Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regieren im europäischen Mehrebenensystem — Ansätze zu einer Theorie

Notes toward a theory of multi-level governing in Europe

  • Aufsätze
  • Published:
Leviathan

Abstract

The complexity of the multi-level European polity is not adequately represented by the single-level theoretical concepts of competing “intergovernmentalist” and “supranationalist” approaches. By contrast, empirical research focusing on multi-level interactions tends either to emphasize the uniqueness of its objects, or to create novel concepts — which are likely to remain contested even among Europeanists and have the effect of isolating European studies form the political science mainstream in International Relations and Comparative Politics. These difficulties are bound to continue as long as researchers keep proposing holistic concepts that claim to represent the complex reality of the European polity as a whole. It is suggested that the present competition among poorly fitting and contested generalizations could be overcome if European studies made use of a plurality of simpler and complementary concepts, each of which is meant to represent the specific characteristics of certain subsets of multi-level interactions. The paper describes four distinct modes of multi-level interaction in the European polity — “mutual adjustment”, “intergovernmental negotiations”, “joint-decision making”, and “hierarchical direction” — and discusses their characteristics by reference to the criteria of problem-solving capacity and institutional legitimacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Abromeit, Heidrun, 1998: Democracy in Europe. Legitimizing Politics in a Non-State Polity, New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Kenneth A. and Simon J. Bulmer, 1998: The Governance of the Single European Market, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, Peter and Morton S. Baratz, 1963: Decisions and Nondecisions. An Analytical Framework, in: American Political Science Review 57, S. 632–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, Alexander M., 1962: The Least Dangerous Branch. The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, Indianapolis: Bobbs Merril.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, Ann P. and Jakob C. Øhrgaard, 1999: Trapped in the Supranational-Intergovernmental Dichotomy. A Response to Stone Sweet and Sandholtz, in: Journal of European Public Policy 6, S. 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Búrca, Gráinne de and Joanne Scott (Hrsg.), 2000: Constitutional Change in the EU. From Uniformity to Flexibility?, Oxford: Hart Publishing.

  • Burley, Anne-Marie and Walter Mattli, 1993: Europe Before the Court. A Political Theory of Legal Integration, in: International Organization 47, S. 41–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Colin, 1993: Industrial Relations and European State Traditions, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A., 1961: Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A., 1967: Pluralist Democracy in the United States: Conflict and Consent, Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehejia, Vivek H. and Philipp Genschel, 1999: Tax Competition in the European Union, in: Politics and Society 27, S. 403–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, Bernhard and Jelle Visser, 2000: Trade Unions in Western Europe since 1945, London: Macmillan Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, 1984: How Flexible Is Community Law? An Unusual Approach to the Concept of “Two Speeds”, in: Michigan Law Review 82, S. 1274–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, 1998: Differentiation, Flexibility, Closer Co-Operation. The New Provisions of the Amsterdam Treaty, in: European Law Journal 4, S. 246–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichener, Volker, 1997: Effective European Problem-Solving: Lessons from the Regulation of Occupational Safety and Environmental Protection, in: Journal of European Public Policy 4, S. 591–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichener, Volker, 2000: Das Entscheidungssystem der Europäischen Union. Institutionelle Analyse und demokratietheoretische Bewertung, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgie, Robert, 1998: Democratic Accountability and Central Bank Independence. Historical and Contemporary, National and European Perspectives, in: West European Politics 21(3), S. 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, 1990: The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai, 1965: Political Unification. A Comparative Study of Leaders and Forces, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, Gerda, 1998: EU Social Policy in the 1990s. Towards a Corporatist Policy Community, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, Maurizio, Anton Hemerijck and Martin Rhodes, 2000: The Future of Social Europe. Recasting Work and Welfare in the New Economy, Oeiras: Celta Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Geoffrey, 1992: International Cooperation and Institutional Choice. The European Community’s Internal Market, in: International Organization 46, S. 533–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Geoffrey, 1995: The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union, in: International Organization 49, S. 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genschel, Philipp, 1997: How Fragmentation Can Improve Co-ordination. Setting Standards in International Telecommunications, in: Organization Studies 18, S. 603–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giering, Klaus, 1997: Vielfalt in Einheit — die Flexibilisierung der europäischen Integration, in: Europa Institut Zürich (Hrsg.), Die Europäische Union — Wesen, Struktur, Dynamik, Zürich: Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag, S. 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub, Jonathan, 1996a: Sovereignty and Subsidiarity in EU Environmental Policy, in: Political Studies 44, S. 686–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub, Jonathan, 1996b: State Power and Institutional Influence in European Integration: Lessons from the Packaging Waste Directive, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 34, S. 313–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grande, Edgar, 2000: Post-National Democracy in Europe, in: Michael Th. Greven and Louis W. Pauly (Hrsg.), Democracy Beyond the State? The European Dilemma and the Emerging Global Order, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, S. 115–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greven, Michael Th., 2000: Can the European Union Finally Become a Democracy?, in: Michael Th. Greven and Louis W. Pauly (Hrsg.), Democracy Beyond the State? The European Dilemma and the Emerging Global Order, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, S. 35–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, Sverker, 2000: What Makes a European Monetary Union Without a Parallel Fiscal Union Politically Sustainable? Ms. Department of Political Science, Uppsala University.

  • Haan, Jacob de and Sylvester C.W. Eijffinger, 2000: The Democratic Accountability of the European Central Bank: A Comment on Two Fairy-Tales, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 38, S. 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardiman, Niamh, 2000: From Conflict to Coordination: Economic Governance and Political Innovation in Ireland. Ms. Politics Department, University College Dublin.

  • Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona and Helen Wallace, 1997: The Council of Ministers, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, Adrienne, 1999: Policy-Making and Diversity in Europe. Escaping Deadlock, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Stanley, 1966: Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe, in: Daedalus 95, S. 892–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Stanley, 1982: Reflections on the Nation-State in Western Europe Today, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 21, S. 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, Markus und Beate Kohler-Koch (Hrsg.), 1996: Europäische Integration, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, Christian and Jürgen Neyer, 1997: Transforming Strategic Interaction into Deliberative Problem Solving: European Comitology in the Foodstuffs Sector, in: Journal of European Public Policy 4, S. 609–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, Christian and Ellen Vos (Hrsg.), 1999: EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics, Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamppeter, Werner, 2000: Lessons of European Integration, Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, Beate and Rainer Eising (Hrsg.), 1999: The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladeur, Karlheinz, 1992: Die Autonomie der Bundesbank — ein Beispiel für die institutionelle Verarbeitung von Ungewißheitsbedingungen, in: Staatswissenschaft und Staatspraxis 4, S. 486–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPalombara, Joseph, 1964: Interest Groups in Italian Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, Earl, 1952: The Group Basis of Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibfried, Stephan and Paul Pierson (Hrsg.), 1995: European Social Policy. Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC: Brookings.

  • Lewis, Jeffrey, 2000: The Methods of Community in EU Decision-Making and Administrative Rivalry in the Council’s Infrastructure, in: Journal of European Public Policy 7, S. 261–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend, 1999: Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E., 1977: Politics and Markets. The World’s Political-Economic Systems, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, Frederick K., 1996: The European Union, the United Nations, and the Revival of Confederal Governance, London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, Cristopher, 1998: Democracy in the European Union. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, Giandomenico, 1989: Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, Giandomenico (Hrsg.), 1996: Regulating Europe, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Gary and Doug McAdam, 1996: Social Movements and the Changing Structure of Political Opportunity in the European Union, in: Gary Marks et al., Governance in the European Union, London: Sage, S. 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooghe and Kermit Blank, 1996: European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-Level Governance, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 27, S. 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazey, Sonja and Jeremy Richardson (Hrsg.), 1993: Lobbying in the European Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, Grant, 1966: Private Power and American Democracy, New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright, 1965: The Power Elite, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew, 1993: Preferences and Power in the European Community. A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 31, S. 473–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew, 1998: The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaidis, Kalypso and Robert Howse (Hrsg.) (forthcoming): The Federal Vision. Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Olson, Mancur, 1965: The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, Martin, 1998: Collaborative Federalism. Economic Reform in Australia in the 1990s, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Mark A., 1997: Representing Diffuse Interests in EC Policy-Making, in: Journal of European Public Policy 4, S. 572–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Mark A., 2000: The End of Creeping Competence? EU Policy-Making Since Maastricht, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 38, S. 519–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Anatol and Melvin J. Guyer, 1966: A Taxonomy of 2 × 2 Games, in: General Systems 11, S. 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Anatol, Melvin J. Guyer and David G. Gordon, 1976: The 2×2 Game, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, William H., 1964: Federalism. Origin, Operation, Significance, Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, Charles F., 1995: Learning by Monitoring. The Institutions of Economic Development, in: Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg (Hrsg.), Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton: Princeton University Press, S. 137–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, Wayne and Alec Stone Sweet (Hrsg.), 1998: European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, Wayne, 1999: European Integration and Supranational Governance Revisited: Rejoinder to Branch and Øhrgaard, in: Journal of European Public Policy 6, S. 144–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbragia, Alberta M., 1992: Introduction, in: Alberta M. Sbragia (Hrsg.), Euro-Politics. Institutions and Policymaking in the „New“ European Community, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, S. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbragia, Alberta M., 1993: The European Community: A Balancing Act, in: Publius 23 (Summer 1993), S. 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W., 1988: The Joint Decision Trap. Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration, in: Public Administration 66, S. 239–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W., 1991: Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W., 1997: Introduction: The Problem-Solving Capacity of Multi-Level Governance, in: Journal of European Public Policy 4, S. 520–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W., 1998: Globalisierung als Beschränkung der Handlungsmöglichkeiten nationalstaatlicher Politik, in: Jahrbuch für neue politische Ökonomie 17, S. 41–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W., 1999: Regieren in Europa. Effektiv und demokratisch?, Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W., 2000a: Institutions in Comparative Policy Research, in: Comparative Political Studies 33, S. 762–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W., 2000b: Interdependence and Democratic Legitimation, in: Susan J. Pharr and Robert D. Putnam (Hrsg.), Disaffected Democracies. What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, Princeton: Princeton University Press, S. 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W., 2000c: Interaktionsformen. Akteurzentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung. UTB für Wissenschaft, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. and Vivien A. Schmidt (Hrsg.), 2000a: Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. Vol. 1: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. (Hrsg.), 2000b: Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. Vol. 2: Diverse Responses to Common Challenges, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer, 1999: Deliberativer Supranationalismus. Demokratisches Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaats, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 6, S. 185–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G., 2000: Der konsoziative Staat. Hypothesen zur politischen Struktur und zum politischen Leistungsprofil der Europäischen Union, in: Edgar Grande und Markus Jachtenfuchs (Hrsg.), Wie problemlösungsfähig ist die EU? Regieren im europäischen Mehrebenensystem.

  • Schmidt, Susanne K., 1998: Commission Activism. Subsuming Telecommunications and Electricity under European Competition Law, in: Journal of European Public Policy 5, S. 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Vivien A., 1999: European Federalism and Its Encroachments on National Institutions, in: Publius 29, S. 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe, 1996: Imagining the Future of the Euro-Polity with the Help of New Concepts, in: Gary Marks, Fritz W. Scharpf, Philippe C. Schmitter and Wolfgang Streeck, Governance in the European Union, London: Sage, S. 121–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe C. and Gerhard Lehmbruch (Hrsg.), 1979: Trends Toward Corporatist Intermeditation, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, Hans-Werner, 1994: How Much Europe? Subsidiarity, Centralization and Fiscal Competition, in: Scottish Journal of Political Economy 41, S. 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, Stefan, 1993: The Taming of Leviathan. Competition Among Governments, in: Constitutional Political Economy 3, S. 177–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda, 1987: A Society without a ’state’? Political Organization, Social Conflict, and Welfare Provision in the United States, in: Journal of Public Policy 7, S. 349–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang, 1995: From Market Making to State Building? Reflections on the Political Economy of European Social Policy, in: Stephan Leibfried and Paul Pierson (Hrsg.), European Social Policy. Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC: Brookings, S. 389–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang, 1997: Industrial Citizenship under Regime Competition: The Case of the European Works Council, in: Journal of European Public Policy 4, S. 643–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truman, David B., 1951: The Governmental Process. Political Interests and Public Opinion, New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, George, 1994: The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter, in: American Political Science Review 88, S. 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, Viktor and Wolfgang Kerber, 1994: Institutional Competition among Jurisdictions: An Evolutionary Approach, in: Constitutional Polical Economy 5, S. 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdun, Amy, 1996: An „Asymmetrical“ Economic and Monetary Union in the EU. Perceptions of Monetary Authorities and Social Partners, in: Journal of European Integration 20, S. 59–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdun, Amy, 2000: European Responses to Globalization and Financial Market Integration. Perceptions of Economic and Monetary Union in Britain, France and Germany, Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, Jelle and Anton C. Hemerijck, 2001: Learning Ahead of Failure: A Research Agenda. Ms. Universität Amsterdam.

  • Walker, Neil, 1998: Sovereignty and Differentiated Integration in the European Union, in: European Law Journal 4, S. 355–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, William, 1982: Europe as a Confederation: The Community and the Nation State, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 21, S. 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph H.H., 1982: The Community System: The Dual Character of Supranationalism, in: Yearbook of European Law 1, S. 257–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph H.H., 1999: Epilogue: „Comitology“ as Revolution — Infranationalism, Constitutionalism and Democracy, in: Christian Joerges and Ellen Vos (Hrsg.), EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics, Oxford: Hart, S. 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, Wolfgang, 1990: Administrative Interaction, in: William Wallace (Hrsg.), The Dynamics of European Integration, London: Pinter, S. 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, Wolfgang, 1997: An Ever Closer Fusion? A Dynamic Maropolitical View on Integration Processes, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 35, S. 267–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Dieter, 2000: Regelungsbefolgung auf verschiedenen politischen Ebenen. Wird nationales Recht wirklich besser befolgt als internationales Recht?, in: Jan W. van Deth und Thomas König (Hrsg.), Europäische Politikwissenschaft: Ein Blick in die Werkstatt, Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, S. 281–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziltener, Patrick, 2001: Wirtschaftliche Effekte der europäischen Integration — Theoriebildung und empirische Forschung. Ms. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, Michael, 1992: Interessen und Strukturen. Grundlegung und Anwendungen des situationsstrukturellen Ansatzes, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, Michael, 2000: Introduction — Law and Compliance at Different Levels. Ms. Center for European Law and Policy, Universität Bremen.

Download references

Authors
  1. Fritz W. Scharpf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Der Artikel ist die erweiterte und übersetzte Fassung einer Vorlesung anlässlich der Verleihung des Johan Skytte Preises für Politikwissenschaft am 30. September 2000 an der Universität Uppsala. Englischer Titel: Notes Toward a Theory of Multilevel Governing in Europe. Übersetzt von Hans-Jörg Schmedes und Arndt Wonka.

Fritz W. Scharpf, Direktor des Max-Planck-Instituts für Gesellschaftsforschung, Paulstraße 3, 50676 Köln

About this article

Cite this article

Scharpf, F.W. Regieren im europäischen Mehrebenensystem — Ansätze zu einer Theorie. Leviathan 30, 65–92 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11578-002-0011-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11578-002-0011-8

Search

Navigation