Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Post-stimulation block of frog sciatic nerve by high-frequency (kHz) biphasic stimulation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study determined if high-frequency biphasic stimulation can induce nerve conduction block that persists after the stimulation is terminated, i.e., post-stimulation block. The frog sciatic nerve-muscle preparation was used in the study. Muscle contraction force induced by low-frequency (0.5 Hz) nerve stimulation was recorded to indicate the occurrence and recovery of nerve block induced by the high-frequency (5 or 10 kHz) biphasic stimulation. Nerve block was observed during high-frequency stimulation and after termination of the stimulation. The recovery from post-stimulation block occurred in two distinct phases. During the first phase, the complete block induced during high-frequency stimulation was maintained. The average maximal duration for the first phase was 107 ± 50 s. During the second phase, the block gradually or abruptly reversed. The duration of both first and second phases was dependent on stimulation intensity and duration but not frequency. Stimulation of higher intensity (1.4–2 times block threshold) and longer duration (5 min) produced the longest period (249 ± 58 s) for a complete recovery. Post-stimulation block can be induced by high-frequency biphasic stimulation, which is important for future investigations of the blocking mechanisms and for optimizing the stimulation parameters or protocols in clinical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gervason C, Hoffmann D, Gao DM, Hommel M, Perret JE, de Rougemont J (1991) Long-term suppression of tremor by chronic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus. Lancet 337:403–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhadra N, Kilgore KL (2005) High-frequency electrical conduction block of mammalian peripheral motor nerve. Muscle Nerve 32:782–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhadra N, Kilgore KL (2014) Reversible nerve conduction block using kilohertz frequency alternating current. Neuromodulation 17:242–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowman BR, McNeal DR (1986) Response of single alpha motoneurons to high-frequency pulse trains. Firing behavior and conduction block phenomenon. Appl Neurophysiol 49:121–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Couto J, Grill WM (2016) Kilohertz frequency deep brain stimulation is ineffective at regularizing the firing of model thalamic neurons. Front Comput Neurosci 10:22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cuellar JM, Alataris K, Walker A, Yeomans DC, Antognini JF (2013) Effect of high-frequency alternating current on spinal afferent nociceptive transmission. Neuromodulation 16:318–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frankenhaeuser B, Huxley AF (1964) The action potential in the myelinated nerve fibre of Xenopus laevis as computed on the basis of voltage clamp data. J Physiol 171:302–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaunt RA, Prochazka A (2009) Transcutaneously coupled, high-frequency electrical stimulation of the pudendal nerve blocks external urethral sphincter contractions. Neurorehab Neural Repair 23:615–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117:500–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Joseph L, Butera R (2009) Unmyelinated aplysia nerves exhibit a nonmonotonic blocking response to high-frequency stimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 17:537–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Joseph L, Butera R (2011) High-frequency stimulation selectively blocks different types of fibers in frog sciatic nerve. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 19:550–557

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kilgore KL, Bhadra N (2004) Nerve conduction block utilising high-frequency alternating current. Med Biol Eng Comput 42:394–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu H, Zhu L, Sheng S, Sun L, Zhou H, Tang H, Qiu T (2013) Post stimulus effects of high frequency biphasic electrical current on a fibre’s conductibility in isolated frog nerves. J Neural Eng 10:036024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rattay F (1989) Analysis of models for extracellular fiber stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 36:676–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rattay F, Aberham M (1993) Modeling axon membranes for functional electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 40:1201–1209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reboul J, Rosenblueth A (1939) The action of alternating currents upon the electrical excitability of nerve. Am J Physiol 125:205–215

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenblueth A, Reboul J (1939) The blocking and deblocking effects of alternating currents on nerve. Am J Physiol 125:251–264

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sarr MG, Billington CJ, Brancatisano R, Brancatisano A, Toouli J, Kow L, Nguyen NT, Blackstone R, Maher JW, Shikora S, Reeds DN, Eagon JC, Wolfe BM, O’Rourke RW, Fujioka K, Takata M, Swain JM, Morton JM, Ikramuddin S, Schweitzer M, Chand B, Rosenthal R (2012) The EMPOWER study: randomized, prospective, double-blind, multicenter trial of vagal blockade to induce weight loss in morbid obesity. Obes Surg 22:1771–1782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Soin A, Shah NS, Fang ZP (2015) High-frequency electrical nerve block for postamputation pain: a pilot study. Neuromodulation 18:197–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tai C, de Groat WC, Roppolo JR (2005) Simulation analysis of conduction block in unmyelinated axons induced by high-frequency biphasic electrical currents. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52:1323–1332

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tai C, Roppolo JR, de Groat WC (2004) Block of external urethral sphincter contraction by high frequency electrical stimulation of pudendal nerve. J Urol 172:2069–2072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanner JA (1962) Reversible blocking of nerve conduction by alternating current excitation. Nature 195:712–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Waataja J, Tweden K, Honda C (2011) Effects of high-frequency alternating current on axonal conduction through the vagus nerve. J Neural Eng 8:056013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang X, Roppolo JR, de Groat WC, Tai C (2006) Mechanism of nerve conduction block induced by high-frequency biphasic electrical currents. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53:2445–2454

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by NIH/NIDDK under Grants DK-068566.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changfeng Tai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, G., Xiao, Z., Wang, J. et al. Post-stimulation block of frog sciatic nerve by high-frequency (kHz) biphasic stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 55, 585–593 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1539-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1539-0

Keywords

Navigation