Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unique Determination of Some Homoplasies at Hybridization Events

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships may be represented by rooted acyclic directed graphs in which each vertex, corresponding to a taxon, possesses a genome. Assume the characters are all binary. A homoplasy occurs if a particular character changes its state more than once in the graph. A vertex is “regular” if it has only one parent and “hybrid” if it has more than one parent. A “regular path” is a directed path such that all vertices after the first are regular. Assume that the network is given and that the genomes are known for all leaves and for the root. Assume that all homoplasies occur only at hybrid vertices and each character has at most one homoplasy. Assume that from each vertex there is a regular path leading to a leaf. In this idealized setting, with other mild assumptions, it is proved that the genome at each vertex is uniquely determined. Hence, for each character the vertex at which a homoplasy occurs in the character is uniquely determined. Without the assumption on regular paths, an example shows that the genomes and homoplasies need not be uniquely determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandelt, H.-J., Dress, A., 1986. Reconstructing the shape of a tree from observed dissimilarity data. Adv. Appl. Math. 7, 309–343.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bandelt, H.-J., Dress, A., 1992. Split decomposition: A new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1, 242–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroni, M., Semple, C., Steel, M., 2004. A framework for representing reticulate evolution. Ann. Comb. 8, 391–408.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Camin, J.H., Sokal, R.R., 1965. A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution 19, 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 2006. Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan Gusfield, Gusfield, D., 1991. Efficient algorithms for inferring evolutionary history. Networks 21, 19–28.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dan Gusfield, Satish Eddhu, and Charles Langley, Gusfield, D., Eddhu, S., Langley, C., 2004a. Optimal, efficient reconstruction of phylogenetic networks with constrained recombination. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 2, 173–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dan Gusfield, Satish Eddhu, and Charles Langley, Gusfield, D., Eddhu, S., Langley, C., 2004b. The fine structure of galls in phylogenetic networks. INFORMS J. Comput. 16, 459–469. Special Issue on Computational Molecular Biology. Bioinformatics.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, J., 1990. Reconstructing evolution of sequences subject to recombination using parsimony. Math. Biosci. 98, 185–200.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, J., 1993. A heuristic method to reconstruct the history of sequences subject to recombination. J. Mol. Evol. 36, 396–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, K.T., Moulton, V., 2006. Phylogenetic networks from multi-labelled trees. J. Math. Biol. 52, 613–632.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, K.T., Oxelman, B., Lott, M., Moulton, V., 2006. Reconstructing the evolutionary history of polyploids from multilabeled trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 1784–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moret, B.M.E., Nakhleh, L., Warnow, T., Linder, C.R., Tholse, A., Padolina, A., Sun, J., Timme, R., 2004. Phylogenetic networks: Modeling, reconstructibility, and accuracy. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 1, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakhleh, L., Warnow, T., Linder, C.R., 2004. Reconstructing reticulate evolution in species—theory and practice. In: Bourne, P.E., Gusfield, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB ′04, March 27–31, 2004, San Diego, California), ACM, New York, pp. 337–346.

  • Semple, C., Steel, M., 2003. Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Zhang, K., Zhang, L., 2001. Perfect phylogenetic networks with recombination. J. Comput. Biol. 8, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willson, S.J., 2006a. Unique solvability of certain hybrid networks from their distances. Ann. Combin. 10, 165–178.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Willson, S.J., 2006b. Unique reconstruction of tree-like phylogenetic networks from distances between leaves. Bull. Math. Biol. 68, 919–944.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen J. Willson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Willson, S.J. Unique Determination of Some Homoplasies at Hybridization Events. Bull. Math. Biol. 69, 1709–1725 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-006-9187-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-006-9187-4

Keywords

Navigation