Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Limited Cash Flow on Slot Machines: Effects of Prohibition of Note Acceptors on Adolescent Gambling Behaviour

  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study addresses the impact of prohibition of note acceptors on gambling behaviour and gambling problems among Norwegian adolescents. Data comprised school surveys at three time points; 2004 and 2005 (before intervention) and 2006 (after intervention). Net samples comprised 20.000 students aged 13–19 years at each data collection. Identical measures of gambling behaviour (gambling frequency and expenditures on slot machines) and indicators of problem gambling (SOGS-RA and Lie/Bet) were assessed at all three time points. No significant changes in gambling behaviour and problem gambling were observed in the period prior to the intervention, whereas slot machine gambling frequency was reduced by 20%, the proportion that gambled frequently on slot machines was reduced by 26%; overall gambling frequency was reduced by 10% and the proportion of problem gamblers (SOGS-RA 4+) was reduced by 20% after the intervention when controlling for potential confounders. It is suggested that these findings can be attributed to the removal of the note acceptors on slot machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Productivity Commission (APC) (1999). Australias Gambling Industries. Report No. 10. Canberra: Ausinfo.

  • Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, F., & Walker, M. (2001). The assessment of the impact of the configuration on electronic gaming machines as harm minimization strategies for problem gambling. (A report for the Gaming Industry Operators’s Group). Sydney: The University of Sydney Gambling Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, M., Honeyfield, N., & Whitehead, G. (2003). Change in bank note acceptors on electronic gaming machines in Queensland — Outcome evaluation. Research and Community Engagement Division; Queensland Office of Gaming Regulation.

  • Chambers, R. A., Taylor, J. R., & Potenza, M. N. (2003). Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: A critical period of addiction vulnerability. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1041–1052. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2004). Gambling problems in youth: Developmental and applied perspectives. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100(1), 1–33. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00962.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echeburua, E. B., & Fernandez-Montalvo, J. (1996). Comparative effectiveness of three therapeutic modalities in the psychological treatment of pathological gambling; Long-term outcome. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 24, 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götestam, K. G., Johansson, A., Wenzel, H. G., & Simonsen, I. E. (2004). Validation of the Lie/Bet screen for pathological gambling on two normal population data sets. Psychological Reports, 95, 1009–1013. doi:10.2466/PR0.95.7.1009-1013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1993). Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(2), 101–120. doi:10.1007/BF01014863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1995). Adolescent gambling. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grun, L., & McKeigue, P. (2000). Prevalence of excessive gambling before and after introduction of a national lottery in the United Kingdom: Another example of the single distribution theory. Addiction, 95(6), 959–966. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95695912.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. (1998). Adolescent gambling behaviour: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 319–343. doi:10.1023/A:1023068925328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M., & Rossow, I. (2008). Adolescent gambling and problem gambling: Does the total consumption model apply? Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 135–149. doi:10.1007/s10899-007-9082-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardoon, K. K., & Derevensky, J. (2002). Child and adolescent gambling behaviour: Current knowledge. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7(2), 263–281. doi:10.1177/1359104502007002012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. E., Hamer, R. M., & Nora, R. M. (1988). The lie/bet questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers: A follow-up study. Psychological Reports, 83(3 Part 2), 1219–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. E., Hamer, R., Nora, R. M., & Tan, R. (1997). The Lie/Bet questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers. Psychological Reports, 80(1), 83–88. doi:10.2466/PR0.80.1.83-88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Jaques, S., Sévigny, S., & Cantinotti, M. (2005). Impact of the format, arrangement and availability of electronic gaming machines outside casinos on gambling. International Gambling Studies, 5(2), 139–154. doi:10.1080/14459790500303121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, I. (2008). The population mean and the proportion of frequent gamblers: Is the theory of total consumption valid for gambling? Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 247–256. doi:10.1007/s10899-007-9081-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, I., & Nordlund, S. (2002). Pengespill og pengespillproblemer i Norge. Rapport nr. 2/2003. SIRUS.

  • McMillen, J., Marshall, L., & Murphy, L. (2004). The use of ATMs in ACT gaming venues: An empirical study. ANU Centre for Gambling Research.

  • Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A Hot/Cool-System of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3–19. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Ayduk, O. (2004). Willpower in a cognitive-affective processing system. In R. F. Baumeister, & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation; research, theory and applications (pp. 99–129). New York: The Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, C., & Hastings, G. (2008). Gambling with the future of young people. Addiction Research & Theory, 16(2), 107–110. doi:10.1080/16066350701851343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Gaming Authority (2006). Annual report. Førde, Norway. Retrieved Dec. 19 2008 from: http://www.lottstift.no/eway/default.aspx?pid = 236&trg = visliste_5998&MainPaige_5482 = 5609:0:8,1573&visliste_5998 = 6122:0:8,1575.

  • Norwegian Gaming Authority (2007). Annual report. Førde, Norway. Retrieved Dec. 19 2008 from: http://www.lottstift.no/eway/default.aspx?pid = 236&trg = visliste_5998&MainPaige_5482 = 5609:0:8,1573&visliste_5998 = 6122:0:8,1575.

  • Palmeri, C. (2003). Hit the jackpot? You won’t need a bucket. Business weekly only. Retrieved July 11 2008 from: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_13/b3826076.htm.

  • Pape, H., Storvoll, E. E., & Rossow, I. (2007). Report of study methodology for the school surveys 2004, 2005 and 2006 for evaluation of the Regional project carried out by the Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research. Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research. Retrieved July 11 2008 from: http://www.sirus.no/files/pub/370/metoderapport_engelsk_regionprosj.pdf.

  • Poulin, C. (2000). Problem gambling among adolescent students in the Atlantic provinces of Canada. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(1), 53–78. doi:10.1023/A:1009431417238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, C. (2002). An assessment of the validity and reliability of the SOGS-RA. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(1), 67–93. doi:10.1023/A:1014584213557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Room, R., Turner, N. E., & Ialomiteanu, A. (1999). Community effects of the opening of the Niagara casino. Addiction, 94(10), 1449–1466. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.941014492.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossow, I., & Hansen, M. (2003). Underholdning med bismak—Ungdom og pengespill. (Entertainment with a tang—Adolescent gambling). Report nr. 1–03. NOVA, Oslo.

  • Rossow, I., & Molde, H. (2006). Chasing the criteria: Comparing SOGS-RA and The Lie Bet screen to assess prevalence of problem gambling an ‘at-risk’ gambling among adolescents. Journal of Gambling Issues: Issue 18. Retrieved July 11 2008 from: http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue18/pdfs/rossow.pdf.

  • Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (1996). Estimating the prevalence of adolescent gambling disorders: A quantitative synthesis and guide toward standard gambling nomenclature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 193–214. doi:10.1007/BF01539174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (2001). Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92(3), 168–172.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & VanderBilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1369–1376. doi:10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, L., Walker, M., Coughlan, M-J., Enersen, K., & Blaszczynski, A. (2005). Structural changes to electronic gaming machines as effective harm minimization strategies for non-problem and problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(4), 503–520. doi:10.1007/s10899-005-5560-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N., & Horbay, R. (2004). How do slot machines and other electronic gambling machines actually work? Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 11. Retrieved July 11 2008 from: www.camh.net/egambling/issue11.

  • Turner, N. E., Ialomiteanu, A., & Room, R. (1999). Chequered expectations: Predictors of approval of opening a casino in the Niagara community. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 45–70. doi:10.1023/A:1023067012971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., & Wood, R. T. (2004). The proportion of gaming revenue derived from problems gamblers: Examining the issues in a Canadian context. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 4(1), 33–45. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2004.00033.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, K. C., Stinchfield, R. D., & Fulkerson, J. (1993). Toward the development of an adolescent gambling problem severity scale. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(1), 63–84. doi:10.1007/BF01019925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, K. C., Stinchfield, R. D., & Kim, L. (1995). Monitoring adolescent gambling in Minnesota. Journal of Gambling Studies, 11, 165–183. doi:10.1007/BF02107113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interests

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research, POB 565 Sentrum, 0105, Oslo, Norway

    Marianne Hansen & Ingeborg Rossow

Authors
  1. Marianne Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ingeborg Rossow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne Hansen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen, M., Rossow, I. Limited Cash Flow on Slot Machines: Effects of Prohibition of Note Acceptors on Adolescent Gambling Behaviour. Int J Ment Health Addiction 8, 70–81 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9196-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9196-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation