Date: 18 Nov 2008
Laparoscopic Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis: A Comparative Observational Study on Long-term Functional Results
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Long-term results after laparoscopic ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) have not been thoroughly evaluated. Our study prospectively compares short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open IPAA.
Between October 2002 and November 2007, 73 laparoscopic and 106 open IPAA patients were enrolled. Patient- and disease-specific characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes were prospectively collected.
There were no differences in demographics, treatment, indication, duration of surgery, and diversion between groups. Laparoscopic patients had faster return of flatus (p = 0.008), faster assumption of a liquid diet (p < 0.001), and less blood loss (p = 0.026). While complications were similar, the incidence of incisional hernias was lower in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.011). Mean follow-up was 24.8 months. Average number of bowel movements was 6.8 ± 2.8/day for laparoscopy and 6.3 ± 1.7 for open (p = 0.058). Overall, 68.4% of patients were fully continent at 1 year, up to 83.7% long term without differences between groups. Other indicators of defecatory function and quality of life remain similar overtime.
Laparoscopic IPAA confers excellent functional results. Most patients are fully continent and have an average of six bowel movements/day. When present, minor incontinence improves over time. Laparoscopy mirrors the results of open IPAA and is a valuable alternative to open surgery.
This study was funded in part by the University of Chicago Cancer Research Foundation (UCCRF) Auxiliary Board Research Support Grant (A.F.).
Presented at the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Tripartite Meeting. Boston. June 9, 2008.
Michelassi F, Lee J, Rubin M, et al. Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study. Ann Surg 2003;238(3):433–441, discussion 42–45.PubMed
Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, van Duijvendijk P, Gouma DJ. Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44(12):1800–1807. doi:10.1007/BF02234458.PubMedCrossRef
Michelassi F, Block GE. A simplified technique for ileal J-pouch construction. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;176(3):290–294.PubMed
Hurst RD, Molinari M, Chung TP, Rubin M, Michelassi F. Prospective study of the incidence, timing and treatment of pouchitis in 104 consecutive patients after restorative proctocolectomy. Arch Surg 1996;131(5):497–500.PubMed
Akman PC. A study of five hundred incisional hernias. J Int Coll Surg 1962;37:125–142.PubMed
- Laparoscopic Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis: A Comparative Observational Study on Long-term Functional Results
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume 13, Issue 3 , pp 526-532
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Ulcerative colitis
- Laparoscopic surgery
- Quality of life
- Surgical outcomes
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Surgery, MC 5095, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
- 2. Department of Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 E. 68th St., New York, NY, 10021, USA