Skip to main content
Log in

Establishment of reference intervals and transfusion criterion for Sonoclot analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Sonoclot analyzer has been widely used in many countries. But the reference intervals provided by the manufacturer were derived from only 45 participants, and there was no cut-off value for transfusion for Sonoclot analysis. This study aimed to establish reference intervals and transfusion criterion for Sonoclot analysis. Volunteers were recruited from healthy Chinese adults and patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Blood samples were withdrawn from forearm vein and measured for activated clotting time (ACT), clot rate (CR), platelet function (PF), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen concentration (FIB), and platelet count (PLT). The reference intervals were determined by the nonparametric method. Cut-off values were determined by the receiver operating characteristics curve. A total of 135 healthy volunteers and 281 patients were enrolled. The 95% reference intervals were 96–195 s, 22–51 signal U/min, >1.6 for ACT, CR, PF respectively. In the 281 patients, the results of APTT, FIB, PLT, ACT, CR, and PF ranged from 20.5–300.0 s, 0.28–4.11 g/L, (19.0–387.3)×109/L, 80–514 s, 2.9–74 signal U/min, and 0.1–5.1 respectively. The cut-off values for transfusion were >208, ≤14, and ≤1.3 for ACT, CR, PF respectively. The cut-off values of Sonoclot analysis were within the manufacturer’s reference intervals, while they were outside the reference intervals established in this study. The results suggested that the manufacturer’s reference intervals were not suitable for Chinese. The reference intervals and cut-off values established in this study will be helpful to Chinese patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee B, AI-Waili N, Butler G, et al. Assessment of heparin anticoagulation by Sonoclot Analyzer in arterial reconstruction surgery. Technol Health Care, 2011,19(19):109–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schott U, Nilsson LG, Broman M, et al. Monitoring of low molecular weight heparin anticoagulation during haemodialysis with a Sonoclot Analyzer. Perfusion, 2010,25(4):191–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miyashita T, Kuro M. Evaluation of platelet function by sonoclot analysis compared with other hemostatic variables in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg, 1998,87(6):1228–1233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapin JW, Becker GL, Hulbert BJ, et al. Comparison of thromboelastograph and Sonoclot coagulation analyzer for assessing coagulation status during orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Proc, 1989,21(3):3539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bindi ML, Biancofiore GD, Consani G, et al. Blood coagulation monitoring during liver transplantation: Sonoclot analysis and laboratory tests. Minerva Anestesiol, 2001,67(5):359–369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sieders E, De Somer F, Bouchez S, et al. Haemostasis monitoring during sequential aortic valve replacement and liver transplantation. Acta Gastroenterol Belg, 2010,73(1): 65–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nuttall GA, Oliver WC, Ereth MH, et al. Coagulation tests predict bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 1997,11(7):815–823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamada T, Katori N, Tanaka KA, et al. Impact of Sonoclot hemostasis analysis after cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative hemorrhage in cardiac surgery. J Anesth, 2007,21(2):148–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sienco, Inc., Product Inserts. Available at: http://www.sienco. com/sonoclot-worldwide /product-inserts.html. Accessed March 30, 2013

  10. Padhi S, Kemmis-Betty S, Rajesh S, et al. Blood transfusion: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ, 2015,351(2):395–396

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory, Approved Guideline. Third Edition, CLSI document C28-A3. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2008

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Zhou  (周 新).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Zl., Chen, Yp., Tao, Ch. et al. Establishment of reference intervals and transfusion criterion for Sonoclot analysis. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 36, 614–617 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-016-1634-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-016-1634-3

Keywords

Navigation