Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the potential of virtual non-contrast CT (VNCT) from dual-energy CT to replace true nonenhanced CT (TNCT) for the detection of enlarged cervical lymph nodes.
Materials and methods
Thirty-nine patients with 94 histopathologically proven cervical lymph nodes were imaged with the dual-energy CT technique. VNCT images from the arterial [VNCT-A] and venous phases [VNCT-V] were obtained with the liver VNC application. The mean CT number and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were compared. Image quality was evaluated with a score scale of 1–5. Effective dose (ED) was calculated and compared.
Results
Mean CT numbers of cervical lymph nodes were higher on VNCT than on TNCT (P = 0.034). There was no difference in the SNR among three sets of non-enhanced CT images, but the CNR of VNCT images was higher than that of TNCT images (P < 0.001). Image quality of VNCT from two phases was comparable to that of TNCT (P = 0.070). There was no difference in image quality of three sets of non-enhanced CT images (P > 0.05). ED from dual-phase dual-energy CT was lower than that from tri-phase CT scans (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
VNCT images from dual-energy CT of the neck had diagnostic image quality; they have the potential to replace TNCT, thus reducing the radiation dose.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kao J, Lavaf A, Teng MS, Huang D, Genden EM. Adjuvant radiotherapy and survival for patients with node-positive head and neck cancer: an analysis by primary site and nodal stage. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:362–70.
Mack MG, Rieger J, Baghi M, Bisdas S, Vog TJ. Cervical lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66:493–500.
Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Hermans R. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in neck lymph adenopathy. Cancer Imaging. 2008;8:173–80.
Vogl TJ, Schulz B, Bauer RW, Stöver T, Sader R, Tawfik AM. Dual-energy CT applications in head and neck imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:S34–9.
Lu GM, Zhao Y, Zhang LJ, Schoepf UJ. Dual-energy CT of the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:S40–53.
Heye T, Nelson RC, Ho LM, Marin D, Boll DT. Dual-energy CT applications in the abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:S64–70.
Zhang LJ, Peng J, Wu SY, et al. Liver virtual non-enhanced CT with dual-source, dual-energy CT: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2257–64.
Mangold S, Thomas C, Fenchel M, et al. Virtual nonenhanced dual-energy CT urography with tin-filter technology: determinants of detection of urinary calculi in the renal collecting system. Radiology. 2012;264:119–25.
Takahashi N, Vrtiska TJ, Kawashima A, et al. Detectability of urinary stones on virtual nonenhanced images generated at pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT. Radiology. 2010;256:184–90.
Tawfik AM, Kerl JM, Razek AA, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of dual-energy CT of the head and neck compared with a standard 120-kVp acquisition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:1994–9.
Tawfik AM, Kerl JM, Bauer RW, et al. Dual-energy CT of head and neck cancer: average weighting of low- and high-voltage acquisitions to improve lesion delineation and image quality-initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:306–11.
Behrendt FF, Schmidt B, Plumhans C, et al. Image fusion in dual energy computed tomography: effect on contrast enhancement, signal-to-noise ratio and image quality in computed tomography angiography. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:1–6.
McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin N Am. 2009;47:27–40.
Chu AJ, Lee JM, Lee YJ, Moon SK, Han JK, Choi BI. Dual-source, dual-energy multidetector CT for the evaluation of pancreatic tumours. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e891–8.
Sun H, Xue HD, Wang YN, et al. Dual-source dual-energy computed tomography angiography for active gastrointestinal bleeding: a preliminary study. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:139–47.
Chae EJ, Song JW, Seo JB, Krauss B, Jang YM, Song KS. Clinical utility of dual-energy CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: initial experience. Radiology. 2008;249:671–81.
Zhang LJ, Yang GF, Wu SY, Xu J, Lu GM, Schoepf UJ. Dual-energy CT imaging of thoracic malignancies. Cancer Imaging. 2013;13:81–91.
Kaufmann S, Sauter A, Spira D, et al. Tin-filter enhanced dual-energy-CT: image quality and accuracy of CT numbers in virtual noncontrast imaging. Acad Radiol. 2013;20:596–603.
Sahni VA, Shinagare AB, Silverman SG. Virtual unenhanced CT images acquired from dual-energy CT urography: accuracy of attenuation values and variation with contrast material phase. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:264–71.
De Cecco CN, Darnell A, Macías N, et al. Virtual unenhanced images of the abdomen with second-generation dual-source dual-energy computed tomography: image quality and liver lesion detection. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:1–9.
Barrett T, Bowden DJ, Shaida N, et al. Virtual unenhanced second generation dual-source CT of the liver: is it time to discard the conventional unenhanced phase? Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:1438–45.
Toepker M, Moritz T, Krauss B, et al. Virtual non-contrast in second-generation, dual-energy computed tomography: reliability of attenuation values. Eur J Radiol. 2012;8:e398–405.
Shaida N, Bowden DJ, Barrett T, et al. Acceptability of virtual unenhanced CT of the aorta as a replacement for the conventional unenhanced phase. Clin Radiol. 2012;67:461–7.
Graser A, Johnson TR, Hecht EM, et al. Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images? Radiology. 2009;252:433–40.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Y., Jia, X., Deng, Y. et al. Can virtual non-enhanced CT be used to replace true non-enhanced CT for the detection of palpable cervical lymph nodes? A preliminary study. Jpn J Radiol 32, 324–330 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-014-0308-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-014-0308-y