Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Discovery of the ancient Ordovician oil-bearing karst cave in Liuhuanggou, North Tarim Basin, and its significance

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A typical ancient karst cave is found in the Yijianfang Formation of Ordovician at Liuhuanggou, North Tarim Basin. With an entrance of 4.8 m wide and 20 m high, the Liuhuanggou ancient karst cave extends to NW 315° and has been filled by sediments, which can be classified into three types according to their nature and origin: clastic sediments (gravels), chemical sediments (palaeotravertine), and mixed sediments. Among them, the Paleotravertine and gravels are most common. The palaeotravertine is laminated type and yellowish brown or black in color due to oil inside. When saturated with oil, the palaeotravertine is black. Under microscope, oil mainly accumulates in the cracks between calcite crystals. The filling period of the Liuhuanggou karst cave can be divided into three stages: mixed filling, chemical filling, and clastic (palaeotravertine breccia) filling. Numerous fractures are distributed on one side of the karst cave. The fractures can be as wide as 40 cm and over 40 m long. Fractures of different periods and sizes constitute a fracture network and are all filled with calcite veins. Oil can be found inside the fractures. In the chemical fillings, sulfur is also found, which can indicate the magma influence on karst caves. The existence of sulfur also confirms that the Liuhunggou karst cave was formed in ancient times rather than recently or nowadays. Different from normal sedimentary limestone, the ancient Liuhuanggou karst cave has a distinct isotope fractionation and the depletion of heavy carbon and oxygen isotope. Controlled by the northwest oriented vertical strike-slip shear fault, the karst cave is actually a dissolved vertical fault belt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keith M H, Weber J N. Isotopic composition and environmental classification of selected limestones and fossils. Geochem Cosmochim Acta, 1964, 28: 259–260

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peng S P, He H, Shao L Y, et al. Carbon Iiotopic compositions of the Cambrian-Ordovician carbonates in Tarim Basin (in Chinese). J China Univ Mining Tech, 2002, 31: 353–357

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shao L Y. Relationship between carbonatite carbon and oxygen isotope and palaeotemperature (in Chinese). J China Univ Mining Tech, 1994, 23: 39–45

    Google Scholar 

  4. Craig H. Standard for reporting concentrations of deuterium and oxygen-18 in natural water. Science, 1961, 133: 1702–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein S, Buchsbaum R, Lowenstam H, et al. Revised carbonatewater isotopic temperature scale. Bull Geol Soc Am, 1953, 64: 1315–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Neil J R. Oxygen isotope geothermometry. J Chem Phys Acta, 1969, 30: 5547–5558

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deines P. Stable isotope variations in carbonatites. In: Bell K, ed. Carbonatites: Genesis and Evolution. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989. 301–359

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Z R, Zhi X C, Zhou D C, et al. A preliminary study of the relationship between palaeotemperature of isotope and sea-level changes (in Chinese). J Stratig, 1997, 21: 289–292

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hong A S, Peng Z C, Li P. Isotopic geochemistry methods for paleotemperature studies of cave speleothems (in Chinese). Adv Earth Sci, 1995, 10: 348–352

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu R L, Fu H, Tectogenesis’ influence on Ordovician carbonate reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield (in Chinese). Nat Gas Expl Dev, 2006, 29: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huang B C, Zhu R X, Otofuji Y, et al. Discussion on the Caledon paleogeographic location of Main Land-mass in China. Chin Sci Bull, 2000, 45: 337–345

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao B, Zhao J S, Wang J C, et al. A new type of carbonatite: Carbonatite of crust origin (in Chinese). Geochemica, 2004, 33: 649–660

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nogueira A C R, Riccomini C, Sial A N, et al. Carbon and strontium isotope fluctuations and palaeoceanographic changes in the late Neoproterozic Araras carbonate platform, southern Amazon craton, Brazil. Chem Geol, 2007, 237: 168–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eickhoff K H, Von Der Borch C C, Grady A E, et al. Proterozoic canyons of the Flinders Ranges (South Australia): Submarine canyons or drowned river valleys? Sediment Geol, 1988, 58: 217–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Calver C R. Isotope stratigraphy of the Ediacarian (Neoproterozoic III) of the Adelaide Rift Complex, Australia, and the overprint of water column stratification. Precambrian Res, 2000, 100: 121–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giddings J A, Wallace M W, Haines P W, et al. Submarine origin for the Neoproterozoic Wonoka canyons, south Australia. Sediment Geol, 2010, 223: 35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Geoscience and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, 266580, China

    JianHua Zhong, Cui Mao, ZhiJuan Huang, ZhuFu Shao, Jia Li & DanFeng Zhang

  2. Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China

    JianHua Zhong & Yong Li

  3. Oilfield Department, Sinopec Group, Beijing, 100825, China

    Yang Li

  4. Institute of Exploration and Development, Sinopec Group, Beijing, 100083, China

    XiangChun Yuan

  5. Institute of Resources and Environment College, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454000, China

    YongBin Niu

  6. BGP Geophysical Research Institute, CNPC, Zhuozhou, 072751, China

    Xin Chen

  7. Institute of Tarim Oilfield, CNPC, Korla, 841000, China

    PeiJun Wang

  8. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Yong Li

Authors
  1. JianHua Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cui Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. XiangChun Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. YongBin Niu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. ZhiJuan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. ZhuFu Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. PeiJun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jia Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. DanFeng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JianHua Zhong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhong, J., Mao, C., Li, Y. et al. Discovery of the ancient Ordovician oil-bearing karst cave in Liuhuanggou, North Tarim Basin, and its significance. Sci. China Earth Sci. 55, 1406–1426 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-012-4467-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-012-4467-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation