Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Two Indices of Availability of Fruits/Vegetable and Fast Food Outlets

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of food environment often examine single dimensions of areas that may not account for complexity of exposure to all food sources. With respect to the deprivation amplification hypothesis, particular needs are to assess whether relative or absolute measures of the food environment are related to characteristics of social environment. The objective of this study was to compare absolute availability (AA) of fast food outlets (FFO) and stores selling fresh fruits and vegetables (FVS) with the relative availability (RA) of the same food sources in relation to area-level poverty and ethnic diversity in 248 selected census tracts (CT) in Montreal, Canada. AA of FFO and FVS were expressed as areal densities of food sources within CTs. RA indices were calculated as the proportion of FVSs relative to total food stores and the proportion of FFOs relative to all restaurants within CTs, respectively. Whereas the AA of FFO was positively associated with area-level poverty and ethnic diversity, the RA of FFO was inversely associated with area-level poverty and not associated with ethnic diversity. Both measures of FVS were positively associated with area-level poverty and ethnic diversity. These findings do not support a model of deprivation amplification. Furthermore, results of FFO suggest that the alternate measure of RA can complement information based on AA indicators of the food environment, with potential utility in predicting eating practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Story M, Kaphingst KM, Robinson-O’Brien R, Glanz K. Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008; 29(1): 253–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Macintyre S. Deprivation amplification revisited: or, is it always true that poorer places have poorer access to resources for healthy diets and physical activity? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007; 4(1): 32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fraser L, Edwards K, Cade J, Clarke G. The geography of fast food outlets: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010; 7: 2290–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaulac J, Kristjansson E, Cummins S. A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009; 6(3).

  5. Daniel M, Kestens Y, Paquet C. Demographic and urban form correlates of healthful and unhealthful food availability in Montreal, Canada. Can J Public Health. 2009; 100(3): 189–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Apparicio P, Cloutier MS, Shearmur R. The case of Montreal’s missing food deserts: evaluation of accessibility to food supermarkets. Int J Health Geogr. 2007; 6(4).

  7. Bertrand L, Therrien F, Cloutier MS. Measuring and mapping disparities in access to fresh fruits and vegetables in Montreal. Can J Public Health. 2008; 99(1): 6–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Charreire H, Casey R, Salze P, et al. Measuring the food environment using geographical information systems: a methodological review. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13: 1773–1785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gallagher M. Examining the impact of food deserts on public health in Chicago. Chicago: Mari Gallagher Research and Consulting Group, 2006. www.marigallagher.com/site_media/dynamic/project_files/1_ChicagoFoodDesertReport-Full_.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2010.

  10. Mehta NK, Chang VW. Weight status and restaurant availability: a multilevel analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 34: 127–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. California Centre for Public Health Advocacy, Policy Link, the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. Designed for disease: the link between local food environments and obesity and diabetes. Davis, CA. 2008. www.healthpolicy.ucla.edu/pubs/files/Designed_for_Disease_050108.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2010.

  12. Spence J, Cutumisu N, Edwards J, Raine K, Smoyer-Tomic K. Relation between local food environments and obesity among adults. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9: 192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matthews SA, Moudon AV, Daniel M. Work Group II: using geographic information systems for enhancing research relevant to policy on diet, physical activity, and weight. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(4S): S171–S176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gaudreau P, Morais JA, Shatenstein B, et al. Nutrition as a determinant of successful aging: description of the Quebec longitudinal study Nuage and results from cross-sectional pilot studies. Rejuvenation Res. 2007; 10: 377–386.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Payette H, Gueye N, Gaudreau P, et al. Trajectories of physical function decline and psychological functioning: the Québec Longitudinal Study on Nutrition and Successful Aging (NuAge). J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011; 66B(S1): i82–i90.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paquet C, Daniel M, Kestens Y, Leger K, Gauvin L. Field validation of listings of food stores and commercial physical activity establishments from secondary data. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5: 58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kestens Y, Lebel A, Daniel M, Thériault M, Pampalon R. Using experienced activity spaces to measure foodscape exposure. Health Place. 2010; 16: 1094–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Silverman BW. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jonckheere AR. A distribution-free k-sample test against ordered alternatives. Biometrika. 1954; 41: 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Terpstra TJ. The asymptotic normality and consistency of Kendall’s test against trend, when ties are present in one ranking. Indagationes Mathematicae. 1952; 14: 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pouliot N, Hamelin A. Disparities in fruit and vegetable supply: a potential health concern in the greater Québec City area. Public Health Nutr. 2009; 12: 2051–2059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geneviève Mercille.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mercille, G., Richard, L., Gauvin, L. et al. Comparison of Two Indices of Availability of Fruits/Vegetable and Fast Food Outlets. J Urban Health 90, 240–245 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9722-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9722-6

Keywords

Navigation