Skip to main content
Log in

Research and Theory as Necessary Tools for Organizational Training and Performance Improvement Practitioners

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human Performance Technology (HPT) is the applied study and practice of improving organizational performance through training and non-training interventions. For practitioners working in this area that identify themselves as an HPT practitioner, organizational training and performance (OTP) specialist, or instructional designer—offering the right intervention set requires understanding of how humans work and function internally and within organizations that are bounded by environmental, societal, and economic realities. The HPT field is rooted in a multi-disciplinary knowledge base and has its own models and theories, which are generally developed by practitioners to guide their practice. Because HPT follows a systematic, data-driven process akin to action research, HPT practitioners are applied researchers even if they do not see themselves as such. What we need is more collaboration between scholars, practitioners, professional associations, and businesses to create a culture of engagement and involve everybody in the validation of applied research and theory development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson, A. D., & Schaffer, S. (2004). Guest editors’ introduction workplace learning and performance improvement. TechTrends, 48(2), 2–2. doi:10.1007/bf02762531.

  • Conn, C. A., & Gitonga, J. (2004). The status of training and performance research in the AECT journals. TechTrends, 48(2), 16–21. doi:10.1007/BF02762538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, P. J. (1997). Dale Brethower: The knowledge base of human performance technology. In P. J. Dean & D. E. Ripley (Eds.), Performance improvement pathfinders: Models for organizational learning systems (65–83). Washington, DC: The International Society for Performance Improvement. ISBN: 0-9616690-9-8.

  • Dean, P. J., & Ripley, D. E. (Eds.). (1997). Performance improvement pathfinders: Models for organizational learning systems. Washington, DC: The International Society for Performance Improvement. ISBN: 0-9616690-9-8.

  • Duan, M. (2014). Examining the applicability of action research in the practice of human performance technology: Evidence from exemplary cases (Order No. 3621874). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1545896634). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.indiana.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1545896634?accountid=11620.

  • Galbraith, J. (1985). The new industrial state (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. F. (1978). Human competence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harless, J. (1970). An ounce of analysis (is worth a pound of objectives). Newman: Harless Performance Guild.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huglin, L., Johnsen, L., & Marker, A. (2007). Research priorities in performance technology: a Delphi study. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(1), 79–95. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2007.tb00433.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Berett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. D. (2002). Empirical Research on Performance Improvement. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(1), 99–110. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2002.tb00243.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. D. (2010). Research on performance improvement: Where’s the beef? Performance Improvement, 49(2), 5–7. doi:10.1002/pfi.20126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. D., & Fox, E. J. (2004). Performance improvement competencies for instructional technologists. TechTrends, 48(2), 22–25. doi:10.1007/BF02762539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marker, A., Huglin, L., & Johnsen, L. (2006). Empirical research on performance improvement: an update. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(4), 7–22. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2006.tb00383.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. (2013). State of the industry report. ASTD Research.

  • Molenda, M., & Pershing, J. A. (2004). The strategic impact model: an integrative approach to performance improvement and instructional systems design. TechTrends, 48(2), 26–32. doi:10.1007/bf02762540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pershing, J. A. (2006). Human performance technology fundamentals. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology (3rd ed., pp. 5–34). San Francisco: Pfeifer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pershing, J. A. (2016). Looking back to look forward: pathfinders no. 1: behaviorism as a beginning. Performance Improvement, 55(1), 37–38. doi:10.1002/pfi.21551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pershing, J. A., Abaci, S., & Symonette, S. (2016). A treatise on the field of human performance technology: The need for a scholars’ guild. Performance Improvement, 55(7), 6–14. doi:10.1002/pfi.21604.

  • Research. (n.d.). In Meriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/research.

  • Stock, B. (1996). Getting to the heart of performance. Performance and Instruction, 35(8), 6–8. doi:10.1002/pfi.4170350805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolovitch, H. D. (2000). Human performance technology: research and theory to practice. Performance Improvement, 39(4), 7–15. doi:10.1002/pfi.4140390407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, R. A. (1997). HRD research: Don’t go to work without it. In R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton III (Eds.), Human resource development research handbook (pp. 3–20). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, R. A. (1999). The foundations of performance improvement and implications for practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 1(1), 1–25. doi:10.1177/152342239900100102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tiem, D., Moseley, J. L., & Dessinger, J. C. (2012). Fundamentals of performance improvement: Optimizing results through people, process, and organizations (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wile, D. (1996). Why doers do. Performance and Instruction, 35(2), 30–35. doi:10.1002/pfi.4170350209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmoth, F. S., Prigmore, C., & Bray, M. (2010). HPT models: An overview of the major models in the field. In R. Watkins & D. Leigh (Eds.), Handbook of improving performance in the workplace, volume two: Selecting and implementing performance interventions (pp. 5–23). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serdar Abaci.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abaci, S., Pershing, J.A. Research and Theory as Necessary Tools for Organizational Training and Performance Improvement Practitioners. TechTrends 61, 19–25 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0123-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0123-7

Keywords

Navigation