Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental characterization of human torso motion

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The torso plays an important role in the human-like operation of humanoids. In this paper, a method is proposed to analyze the behavior of the human torso by using inertial and magnetic sensing tools. Experiments are conducted to characterize the motion performance of the human torso during daily routine operations. Furthermore, the forces acting on the human body during these operations are evaluated to design and validate the performance of a humanoid robot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hodgins J, Raibert M H. Biped gymnastics. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1990, 9(2): 115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kavanagh J J, Morrison S, James D A, et al. Reliability of segmental accelerations measured using a new wireless gait analysis system. Journal of Biomechanics, 2006, 39(15): 2863–2872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee R Y W, Laprade J, Fung E H K. A real-time gyroscopic system for three-dimensional measurement of lumbar spine motion. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2003, 25(10): 817–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Picerno P, Cereatti A, Cappozzo A. Joint kinematics estimate using wearable inertial and magnetic sensing modules. Gait & Posture, 2008, 28(4): 588–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roland L. Huston, Principle of Biomechanics. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009

  6. Sims K. Evolving 3D morphology and behaviour by competition. Artificial Life, 1994, IV: 28–39

    Google Scholar 

  7. Virginia C. Bones and Muscles: An Illustrated Anatomy. New York: Wolf Fly Press, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu R, Zhou Z. A real-time articulated human motion tracking using tri-axis inertial/magnetic sensors package. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering: A Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004, 12 (2): 295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liang C, Ceccarelli M. Design and simulation of a waist-trunk system for a humanoid robot. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2012, 53: 50–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coley B, Najafi B, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, et al. Stair climbing detection during daily physical activity using a miniature gyroscope. Gait & Posture, 2005, 22(4): 287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Henriksen M, Lund H, Moe-Nilssen R, et al. Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. Gait & Posture, 2004, 19(3): 288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hodgins J K. Biped gait transitions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Sacramento: IEEE, 1991, 2092–2097

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bonato P. Wearable sensors/systems and their impact on biomedical engineering. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine: The Quarterly Magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, 2003, 22(3): 18–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo X L. Kay S L, Taher T. Unrestrained measurement of arm motion based on a wearable wireless sensor network. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2010, 59(5): 1309–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moe-Nilssen R, Helbostad J L. Interstride trunk acceleration variability but not step width variability can differentiate between fit and frail older adults. Gait & Posture, 2005, 21(2): 164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ceccarelli M. Fundamentals of Mechanics of Robotic Manipulation. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Meskers C G M, Fraterman H, van der Helm F C T, et al. Calibration of the “Flock of Birds” electromagnetic tracking device and its application in shoulder motion studies. Journal of Biomechanics, 1999, 32(6): 629–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carbone G, Ceccarelli M. A procedure for experimental evaluation of Cartesian stiffness matrix of multibody robotic systems. In: 15th CISM-IFToMM Symposium on Robot Design, Dynamics and Control. Montreal, 2004, 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goodvin C, Park E J, Huang K, et al. Development of a real-time three-dimensional spinal motion measurement system for clinical practice. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2006, 44(12): 1061–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hall J S, Basic Biomechanics. 6th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roetenberg D, Luinge H J, Baten C T M, et al. Compensation of magnetic disturbances improves inertial and magnetic sensing of human body segment orientation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering: A Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2005, 13(3): 395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. InterSense. http://www.intersense.com, 2015

  23. Kumar S. Trunk rotation: Ergonomic and evolutionary perspective. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2002, 3(3): 235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vinciguerra A, Aulisa L, Ceccarelli M. Stability and the elastic behavior of the spine. Minerva Orthopaedic and Trauma, 1986, 37 (11): 717–723 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Cafolla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cafolla, D., Chen, IM. & Ceccarelli, M. An experimental characterization of human torso motion. Front. Mech. Eng. 10, 311–325 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-015-0352-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-015-0352-z

Keywords

Navigation