Skip to main content
Log in

Benchmark solutions for MHD solver development

  • Article
  • Special Topic: Fluid Mechanics
  • Published:
Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A benchmark solution is of great importance in validating algorithms and codes for magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flows. Hunt and Shercliff’s solutions are usually employed as benchmarks for MHD flows in a duct with insulated walls or with thin conductive walls, in which wall effects on MHD are represented by the wall conductance ratio. With wall thickness resolved, it is stressed that the solution of Sloan and Smith’s and the solution of Butler’s can be used to check the error of the thin wall approximation condition used for Hunt’s solutions. It is noted that Tao and Ni’s solutions can be used as a benchmark for MHD flows in a duct with wall symmetrical or unsymmetrical, thick or thin. When the walls are symmetrical, Tao and Ni’s solutions are reduced to Sloan and Smith’s solution and Butler’s solution, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdou A, Sze D, Wong C, et al. U.S. plans and strategy for ITER blanket testing. Fusion Sci Technol, 2005, 47: 475–487

    Google Scholar 

  2. Molokov S, Moreau R, Moffatt H K. Magnetohydrodynamics—Historical Evolution and Trends. New York: Springer, 2007

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kulikovskii A G. Slow steady flows of a conducting fluid at large Hartmann numbers. Fluid Dyn, 1968, 3: 1–5

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Molokov S, Bühler L. Liquid metal flow in a U-bend in a strong uniform magnetic field. J Fluid Mech, 1994, 267: 325–352

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Reed C B, Piclolglou B F, Hua T Q, et al. ALEX results—a comparison of measurements from a round and a rectangular duct with 3-D code predictions. In: the 12th Symposium on Fusion Engineering, Monkey, CA, October, 1987

  6. Bühler L, Horanyi S. Experimental investigations of MHD flows in a sudden expansion. FZKA 7245, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, 2006

  7. Ni M J, Li J F. A consistent and conservative scheme for incompressible MHD flows at low magnetic Reynolds number. Part III: On a staggered mesh. J Comput Phys, 2011, 231: 281–298

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schercliff J A. Steady motion of conducting fluids in pipes under transverse magnetic fields. Proc Cambe Philos Soc, 1953, 49: 126–144

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Uflyand Y S. Flow stability of a conducting fluid in a rectangular channel in a transverse magnetic field. Soviet Phys Tech Phys, 1961, 5: 1194–1196

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang C C, Lundgren T S. Duct flow in magnetohydrodynamics. Z Angew Math Phys, 1961, 12: 100–114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunt J C R. 1965 magnetohydrodynamic flow in rectangular ducts. J Fluid Mech, 1965, 21: 577–590

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Sloan D M, Smith P. Magnetohydrodynamic flow in a rectangular pipe between conducting plates. Z Angew Math Mech, 1966, 46: 439–443

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Tao Z, Ni M J. Exact solutions for MHD flows in a rectangular duct with unsymmetrical Hartmann walls. Submitted for review

  14. Butler G F. A note on magnetohydrodynamic duct flow. Proc Camb Philos Soc, 1969, 66: 66–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tao Z, Ni M J. Return to Hunt’s case I of MHD flows in a rectangular duct with unsymmetrical walls. Submitted for review

  16. Jaworski M A, Gray T K, Antonelli M, et al. Thermoelectric magnetohydrodynamic stirring of liquid metals. Phys Rev Lett, 2010, 104: 094503

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Davidson P A. An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Ni M J, Munipalli R, Morley N B, et al. A current density conservative scheme for incompressible MHD flows at a low magnetic Reynolds number. Part I: On a rectangular collocated mesh. J Comput Phys, 2007, 227: 187–204

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ni M J, Munipalli R, Huang P, et al. A current density conservative scheme for incompressible MHD flows at a low magnetic Reynolds number. Part II: On an arbitrary collocated mesh. J Comput Phys, 2007, 227: 205–228

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to MingJiu Ni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tao, Z., Ni, M. Benchmark solutions for MHD solver development. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 56, 378–382 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-013-4997-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-013-4997-5

Keywords

Navigation