Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of titanium and vanadium co-doping in LiFePO4/C using response surface methodology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Ionics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A statistically based optimization strategy is used to optimize the amount of titanium and vanadium that is co-doped in LiFePO4/C. Experimental data for fitting the response were collected using a central composite rotatable design. A second-order model that represents the discharge capacity of co-doped LiFePO4/C was expressed as a function of amount of doping titanium and vanadium. The effect of individual variables and their interactions was studied by statistical analysis of variance. The linear and quadratic effects and interactions of the amount of doping titanium and vanadium were statistically significant. Response surface plots, the spatial representations of the model, show that the discharge capacity depends more on the amount of doping vanadium than titanium. The obtained model reveals that the optimized amounts of doping titanium and vanadium are 0.03 and 0.07, respectively, which results in a theoretical discharge capacity of 144.8 mAh g−1 at 10 C. Confirmatory tests for the optimized LiV0.07Ti0.03Fe0.9PO4/C show a discharge capacity of 144.1 mAh g−1 with a capacity retention ratio of ∼100 % after 100 cycles at 10 C. The optimized LiV0.07Ti0.03PO4/C exhibits a good rate performance and cycle stability because of the enhancement of electronic conductivity and reaction reversibility through the vanadium and titanium co-doping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Padhi AK, Nanjundaswamy KS, Goodenough JB (1997) Phospho-olivines as positive-electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. J Electrochem Soc 144:1188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang Y, Huo QY, Du PP, Wang LZ, Zhang AQ, Song YH, Li GY (2012) Advances in new cathode material LiFePO4 for lithium-ion batteries. Synth Met 162:1315

  3. Yamada Y, Hosoya M, Chung SC, Kudo Y, Hinokuma K, Liu KY, Nishi Y (2003) Olivine-type cathodes: achievements and problems. J Power Sources 119–121:232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang WJ (2011) Structure and performance of LiFePO4 cathode materials: a review. J Power Sources 196:2962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yi TF, Li XY, Liu H, Shu J, Zhu YR, Zhu RS (2012) Recent developments in the doping and surface modification of LiFePO4 as cathode material for power lithium ion battery. Ionics 18:529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jugović D, Uskoković D (2009) A review of recent developments in the synthesis procedures of lithium iron phosphate powders. J Power Sources 190:538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimesso L, Förster C, Jaegermann W, Khanderi JP, Tempel H, Popp HA, Engstler J, Schneider JJ, Sarapulov A, Mikhailov D, Schmitt LA, Oswald S, Ehrenberg H (2012) Developments in nanostructured LiMPO4 (M = Fe, Co, Ni, Mn) composites based on three dimensional carbon architecture. Chem Soc Rev 41:5068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung SY, Bloking JT, Chiang YM (2002) Electronically conductive phospho-olivines as lithium storage electrodes. Nat Mater 1:123–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang D, Li H, Shi S, Huang X, Cheng L (2005) Improving the rate performance of LiFePO4 by Fe-site doping. Electrochim Acta 50:2955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wagemaker M, Ellis BL, Hecht DL, Mulder FM, Nazar LF (2008) Proof of supervalent doping in olivine LiFePO4. Chem Mater 20:6313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meethong N, Kao YH, Speakman SA, Chiang YM (2009) Aliovalent substitutions in olivine lithium iron phosphate and impact on structure and properties. Adv Funct Mater 19:1060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiang YM, Meethong N, Kao YH (2010) Reply to Comment on “Aliovalent Substitutions in Olivine Lithium Iron Phosphate and Impact on Structure and Properties”. Adv Funct Mater 20:189

  13. Hong J, Wang CS, Chen X, Upreti S, Whittingham MS (2009) Vanadium modified LiFePO4 cathode for Li-ion batteries. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 12:A33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li LJ, Li XH, Wang ZX, Guo WL, Hao Y, Zheng JC (2010) Inexpensive synthesis of metal-doped LiFePO4 from laterite lixivium and its electrochemical characterization. J Alloys Compd 497:176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang ZH, Yuan LX, Wu M, Sun D, Huang YH (2011) Effects of Na+ and Cl co-doping on electrochemical performance in LiFePO4/C. Electrochim Acta 56:8477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang ZP, Liu W, Wang Y, Zhao CS, Zhang P, Chen JT, Zhou HH, Zhang XX (2012) Synthesis and characterization of Mg and Ti Ions co-doped lithium iron phosphate and its lithium-ion batteries. Acta Phys -Chim Sin 28:2084

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ban CM, Yin WJ, Tang HW, Wei SH, Yan YF, Dillon AC (2012) A novel codoping approach for enhancing the performance of LiFePO4 cathodes. Adv Energy Mater 2:1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ding YH, Zhang P (2012) Effect of Mg and Co co-doping on electrochemical properties of LiFePO4. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 22:s153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fan CL, Zhang KH, Han SC (2013) Comprehensive methods to enhance the electrochemical performances of LiFe0.94Mg0.03Cu0.03PO4/C cathode for lithium ion batteries. Mater Res Bull 48:2497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang Y, Xu Y, Yang X (2013) Enhanced electrochemical performances of LiFePO4/C by co-doping with magnesium and fluorine. Electrochim Acta 113:156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shu H, Wang X, Wu Q, Hu B, Yang X, Wei Q, Liang Q, Bai Y, Zhou M, Wu C, Chen M, Wang A, Jiang L (2013) Improved electrochemical performance of LiFePO4/C cathode via Ni and Mn co-doping for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 237:149

  22. Yang X, Hua Z, Liang J (2015) Effects of sodium and vanadium co-doping on the structure and electrochemical performance of LiFePO4/C cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. Ceram Int 41:2863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Adweson-cook CM (2008) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 3rd edn. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. Joglekar AM, May AT (1987) Product excellence through design of experiments. Cereal Foods World 32:857

    Google Scholar 

  25. Danh LT, Mammucari R, Truong P, Foster N (2009) Response surface method applied to supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of Vetiveria zizanioides essential oil. Chem Eng J 155:617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang Q, Lau YB, Hu S, Yan W, Yang Y, Chen T (2010) Response surface methodology using Gaussian processes: towards optimizing the trans-stilbene epoxidation over Co2+–NaX catalysts. Chem Eng J 156:423

  27. Bashir MJK, Aziz HA, Yusoff MA, Adlan MN (2010) Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of ammoniac nitrogen removal from semi-aerobic landfill leachate using ion exchange resin. Desalination 254:154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang ZH, Pang QQ, Huang YH (2012) Effects of titanium incorporation on phase and electrochemical performance in LiFePO4 cathode material. Electrochim Acta 78:576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fan F, Hu J, Fu L, Zhang L (2015) Optimization of enzymolysis-ultrasonic assisted extraction of polysaccharides from Momordica charabtia by response surface methodology. Carbohydr Polym 115:701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Herle PS, Ellis B, Coombs N, Nazar LF (2004) Nano-network electronic conduction in iron and nickel olivine phosphates. Nat Mater 3:147–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tang ZY, Gao F, Xue JJ (2007) Effects of ball-milling on the preparation of LiFePO4 cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. Chin J Inorg Chem 23:1415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang L, Liang GC, Ou XQ, Zhi XK, Zhang JP, Cui JY (2009) Effect of synthesis temperature on the properties of LiFePO4/C composites prepared by carbothermal reduction. J Power Sources 189:423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Padhi AK, Nanjundaswamy KS, Masquelier C, Okada S, Goodenough JB (1997) Effect of structure on the redox Fe3+/Fe2+ in iron phosphate. J Electrochem Soc 144:1609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chiang CY, Su HC, Wu PJ, Liu HJ, Hu CW, Sharma N, Peterson VK, Hsieh HW, Lin YF, Chou WC, Lee CH, Lee JF, Shew BY (2012) Vanadium substitution of LiFePO4 cathode materials to enhance the capacity of LiFePO4‑based lithium-ion batteries. J Phys Chem C 116:24424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (21366006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan-Xuan Wen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, XY., Cui, XR., Long, YF. et al. Optimization of titanium and vanadium co-doping in LiFePO4/C using response surface methodology. Ionics 21, 2447–2455 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-015-1440-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-015-1440-0

Keywords

Navigation