Skip to main content
Log in

Comparisons of bone mass measurements on various skeletal sites including quantitative ultrasonography of the calcaneus for assessing age-related losses, their correlations, and diagnostic agreement using the Japanese and WHO criteria for osteoporosis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Radiation Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare age-related bone losses and correlations among several bone mass measurements and to evaluate diagnostic agreement among them using the Japanese and WHO criteria for osteoporosis.

Materials and methods

A total of 846 women (mean ± SD: age 54 ± 9 years) were evaluated. Bone mineral densities of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and calcaneus were measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry and distal radius by peripheral computed tomography. Quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) parameters of the calcaneus were also measured. The age-related bone losses after 50 years of age and correlations among bone mass results were evaluated using linear regression analysis. Diagnostic agreement was evaluated by kappa statistics.

Results

The annual losses ranged from 1.0% to 1.6%. The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.54 to 0.78. The kappa scores ranged from 0.52 to 0.30 for all subjects using the Japanese criteria and from 0.38 to 0.15 using the WHO criteria.

Conclusion

Bone mass measurements including QUS on various skeletal sites documented age-related changes similarly, and their bone masses correlated moderately. The diagnostic agreements among them were fair to poor. To screen out women with a risk of osteoporosis, it is important to choose which technique to use and which skeletal site to measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JA Kanis LJ Melton SuffixIII CC Christiansen CC Johnston N Khaltaer (1994) ArticleTitleThe diagnosis of osteoporosis J Bone Miner Res 9 1137–41 Occurrence Handle7976495 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FmslSisA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. HK Genant K Engelke T Fuerst CC Gluer S Grampp ST Harris et al. (1996) ArticleTitleNon-invasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art J Bone Miner Res 11 707–70 Occurrence Handle8725168 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28zmtl2gtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/jbmr.5650110602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. InstitutionalAuthorNameOsteoporosis Diagnostic Criteria Review Committee, Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research (1996) ArticleTitleDiagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 1996 revision Osteoporos Jpn 4 644–52

    Google Scholar 

  4. InstitutionalAuthorNameOsteoporosis Diagnostic Criteria Review Committee, Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research (2001) ArticleTitleDiagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision J Bone Miner Metab 19 331–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s007740170001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S Grampp HK Genant A Mathur P Lang M Jergas M Takada et al. (1997) ArticleTitleComparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification J Bone Miner Rees 12 697–711 Occurrence Handle10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.5.697 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ovFCgsg%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Y Lu HK Genant J Shepherd S Zhao A Mathur TP Fuerst et al. (2001) ArticleTitleClassification of osteoporosis based on bone mineral densities J Bone Miner Res 16 901–10 Occurrence Handle11341335 Occurrence Handle10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.5.901 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FgvFaksA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. ED Williams TJ Daymond (2003) ArticleTitleEvaluation of calcaneus bone densitometry against hip and spine for diagnosis of osteoporosis Br J Radiol 76 123–8 Occurrence Handle12642281 Occurrence Handle10.1259/bjr/56105358 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7islKktg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S Grampp CB Henk TP Fuerst Y Lu TR Bader F Kainberger et al. (1999) ArticleTitleDiagnostic agreement of quantitative sonography of the calcaneus with dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine and femur AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 329–33 Occurrence Handle10430129 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzlslWqug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. CR Krestan S Grampp A Resch-Holeczke CB Henk H Imhof H Resch (2001) ArticleTitleDiagnostic disagreement of imaging quantitative sonography of the calcaneus with dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine and femur AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 213–6 Occurrence Handle11418431 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzlslemuw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. FM Lomoschitz S Grampp CB Henk KF Linnau CR Kresta H Resch et al. (2003) ArticleTitleComparison of imaging-guided and non-imaging-guided quantitative sonography of the calcaneus with dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine and femur AJR Am J Roentgenol 180 1111–6 Occurrence Handle12646464 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7jtF2itw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. K Kim SuffixII IK Han H Kim NH Cho (2001) ArticleTitleHow reliable is the ultrasound densitometer for community screening to diagnose osteoporosis in spine, femur, and forearm? J Clin Densitom 4 159–65 Occurrence Handle11486785 Occurrence Handle10.1385/JCD:4:2:159 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvktVOhtA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. FE Alenfeld K Engelke D Schmidt M Brezger E Diessel D Felsenberg (2002) ArticleTitleDiagnostic agreement of two calcaneal ultrasound devices: the Sahara bone sonometer and the Achilles+ Br J Radiol 75 895–902 Occurrence Handle12466255 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jgsVOqsg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D Hans AM Schott MC Chapuy M Benamar PD Kotzki C Cormier et al. (1996) ArticleTitleUltrasound measurements on the os calcis in a prospective multicenter study Calcif Tissue Int 55 94–9 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00297182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K Yamazaki K Kushida A Ohmura M Sano T Inoue (1997) ArticleTitleUltrasound bone densitometry of the os calcis in Japanese women Osteoporos Int 4 220–5 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01623242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S Sakata K Kushida K Yamazaki T Inoue (1997) ArticleTitleEstablishment of diagnostic threshold for the calcaneal quantitative ultrasound from the population based data Nippon Kotsutaisya Gakkaizasshi 15 28s

    Google Scholar 

  16. I Yamamoto R Matsushita Y Yamamura T Ota Y Kigami I Yuu et al. (1996) ArticleTitleBone mineral measurement of os calcis with dual x-ray absorptiometry: determination of normal ranges in Japanese adults J Jpn Soc Bone Morphom 6 279–85

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y Hamanaka I Yamamoto M Takada R Matsushita T Ota I Yuh et al. (1999) ArticleTitleComparison of bone mineral density at various skeletal sites with quantitative ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus for assessment of vertebral fractures J Bone Miner Metab 17 195–200 Occurrence Handle10757679 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s007740050084 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3hvVKhug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. PD Miller FN Christopher LG Jankowski L Lenchik (2002) ArticleTitleWhat are the standards by which bone mass measurements at peripheral skeletal sites should be used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis? J Clin Densitom 5 s39–4 Occurrence Handle12464710 Occurrence Handle10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiko Takada.

About this article

Cite this article

Imashuku, Y., Takada, M. & Murata, K. Comparisons of bone mass measurements on various skeletal sites including quantitative ultrasonography of the calcaneus for assessing age-related losses, their correlations, and diagnostic agreement using the Japanese and WHO criteria for osteoporosis. Radiat Med 25, 148–154 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-006-0117-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-006-0117-z

Key words

Navigation