Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Winners and losers among tree species in Xishuangbanna: which traits are most important?

  • Article
  • Life & Medical Sciences
  • Published:
Science Bulletin

Abstract

Massive human interference in natural ecosystems is resulting in a few “winners” and many “losers”. However, the drivers of this winner–loser replacement pattern remain poorly understood. The aim of the study reported here was to identify winners among the tree flora of Xishuangbanna and compare their functional traits, specific leaf area (SLA), wood density (WD), seed mass (SM) and maximum height (MH) with previously identified losers (i.e., endangered species). Fifteen native tree species were identified as winners from expert opinion, plot-based surveys of secondary forests and plotless surveys along roads. Twelve endangered tree species for which trait information could be obtained were used for comparison. Traits were compared with a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Winners had significantly higher SLA, but lower WD. SM and MH did not differ significantly between groups. When the effects of phylogeny were removed by using phylogenetic generalized least squares, the difference in SLA became marginally insignificant. Principal component analysis resulted in two overlapping groups, showing that the selected traits were insufficient to distinguish winners and losers. Our results suggest that the “few winners, many losers” paradigm applies to trees in Xishuangbanna, with 15 species accounting for most trees in the disturbed habitats sampled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tabarelli M, Peres CA, Melo FPL (2012) The “few winners and many losers” paradigm revisited: emerging prospects for tropical forest biodiversity. Biol Conserv 155:136–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiegmann SM, Waller DM (2006) Fifty years of change in northern upland forest understories: identity and traits of “winner” and “loser” plant species. Biol Conserv 129:109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanberry BB, Palik BJ, He HS (2013) Winning and losing tree species of reassembly in Minnesota’s mixed and broadleaf forests. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061709

    Google Scholar 

  5. Santos BA, Peres CA, Oliveira MA et al (2008) Drastic erosion in functional attributes of tree assemblages in Atlantic forest fragments of northeastern Brazil. Biol Conserv 141:249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Qian H, Guo Q (2010) Linking biotic homogenization to habitat type, invasiveness and growth form of naturalized alien plants in North America. Divers Distrib 16:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gurevitch J, Padilla DK (2004) Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol Evol 19:470–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hejda M (2013) Do species of invaded communities differ in their vulnerability to being eliminated by the dominant alien plants? Biol Invasions 15:1989–1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marques A, Costa C, Atman A et al (2014) Germination characteristics and seedbank of the alien species Leucaena leucocephala (Fabaceae) in Brazilian forest: ecological implications. Weed Res 54:576–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trentanovi G, Lippe M, Sitzia T et al (2013) Biotic homogenization at the community scale: disentangling the roles of urbanization and plant invasion. Divers Distrib 19:738–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davidson AM, Jennions M, Nicotra AB (2011) Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 14:419–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Richardson DM, Rejmánek M (2011) Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species—A global review. Divers Distrib 17:788–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li H, Ma Y, Aide TM et al (2008) Past, present and future land-use in Xishuangbanna, China and the implications for carbon dynamics. Forest Ecol Manag 255:16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lôbo D, Leão T, Melo FPL et al (2011) Forest fragmentation drives Atlantic forest of northeastern Brazil to biotic homogenization. Divers Distrib 17:287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Laurance WF, Delamônica P, Laurance SG et al (2000) Conservation: rainforest fragmentation kills big trees. Nature 404:836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D”Angelo SA, Andrade AC, Laurance SG et al (2004) Inferred causes of tree mortality in fragmented and intact Amazonian forests. J Trop Ecol 20:243–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olden JD, Rooney TP (2006) On defining and quantifying biotic homogenization. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bierregaard RO (2001) Lessons from Amazonia: the ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stoner KE, Vulinec K, Wright SJ et al (2007) Hunting and plant community dynamics in tropical forests: a synthesis and future directions. Biotropica 39:385–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tabarelli M, Mantovani W, Peres CA (1999) Effects of habitat fragmentation on plant guild structure in the montane Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil. Biol Conserv 91:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oliveira MA, Grillo AS, Tabarelli M (2004) Forest edge in the Brazilian Atlantic forest: drastic changes in tree species assemblages. Oryx 38:389–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Michalski F, Nishi I, Peres CA (2007) Disturbance-Mediated drift in tree functional groups in Amazonian forest fragments. Biotropica 39:691–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Laurance WF (2004) Forest–climate interactions in fragmented tropical landscapes. Phil Trans Ser B Biol Sci 359:345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oliveira M, Santos A, Tabarelli M (2008) Profound impoverishment of the large-tree stand in a hyper-fragmented landscape of the Atlantic forest. For Ecol Manag 256:1910–1917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Laurance WF, Nascimento HE, Laurance SG et al (2006) Rapid decay of tree-community composition in Amazonian forest fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:19010–19014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laurance WF, Nascimento HE, Laurance SG et al (2006) Rain forest fragmentation and the proliferation of successional trees. Ecology 87:469–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu H, Cao M, Hu H (2006) Geological history, flora, and vegetation of Xishuangbanna, Southern Yunnan, China. Biotropica 38:310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu H (2012) Biogeographical divergence of the flora of Yunnan, southwestern China initiated by the uplift of Himalaya and extrusion of Indochina block. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045601

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu JJ, Slik J (2014) Forest fragment spatial distribution matters for tropical tree conservation. Biol Conserv 171:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu X, Swenson NG, Zhang J et al (2013) The environment and space, not phylogeny, determine trait dispersion in a subtropical forest. Funct Ecol 27:264–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu J, Grumbine RE (2012) Landscape transformation through the use of ecological and socioeconomic indicators in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China, Mekong Region. Ecol Indic 36:749–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Poorter L, Wright SJ, Paz H et al (2008) Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five Neotropical forests. Ecology 89:1908–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Paz H, Mazer S, Martinez-Ramos M (2005) Comparative ecology of seed mass in Psychotria (Rubiaceae): within-and between-species effects of seed mass on early performance. Funct Ecol 19:707–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E et al (2013) New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 61:167–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Intern 11:36–42

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang J, Zhang G, Ci X et al (2013) Functional and phylogenetic assembly in a Chinese tropical tree community across size classes, spatial scales and habitats. Funct Ecol 28:520–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Doyle JJ (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dong W, Cheng T, Li C et al (2014) Discriminating plants using the DNA barcode rbcLb: an appraisal based on a large data set. Mol Ecol Resour 14:336–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Aiyar A (1999) The use of CLUSTAL W and CLUSTAL X for multiple sequence alignment, vol 132. Humana Press, New York, pp 221–241

    Google Scholar 

  41. Keane TM, Creevey CJ, Pentony MM et al (2006) Assessment of methods for amino acid matrix selection and their use on empirical data shows that ad hoc assumptions for choice of matrix are not justified. BMC Evol Biol 6:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N et al (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Corlett RT, Xing F, Ng SC et al (2000) Hong Kong vascular plants: distribution and status. Mem Hong Kong Nat Hist Soc 23:1–157

    Google Scholar 

  44. King D, Davies S, Supardi MN et al (2005) Tree growth is related to light interception and wood density in two mixed dipterocarp forests of Malaysia. Funct Ecol 19:445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tabarelli M, Aguiar AV, Girao LC et al (2010) Effects of pioneer tree species hyperabundance on forest fragments in northeastern Brazil. Conserv Biol 24:1654–1663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tyree MT (2003) Hydraulic limits on tree performance: transpiration, carbon gain and growth of trees. Trees 17:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zenglai X (2004) Numerical analysis of the Euphorbiaceae. J Trop Subtrop Bot 12:399–404

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ghazoul J, Sheil D (2010) Tropical rain forest ecology, diversity, and conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  49. Van Gelder H, Poorter L, Sterck F (2006) Wood mechanics, allometry, and life-history variation in a tropical rain forest tree community. New Phytol 171:367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kolb A, Diekmann M (2005) Effects of life-history traits on responses of plant species to forest fragmentation. Conserv Biol 19:929–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Terborgh J, Robinson SK, Parker TA III et al (1990) Structure and organization of an Amazonian forest bird community. Ecol Monogr 60:213–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the 1000 Talents Program (WQ20110491035). We are grateful to Hua Zhu, Guo-Da Tao, Jian-Wu Li, Jian-Tao Yin, Shi-Shun Zhou, Bin Wen and Qiang Liu for the assessment of the status of all angiosperms in Xishuangbanna. We thank Yu Song for his guidance with DNA extraction and phylogeny construction. We thank Kyle Tomlinson and Xiao Song for their advice with phylogeny analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla, 666303, Yunnan, China

    Meiling Zhao, Bo Pan, Yunhong Tan & Richard T. Corlett

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Meiling Zhao

Authors
  1. Meiling Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bo Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yunhong Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard T. Corlett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard T. Corlett.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 27 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, M., Pan, B., Tan, Y. et al. Winners and losers among tree species in Xishuangbanna: which traits are most important?. Sci. Bull. 60, 916–924 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0799-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0799-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation