Factors Affecting Influential Discussions Among Physicians: A Social Network Analysis of a Primary Care Practice
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Physicians often rely on colleagues for new information and advice about the care of their patients.
Evaluate the network of influential discussions among primary care physicians in a hospital-based academic practice.
Survey of physicians about influential discussions with their colleagues regarding women’s health issues. We used social network analysis to describe the network of discussions and examined factors predictive of a physician’s location in the network.
All 38 primary care physicians in a hospital-based academic practice.
Location of physician within the influential discussion network and relationship with other physicians in the network.
Of 33 responding physicians (response rate = 87%), the 5 reporting expertise in women’s health were more likely than others to be cited as sources of influential information (odds ratio [OR] 6.81, 95% Bayesian confidence interval [CI] 2.25–23.81). Physicians caring for more women were also more often cited (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.05 for a 1 percentage-point increase in the proportion of women patients). Influential discussions were more frequent among physicians practicing in the same clinic within the practice than among those in different clinics (OR 5.03, 95% CI 3.10–8.33) and with physicians having more weekly clinical sessions (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.54 for each additional session).
In the primary care practice studied, physicians obtained information from colleagues with greater expertise and experience as well as colleagues who were accessible based on location and schedule. It may be possible to organize practices to promote more rapid dissemination of high-quality evidence-based medicine.
- Haug, JD (1997) Physicians’ preferences for information sources: a meta-analytic study. Bull Med Libr Assoc 85: pp. 223-232
- Bates, DW, Gawande, AA (2003) Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med 348: pp. 2526-2534 CrossRef
- Cullen, R (1997) The medical specialist: information gateway or gatekeeper for the family practitioner. Bull Med Libr Assoc 85: pp. 348-355
- Weinberg, AD, Ullian, L, Richards, WD, Cooper, P (1981) Informal advice- and information-seeking between physicians. J Med Educ 56: pp. 174-180
- Keating, NL, Zaslavsky, AM, Ayanian, JZ (1998) Physicians’ experiences and beliefs regarding informal consultation. JAMA 280: pp. 900-904 CrossRef
- Kuo, D, Gifford, DR, Stein, MD (1998) Curbside consultation practices and attitudes among primary care physicians and medical subspecialists. JAMA 280: pp. 905-909 CrossRef
- Gabbay, J, May, A (2004) Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ 329: pp. 1013 CrossRef
- Covell, DG, Uman, GC, Manning, PR (1985) Information needs in office practice: are they being met?. Ann Intern Med 103: pp. 596-599
- Gruppen, LD, Wolf, FM, Voorhees, C, Stross, JK (1987) Information-seeking strategies and differences among primary care physicians. Mobius 7: pp. 18-26
- Williamson, JW, German, PS, Weiss, R, Skinner, EA, Bowes, F (1989) Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. Ann Intern Med 110: pp. 151-160
- Coleman JS, Katz E, Menzel H. Medical Innovation. A Diffusion Study. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc; 1966.
- Lomas, J, Enkin, M, Anderson, GM, Hannah, WJ, Vayda, E, Singer, J (1991) Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section. JAMA 265: pp. 2202-2207 CrossRef
- Soumerai, SB, McLaughlin, TJ, Gurwitz, JH (1998) Effect of local medical opinion leaders on quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 279: pp. 1358-1363 CrossRef
- Gifford, DR, Holloway, RG, Frankel, MR (1999) Improving adherence to dementia guidelines through education and opinion leaders. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 131: pp. 237-246
- Keating, NL, Zaslavsky, AM, Ayanian, JZ (2000) Physicians’ reports of focused expertise in clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 15: pp. 417-420 CrossRef
- Borgatti SP. ed. NetDraw: Graph Visualization Software. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies; 2002.
- Duijn, M, Snijders, TAB, Zijlstra, B (2004) P2: a random effects model with covariates for directed graphs. Statistica Neerlandica 58: pp. 234-254 CrossRef
- Lazega, E, Duijn, M (1997) Position in formal structure, personal characteristics, and choices of advisors in a law firm: a logistic regression model for dyadic network data. Soc Netw 19: pp. 375-397 CrossRef
- Lurie, N, Slater, J, McGovern, P, Ekstrum, J, Quam, L, Margolis, K (1993) Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter?. N Engl J Med 329: pp. 478-482 CrossRef
- Henderson, JT, Weisman, CS (2001) Physician gender effects on preventive screening and counseling: an analysis of male and female patients’ health care experiences. Med Care 39: pp. 1281-1292 CrossRef
- Gruppen, LD (1990) Physician information seeking: improving relevance through research. Bull Med Libr Assoc 78: pp. 165-172
- Factors Affecting Influential Discussions Among Physicians: A Social Network Analysis of a Primary Care Practice
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 22, Issue 6 , pp 794-798
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- consultation and referral
- primary care
- physician behavior
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, 02115, Massachusetts, USA
- 2. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- 3. Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- 4. Department of Sociology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA