Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Facilitation in Online and Offline Gambling: A Pilot Study

  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To date, there has been relatively little research on Internet gambling. Furthermore, there have been few studies comparing the behaviour of Internet gamblers versus non-Internet gamblers. Using the game of roulette, this study experimentally examined (a) the differences in gambling behaviour between online and offline gamblers, and (b) the role social facilitation in gambling behaviour between online and offline gamblers. A total of 38 participants played online and offline roulette either alone or alongside another gambling participant, and the players’ chip placement and amount bet was recorded. The study found that those who gambled in online roulette placed more chips per bet and made riskier bets than those who gambled on roulette offline. The study also found that those who gambled alongside another gambler placed more chips and made riskier bets than those who gambled alone. Those who gambled online and in the presence of others, placed the highest number of chips per bet and made the riskiest bets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1993). Tolerance in gambling: an objective measure using the psychophysiological analysis of male fruit machine gamblers. Addictive Behaviors, 18, 365–372.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths M. D. (2001). Internet gambling: preliminary results of the first UK prevalence study. Journal of Gambling Issues 5: Available at: http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue5/research/griffiths_article.html (Last accessed January 4, 2009).

  • Griffiths, M. D. (2003). Internet gambling: issues, concerns, and recommendations. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 557–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2002). The social impact of internet gambling. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2003). The environmental psychology of gambling. In G. Reith (Ed.), Gambling: Who wins? Who Loses? (pp. 277–292). New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2007). Betting on the couch: a thematic analysis of Internet gambling using case studies. Social Psychological Review, 9(2), 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., & Barnes, A. (2008). Internet gambling: an online empirical study among student gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., Parke, A., Wood, R. T. A., & Parke, J. (2006). Internet gambling: an overview of psychosocial impacts. Gaming Research and Review Journal, 27(1), 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., Wardle, J., Orford, J., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2009). Socio-demographic correlates of internet gambling: findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 199–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardoon, K. K., & Derevensky, J. L. (2001). Social influences involved in children’s gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 191–196.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. T., & Petry, N. M. (2002). Disordered gambling among university-based medical and dental patients: a focus on internet gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 76–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). South oaks gambling screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G., Hayer, T., & Griffiths, M. D. (2009). Problem gambling in Europe: challenges, prevention, and interventions. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B., Bryant, B., & Driskell, J. E. (1997). Presence of others and arousal: an integration. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockloff M. J. (2008). Crowd size impacts on gaming intensity: The moderating effect of social facilitation on EGM betting behaviour. Paper presented at National Association for Gambling Studies Annual Conference, Adelaide. December.

  • Rockloff, M. J., & Dyer, V. (2007). An experiment on the social facilitation of gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sproston, K., Erens, B., & Orford, J. (2000). Gambling behaviour in Britain, results from the British gambling prevalence survey. London: National Centre For Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., & Wood, R. T. (2007). Internet Gambling: a comprehensive review and synthesis of the literature. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

  • Wood, R. T. A., Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2007). The acquisition, development, and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 354–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark D. Griffiths.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cole, T., Barrett, D.J.K. & Griffiths, M.D. Social Facilitation in Online and Offline Gambling: A Pilot Study. Int J Ment Health Addiction 9, 240–247 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-010-9281-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-010-9281-6

Keywords

Navigation