Abstract
We apply the Monte Carlo, stochastic Galerkin, and stochastic collocation methods to solving the drift-diffusion equations coupled with the Poisson equation arising in semiconductor devices with random rough surfaces. Instead of dividing the rough surface into slices, we use stochastic mapping to transform the original deterministic equations in a random domain into stochastic equations in the corresponding deterministic domain. A finite element discretization with the help of AFEPack is applied to the physical space, and the equations obtained are solved by the approximate Newton iterative method. Comparison of the three stochastic methods through numerical experiment on different PN junctions are given. The numerical results show that, for such a complicated nonlinear problem, the stochastic Galerkin method has no obvious advantages on efficiency except accuracy over the other two methods, and the stochastic collocation method combines the accuracy of the stochastic Galerkin method and the easy implementation of the Monte Carlo method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Askey R, Wilson J. Some Basic Hypergeometric Orthogonal Polynomials that Generalize Jacobi Polynomials. Mem Amer Math Soc, No 319. Providence: Amer Math Soc, 1985
Babuška I, Tempone R, Zouraris G E. Galerkin finite element approximations of stochastic elliptic partial differential equations. SIAM J Numer Anal, 2004, 42(2): 800–825
Bäck, J, Nobile F, Tamellini L, Tempone R. Stochastic spectral Galerkin and collocation methods for PDEs with random coefficients: a numerical comparison. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spectral and High Order Methods (ICOSAHOM 09). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010
Bank R E, Rose D J. Global approximate Newton methods. Numer Math, 1981, 37: 279–295
Bank R E, Rose D J, Fichtner W. Numerical methods for semiconductor device simulation. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput, 1983, 4: 416–435
Bejan A. Shape and Structure, from Engineering to Nature. New York: Cambridge Univ Press, 2000
Bürgler J F, Bank R E, Fichtner W, Smith R K. A new discretization for the semiconductor current continuity equations. IEEE Trans Comput-Aided Design Integrat Circuits Sys, 1989, 8: 479–489
Bürgler J F, Conghran W M, Fichtner Jr W. An adaptive grid refinement strategy for the drift-diffusion equations. IEEE Trans Comput-Aided Design Integrat Circuits Sys, 1991, 10: 1251–1258
Deb M K, Babuška I M, Oden J T. Solution of stochastic partial differential equations using Galerkin finite element techniques. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engrg, 2001, 190: 6359–6372
Elman H C, Miller C W, Phipps E T, Tuminaro R S. Assessment of collocation and Galerkin approaches to linear diffusion equations with random data. Int J Uncertainty Quant, 2011, 1(1): 19–33
Fishman G. Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996
Ganapathysubramanian B, Zabaras N. Sparse grid collocation methods for stochastic natural convection problems. J Comput Phys, 2007, 225(1): 652–685
Ghanem R G, Spanos P. Stochastic Finite Elements: a Spectral Approach. New York: Springer, 1991
Li R. On multi-mesh h-adaptive methods. J Sci Comput, 2005, 24(3): 321–341
Loève M. Probability Theory. 4th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1977
Novak E, Ritter K. High dimensional integration of smooth functions over cubes. Numer Math, 1996, 75: 79–97
Novak E, Ritter K. Simple cubature formulas with high polynomial exactness. Constructive Approx, 1999, 15: 499–522
Smolyak S A. Quadrature and interpolation formulas for tensor products of certain classes of functions. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR, 1963, 148: 1042–1045 (in Russian); Soviet Math Dokl, 1963, 4: 240–243
Taur Y, Ning H. Fundamentals of Modern VLSI Devices. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, 2009
Van Trees H L. Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I. New York: Wiley, 1968
Wasilkowski G, Wozniakowski H. Explicit cost bounds of algorithms for multivariate tensor product problems. J Complexity, 1995, 11: 1–56
Wiener N. The homogeneous chaos. Amer J Math, 1938, 60: 897–936
Xiu D, Hesthaven J. High-order collocation methods for differential equations with random inputs. SIAM J Sci Comput, 2005, 27: 1118–1139
Xiu D, Karniadakis G E. The Wiener-Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J Sci Comput, 2002, 24(2): 619–644
Xiu D, Karniadakis G E. Modeling uncertainty in steady state diffusion problems via generalized polynomial chaos. Comput Methods Appl Math Engrg, 2002, 191: 4927–4948
Xiu D, Karniadakis G E. Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos. J Comput Phys, 2003, 187: 137–167
Xiu D, Tartakovsky D M. Numerical methods for differential equations in random domain. SIAM J Sci Comput, 2006, 28: 1167–1185
Yu S, Zhao Y, Zeng L, Du G, Kang J, Han R, Liu X. Impact of line-edge roughness on double-gate Schottky-barrier filed-effect transistors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2009, 56(6): 1211–1219
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, W., Lu, T. Numerical comparison of three stochastic methods for nonlinear PN junction problems. Front. Math. China 9, 659–698 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11464-013-0327-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11464-013-0327-5
Keywords
- Stochastic partial differential equation
- stochastic Galerkin method
- stochastic collocation method
- Monte Carlo method