Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Possible Legal Barriers for PCP Access to Mental Health Treatment Records

  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Provider and payer groups have endorsed the goal of improving the integration of primary care and behavioral health across a variety of programs and settings. There is an interest in sharing patients’ medical information, a goal that is permissible within HIPAA, but there are concerns about more restrictive state medical privacy laws. This article assesses whether a substantial number of state medical privacy laws are, or could be interpreted to be, more restrictive than HIPAA. Preliminary investigation found that in almost one third of the states (including large-population states such as Florida, Georgia, Massachusetts, New York, and Texas), primary care physicians (PCPs) may have difficulty accessing mental health treatment records without the patient’s (or his/her guardian/conservator’s) written consent. If a comprehensive legal analysis supports this conclusion, then those advocating integration of behavioral and primary care may need to consider seeking appropriate state legislative solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Community Mental Health Centers Act, Pub L No. 88–164, tit 2, 77 Stat 290, 1963.

  2. Druss BG. The mental health/primary care interface in the United States: history, structure, and context. General Hospital Psychiatry 2002; 24(4): 197–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mauksch LB, Leahy D. Collaboration between primary care medicine and mental health in an HMO. Family Systems Medicine 1993; 11(2): 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pomerantz AS, Corson JA, Detzer MJ. The challenge of integrated care for mental health: leaving the 50 minute hour and other sacred things. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 2009; 16(1): 40–46.

  5. Kessler R. The difficulty of making psychology research and clinical practice relevant to medicine: experiences and observations. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 2008; 15(1): 65–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Institute of Medicine Committee on Crossing the Quality Chasm: Adaptation to Mental Health and Addictive Disorders. Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Croft B, Parish SL. Care integration in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Implications for behavioral health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2013; 40(4): 258–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub L No. 111–148, 124 Stat 119, 2010.

  10. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Report to Congress on the nation's substance abuse and mental health workforce issue. January 24, 2013. Available online at http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/PEP13-RTC-BHWORK/PEP13-RTC-BHWORK.pdf. Accessed June 15, 2013.

  11. National Council for Behavioral Health. Summary of the major provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act, updated 10/22/10. Available online at http://www.thenationalcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/HCR-Summary-Chart-Updated-with-Approps-Info-10-22-10.pdf. Accessed June 15, 2013.

  12. Barry CL, Huskamp HA. Moving beyond parity: Mental health and addiction care under the ACA. New England Journal of Medicine 2011; 365(11): 973–975.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Pritts J, Choy A, Emmart L, et al. (eds). The State of Health Privacy, Second Edition. Washington: Georgetown University, 2002. Available online at https://www.cdt.org/files/pdfs/The%20State%20of%20Health%20Privacy%20(Volume%201).pdf, and https://cdt.org/files/pdfs/The%20State%20of%20Health%20Privacy%20(Volume%202).pdf. Accessed June 15, 2013.

  14. Wetherell JL, Kaplan RM, Kallenberg G, et al. Mental health treatment preferences of older and younger primary care patients. International journal of psychiatry in medicine 2004; 34(3): 219–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oyama O, Burg MA, Fraser K, et al. Mental Health Treatment by Family Physicians: Current Practices and Preferences. Family Medicine 2012; 44(10): 704–711.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The technical assistance of Patricia Smith is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflict of Interest

No authors have a conflict of interest to report, financial or otherwise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie S. Rothenberg JD, MA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rothenberg, L.S., Ganz, D.A. & Wenger, N.S. Possible Legal Barriers for PCP Access to Mental Health Treatment Records. J Behav Health Serv Res 43, 319–329 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-015-9458-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-015-9458-7

Keywords

Navigation