Skip to main content
Log in

RIS-PACS, patient safety, and clinical risk management

  • COMPUTER APPLICATIONS
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Clinical risk management is the basis of safety procedures also in radiological workflows. In the literature, it has been documented that the incidence of reconciled radiological studies ranges between 0.2 and 0.5 % of stored studies, a non-negligible value if we consider the high number of diagnostic tests performed.

Materials and methods

In radiology, “non-compliance” or, more generally, data to be reconciled means any circumstance in which wrong information is recorded in RIS and/or PACS, which requires processing to amend or correct images, reports or other information in order to attribute them to the right patient/episode. Non-compliance corrections account for almost 50 % of the medical system administrator’s (SA) workload. This paper describes how the Reggio Emilia Province Diagnostic Imaging and Laboratory Medicine Department manages risk in clinical radiology, in compliance with Regional indications on RIS-PACS safety. A dedicated RIS webpage has been developed in order to manage reconciliation requests. Native integration with PACS makes information about ongoing reconciliations available to anyone who consults the images.

Results

In 2013, non-compliances reported by radiology staff ranged between 0.25 and 0.35 % of studies sent to the PACS. More than 50 % of non-compliances can be related to high clinical risk, which requires implementation of efficient and effective rapid mechanisms of action–reaction inside and outside the radiology department.

Conclusions

The RIS-integrated module has been the starting point for managing and monitoring errors, allowing improvement initiatives to guarantee and optimise workflow. Request and event traceability have allowed us to define personalised training programmes, designed to minimise procedural and/or systematic errors. To protect the availability and consistency of information produced by radiology units, it is necessary to provide integrated and effective mechanisms for reconciliation management. The integrated tool described in this paper is now widely used (not only by our centre): radiographers and radiologists can indicate non-compliances in an efficient and effective manner, informing all the operators involved with just a click of the mouse. Similar functionality should be implemented in the next generation of RIS-PACS in order to maintain the highest possible safety level for patients and workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Golfieri R, Pescarini L, Fileni A et al (2010) Clinical risk management in radiology. Part I: general background and types of error and their prevention. Radiol Med 115:1121–1146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reiner BI (2011) Medical imaging data reconciliation, Part 1: innovation opportunity. J Am Coll Radiol 8(9):622–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Centonze M, Visconti D, Doratiotto S (2010) Clinical risk management in radiology. Part II: applied examples and concluding remarks. Radiol Med 115:1147–1164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reiner BI (2011) Medical imaging data reconciliation, Part 3: reconciliation of historical and current radiology report data. J Am Coll Radiol 8:768–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lobo-Stratton G, Mercer T, Polman R (2006) Patient exam data reconciliation tool. J Digit Imaging 19:60–65

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nitrosi A, Bertolini M, Notari P (2013) Efficiency and effectiveness of an innovative RIS function for patient information reconciliation directly integrated with PACS. J Digit Imaging 26:412–418

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reiner BI (2011) Medical imaging data reconciliation, Part 2: clinical order entry and imaging report dData reconciliation. J Am Coll Radiol 8:720–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Regione Emilia Romagna (2009) Agenzia sanitaria e sociale regionale—Delibera Giunta regionale n. 1706 del 09 novembre 2009—All. 3 “Identificazione del paziente—Indicazioni per lo sviluppo di prassi e strategie nelle Strutture Sanitarie pubbliche e accreditate della Regione Emilia-Romagna”. http://assr.regione.emilia-romagna.it/it/aree_attivita/valutazione-assistenza/sicurezza/miglioramento/dgr_2009_1706.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2014

  9. Regione Emilia Romagna (2012) Agenzia sanitaria e sociale regionale—Delibera Giunta regionale n. 1717 del 19 novembre 2012 “Requisiti specifici per l’accreditamento delle strutture radiologiche”. http://assr.regione.emilia-romagna.it/it/servizi/pubblicazioni/legislazione-e-atti-amministrativi/requisiti-accreditamento/requisiti-specifici/req-s-radiologia. Accessed 12 June 2014

  10. Garante per la protezione dei dati personale, Misure e accorgimenti prescritti ai titolari dei trattamenti effettuati con strumenti elettronici relativamente alle attribuzioni delle funzioni di amministratore di sistema del 27 novembre 2008—G.U. n. 300 del 24 dicembre 2008

  11. IHE Technical Framework (2014) Volume I, Integration Profiles. http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/ihe_tf_rev8.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2014

  12. Moody G (2010) How do you make a Pentaho? Computerworld UK May 5

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Nitrosi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nitrosi, A., Bertolini, M., Sghedoni, R. et al. RIS-PACS, patient safety, and clinical risk management. Radiol med 120, 498–503 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0483-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0483-z

Keywords

Navigation