, Weller SC, Batchelder WH (1986) Culture as consensus: a theory of culture and informant accuracy. Am Anthropol 88:313–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24:311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Pilifosova O (2003) Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. Sustain Dev 8:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S (2007) IPCC:the physical science basis: contribution of working group I (Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge University Press)

  • Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2012) The psychological distance of climate change: psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32:957–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford JM, Wendler G, Curtis J (2000) Temperature and precipitation of Alaska: 50 year trend analysis. Theor Appl Climatol 67:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber EU (2006) Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: why global warming does not scare us (yet). Clim Change 77:103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein ND (1980) Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J Pers Soc Psychol 39:806–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller SC (2007) Cultural consensus theory: applications and frequently asked questions. Field Methods 19:339–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiest SL, Raymond L, Clawson RA (2015) Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Glob Environ Change 31:187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willette M, Shields P (2015) 2016 upper cook inlet sockeye salmon forecast. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries. News Release. p 4

  • Wolken JM, Hollingsworth TN, Rupp TS, Chapin FS, Trainor SF, Barrett TM, Sullivan PF, McGuire AD, Euskirchen ES, Hennon PE et al (2011) Evidence and implications of recent and projected climate change in Alaska’s forest ecosystems. Ecosphere 2, art124

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Alaska Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (Alaska EPSCoR) NSF award #OIA-1208927 and the State of Alaska. Data from the Kenai General Population Survey: Your Values and Experiences on the Kenai were provided by Drs. Sarah Wandersee and Chad Farrell. We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Barbara Adams for her review and comments on this manuscript as well as those provided by three anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Alaska Center for Conservation Science, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA

    Jess Grunblatt

  2. College of Art and Architecture, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive MS 2481, Moscow, ID, 83844-2481, USA

    Lilian Alessa

Authors
  1. Jess Grunblatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lilian Alessa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jess Grunblatt.

Additional information

Handled by Osamu Saito, United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS), Japan.

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0425-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grunblatt, J., Alessa, L. Role of perception in determining adaptive capacity: communities adapting to environmental change. Sustain Sci 12, 3–13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0394-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0394-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation