Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving technology literacy: does it open doors to traditional content?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated whether an identifiable link existed between gains in technology literacy and achievement in the areas of reading, mathematics, and language arts. Normal curve equivalent (NCE) content score changes from TerraNova assessments were calculated for approximately 5,000 students from fourth- to fifth-grade and 5,000 students from seventh- to eighth-grade. These changes were compared to relative gains from a pre- to post-assessment in technology literacy. The rationale that a correlation might be expected is grounded in two ideas: (1) technology literacy gains lead to heightened subject specific confidence, and (2) technology literacy gains reflect improved ability to use technology as a mediator of new learning. If correct, both of these conjectures would predict increased academic achievement among students experiencing gains in technology literacy. Results provided evidence of such connections between technology literacy gains and language arts skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderman, E. M., Anderman, L. H., & Griesinger, T. (1999). The relation of present and possible academic selves during early adolescence to grade point average and achievement goals. The Elementary School Journal, 100(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J. (2000). Who’s wired and who’s not: Children’s access to and use of computer technology. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 44–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1959). Landmarks of tomorrow. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huong, L. (2003). The mediational role of language teachers in sociocultural theory. English Teaching Forum, 41(3), 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2007). National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Students. http://www.iste.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=NETS. Accessed 7 May 2009.

  • Karpov, Y. V., & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky’s concept of mediation. American Psychologist, 53(1), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky’s psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamnson, R. N. (2001). Does technology present a new way of learning? Educational Technology & Society, 4(1), 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patelis, T., Sireci, S., & Wiley, A. (2006a). Item response theory calibration report for the Elementary School TechLiteracy AssessmentTM. Portland, OR: Sireci Psychometric Services, Inc. Unpublished report (SPS Reference No. LDC06-004).

  • Patelis, T., Sireci, S., & Wiley, A. (2006b). Item response theory calibration report for the Middle School TechLiteracy AssessmentTM. Portland, OR: Sireci Psychometric Services, Inc. Unpublished report (SPS Reference No. LDC06-005).

  • Peck, C., Cuban, L., & Kirkpatrick, H. (2002). Techno-promoter dreams, student realities. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(6), 472–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2006). Listen to the natives. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1990). Cognitive effects with and of computer technology. Communication Research, 17(1), 26–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, J. (1995). The impact of educational technology on student achievement. The Milken Exchange on Educational Technology. http://www.mff.org/publications/publications.taf?page=161. Accessed May 7, 2009.

  • Sireci, S., Wiley, A., & Patelis, T. (2006). Setting standards on the elementary school and middle school TechLiteracy AssessmentTM. Portland, OR: Sireci Psychometric Services, Inc. Unpublished report (SPS Reference No. LDC06-006).

  • TechLiteracy Assessment frequently asked questions (2006). http://www.learning.com/tla/faq.htm#What-is-TLA. Accessed May 7, 2009.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2006). Literacy and technology: Bridging the divide. In D. Gibbs & K. L. Krause (Eds.), Cyberlines 2.0: Languages and cultures of the Internet (pp. 163–174). Albert Park, Australia: James Nicholas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: ETS Policy Information Center. ftp://ftp.ets.org/pub/res/technolog.pdf. Accessed May 7 2009.

  • Wenglinsky, H. (2006). Technology and achievement: The bottom line. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. M., & Trainin, G. (2007). First-grade students’ motivation and achievement for reading, writing, and spelling. Reading Psychology, 28(3), 257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugene Judson.

Appendix

Appendix

Subcategory

TLA-EL examples

TLA-MS examples

Systems and Fundamentals: assesses tasks central to the understanding and use of computer systems

Knowledge of the parts of the computer

Storing and retrieving files on computers or networks

Basic technology vocabulary

Creating, storing and retrieving data on local area networks and peripheral devices

Basic troubleshooting for computer problems

Recognizing and distinguishing among file types

Social and Ethical: assesses knowledge about accepted ethical norms as they relate to technology, as well as the impact of technology, past and present, on society

Identifying ethical and unethical uses of technology tools

Awareness of the social and ethical concepts associated with network and telecommunications use

Understanding the basics of online safety

Identifying ethical and unethical behaviors with respect to the use and transmission of electronic files, software and other online data

Awareness of major social issues and ongoing effects and controversies regarding prominent technology advances

Word Processing: assesses tasks central to formatting text and text/page layout

Publishing and saving documents such as letters and short papers

Formatting text

Publishing, printing and saving documents in a variety of locations

Applying standard text formatting and layout options

Applying layout options at the paragraph, page and document level

Spreadsheets: assesses tasks central to creating, editing, manipulating, and interpreting data in spreadsheets, charts, and graphs

Creating worksheets

Entering and saving information

Creating and interpreting basic graphs

Formatting cells

Creating, entering, sorting, filtering and saving information

Writing simple formulas

Creating, labeling and interpreting more complex graphs

Multimedia and Presentations: assesses tasks central to the creation and manipulation of graphic, audio, and video by electronic means

Creating and editing multimedia projects

Communicating effectively to a variety of audiences using multimedia

Using video recorders to capture images and edit clips for use in video or other multimedia

Inserting graphics and other multimedia into documents

Creating, formatting and saving presentations

Capturing and composing audio-visual presentations

Telecommunications and Internet: assesses tasks central to telecommunications and internet software

Recognizing and comparing basic methods of online communication

Navigating from one web site to another

Accessing and sending e-mail

Navigating from one web site to another

Assessing content purpose and credibility as grade appropriate

Database: assesses tasks central to the use of common database interfaces, such as Web search engines and library records

Using web library search engines

Searching using single and multiple keyword searches

Searching the web or other databases using both single and multiple keyword searches

Sort, filter and search simple databases

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Judson, E. Improving technology literacy: does it open doors to traditional content?. Education Tech Research Dev 58, 271–284 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9135-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9135-8

Keywords

Navigation