Skip to main content
Log in

1-Bit compressive sensing: Reformulation and RRSP-based sign recovery theory

  • Articles
  • Published:
Science China Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, the 1-bit compressive sensing (1-bit CS) has been studied in the field of sparse signal recovery. Since the amplitude information of sparse signals in 1-bit CS is not available, it is often the support or the sign of a signal that can be exactly recovered with a decoding method. We first show that a necessary assumption (that has been overlooked in the literature) should be made for some existing theories and discussions for 1-bit CS. Without such an assumption, the found solution by some existing decoding algorithms might be inconsistent with 1-bit measurements. This motivates us to pursue a new direction to develop uniform and nonuniform recovery theories for 1-bit CS with a new decoding method which always generates a solution consistent with 1-bit measurements. We focus on an extreme case of 1-bit CS, in which the measurements capture only the sign of the product of a sensing matrix and a signal. We show that the 1-bit CS model can be reformulated equivalently as an 0-minimization problem with linear constraints. This reformulation naturally leads to a new linear-program-based decoding method, referred to as the 1-bit basis pursuit, which is remarkably different from existing formulations. It turns out that the uniqueness condition for the solution of the 1-bit basis pursuit yields the so-called restricted range space property (RRSP) of the transposed sensing matrix. This concept provides a basis to develop sign recovery conditions for sparse signals through 1-bit measurements. We prove that if the sign of a sparse signal can be exactly recovered from 1-bit measurements with 1-bit basis pursuit, then the sensing matrix must admit a certain RRSP, and that if the sensing matrix admits a slightly enhanced RRSP, then the sign of a k-sparse signal can be exactly recovered with 1-bit basis pursuit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ai A, Lapanowski A, Plan Y, et al. One-bit compressed sensing with non-gaussian measurements. Linear Algebra Appl, 2014, 441: 222–239

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bahmani S, Boufounos P T, Raj B. Robust 1-bit compressive sensing via gradient support pursuit. TR2013-029, Mitsubishi Electric Research Lab, April 2013

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bandeira A, Dobriban E, Mixon D, et al. Certifying the restricted isometry property is hard. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2013, 59: 3448–3450

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Boufounos P. Greedy sparse signal reconstruction from sign measurements. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems And Computers. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2009, 1305–1309

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boufounos P. Reconstruction of sparse signals from distorted randomized measurements. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. New York: IEEE, 2010, 3998–4001

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Boufounos P, Baraniuk R. 1-Bit compressive sensing. In: Conference on Information Sciences Systems. New York: IEEE, 2008, 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bourquard A, Aguet F, Unser M. Optical imaging using binary sensors. Opt Express, 2010, 18: 4876–4888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bourquard A, Unser M. Binary compressed imaging. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2013, 22: 1042–1055

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruckstein A, Elad M, Donoho D. From sparse solutions of systems of equations to sparse modeling of signals and images. SIAM Rev, 2009, 51: 34–81

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Candès E, Romberg J, Tao T. Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Comm Pure Appl Math, 2006, 59: 1207–1223

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Candès E, Tao T. Decoding by linear programming. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2005, 51: 4203–4215

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Candès E, Romberg J, Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2006, 52: 489–509

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Candès E, Wakin M, Boyd S. Enhancing sparsity by reweighted 1 minimization. J Fourier Anal Appl, 2008, 14: 877–905

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen A, Dahmen W, Devore R. Compressive sensing and best k-term approximation. J Amer Math Soc, 2009, 22: 211–231

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Dantzig G. Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Davenport M, Plan Y, Berg E van den, et al. 1-Bit matrix completion. Inform Inference, 2014, 3: 189–223

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Donoho D. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2006, 52: 1289–1306

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Donoho D, Elad M. Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via 1 minimization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 2197–2202

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Foucart S, Rauhut H. A Mathematical Introduction to Compressive Sensing. New York: Springer, 2013

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Fuchs J. On sparse representations in arbitrary redundant bases. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2004, 50: 1341–1344

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Goldman A J, Tucker A W. Theory of linear programming. In: Linear Inequalities and Related Systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1956, 53–97

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gopi S, Netrapalli P, Jain P, et al. One-bit compressed sensing: Provable support and vector recovery. J Mach Learn Res, 2013, 3: 154–162

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta A, Nowak A, Recht B. Sample complexity for 1-bit compressed sensing and sparse classification. In: 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory. New York: IEEE, 2010, 1553–1557

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacques L, Laska J, Boufounos P, et al. Robust 1-bit compressive sensing via binary stable embeddings of sparse vectors. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2013, 59: 2082–2102

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Kamilov U, Bourquard A, Amini A, et al. One-bit measurements with adaptive thresholds. IEEE Signal Process Lett, 2012, 19: 607–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laska J. Regime change: Sampling rate vs bit-depth in compressive sensing. PhD thesis. Houston: Rice University, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  27. Laska J, Baraniuk R. Regime change: Bit-depth versus measurement-rate in compressive sensing. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2012, 60: 3496–3505

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Laska J, Wen Z, Yin W, et al. Trust, but verify: Fast and accurate signal recovery from 1-bit compressive measurements. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2011, 59: 5289–5301

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Le B, Rondeau T, Reed J, et al. Analog-to-digital converters. IEEE Signal Process Mag, 2005, 22: 69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Movahed A, Panahi A, Durisi G. A robust RFPI-based 1-bit compressive sensing reconstruction algorithm. In: Information Theory Workshop. New York: IEEE, 2012, 567–571

    Google Scholar 

  31. Plan Y, Vershynin R. One-bit compressed sensing by linear programming. Comm Pure Appl Math, 2013, 66: 1275–1297

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Plan Y, Vershynin R. Robust 1-bit compressed sensing and sparse logistic regression: A convex programming approach. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2013, 59: 482–494

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Plumbley M. On polar polytopes and the recovery of sparse representations. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2007, 53: 3188–3195

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Shen L, Suter B. Blind one-bit compressive sampling. ArXiv:1302.1419, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sun J, Goyal V. Quantization for compressed sensing reconstruction. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00452256/, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tillmann A, Pfetsch M. The computational complexity of the restricted isometry property, the nullspace property, and related concepts in compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2014, 60: 1248–1259

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Tropp J. Greed is good: Algorithmic results for sparse approximation. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2004, 50: 2231–2242

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Walden R. Analog-to-digital converter survey and analysis. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 199, 17: 539–550

  39. Yan M, Yang Y, Osher S. Robust 1-bit compressive sensing using adaptive outlier pursuit. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2012, 60: 3868–3875

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang Y. Theory of compressive sensing via 1-minimization: A non-RIP analysis and extensions. J Oper Res Soc China, 2013, 1: 79–105

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao Y B. RSP-based analysis for sparsest and least 1-norm solutions to underdetermined linear systems. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2013, 61: 5777–5788

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhao Y B. Equivalence and strong equivalence between the sparsest and least 1-norm nonnegative solutions of linear systems and their applications. J Oper Res Soc China, 2014, 2: 171–193

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao Y B, Kočvara M. A new computational method for the sparsest solution to systems of linear equations. SIAM J Optim, 2015, 25: 1110–1134

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhao Y B, Li D. Reweighted 1-minimization for sparse solutions to underdetermined linear systems. SIAM J Optim, 2012, 22: 1065–1088

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YunBin Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Xu, C. 1-Bit compressive sensing: Reformulation and RRSP-based sign recovery theory. Sci. China Math. 59, 2049–2074 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-016-5153-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-016-5153-2

Keywords

MSC(2010)

Navigation