Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Wraparound Team Composition, Youth Self-determination, and Youth Satisfaction in Transition Services

  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wraparound, a team-based planning process for youth and families, has been widely adopted in school-based services for older adolescents and emerging adults with serious mental health conditions transitioning to adulthood. Reservations have been voiced, however, regarding possible drawbacks of teams for these youth, including concerns about difficulties with involving supportive adults, and whether youth might perceive team-based planning as a threat to their developing autonomy. To date, however, no studies have examined the feasibility of involving supports in teams and relationships between team composition and youth’s service experiences. The present study examined the relationships between team composition and youth’s perceptions of self-determination and service satisfaction among 36 youths in seven school-based programs using a specialized form of wraparound for transition services. Findings showed that meeting participation by caregivers and professionals from both inside and outside of schools was common and that regular participation by combinations of these types of adults was related to youth self-determination and satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruns E, Sather A, Pullmann M, et al. National trends in implementing wraparound: Results from the state wraparound survey. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2011; 20:726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark HB. Transition to Independence Process: TIP system development and operations manual. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheney D, Hagner D, Malloy J, et al. Transition services for youth and young adults with emotional disturbance: Description and initial results of Project RENEW. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals 1998; 21: 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cavanaugh D, Goldman S, Friesen B, et al. Designing a recovery-oriented care model for adolescents and transition-age youth with substance use or co-occurring mental health disorders. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration. Rockville, MD: USDHHS, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Walker JS, Pullmann MD, Moser CL, et al. Does team-based planning “work” for adolescents? Findings from studies of wraparound. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 2012; 35: 189–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haber MG, Cook JR, Kilmer RP. Perceptions of wraparound processes by youth versus other team members: Associations with age and implications for implementation with transition-age youth. American Journal of Community Psychology 2012; 49: 454–466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark HB, Hart K. Understanding and addressing the needs of transition-age youth and young adults and their families. In: HB Clark, DK Unruh (Eds). Transition of Youth & Young Adults with Emotional or Behavioral Difficulties: An Evidence-supported Handbook. Baltimore, MD: Brookes, 2009, pp. 47–113.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis M, Koroloff N. The great divide: How mental health policy fails young adults. Research in Community and Mental Health 2006; 14: 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haber MG, LaPorte T, Knight NM. Emerging models of transition services for youth with emotional and behavioral difficulties. In: TP Guilotta, GR Adams (Eds). Handbook of Adolescent Behavior Problems, Third Edition. New York, NY: Springer Academic Publishing, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  10. Soanes C, Timmons S. Improving transition: A qualitative study examining the attitudes of young people with chronic illness transferring to adult care. Journal of Child Health Care 2004; 8: 102–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis M, Green M, Hoffman, C. The service system obstacle course for transition-age youth and young adults. In: HB Clark, DK Unruh (Eds). Transition of Youth & Young Adults with Emotional or Behavioral Difficulties. Baltimore, MD: Brookes, 2009, pp. 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davis M, Koroloff N, Johnsen M. Social network analysis of child and adult interorganizational connections. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 2012; 35: 265–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rusch F, Hughes C, Agran M, et al. Toward self-directed learning, post-high school placement, and coordinated support: Constructing new transition bridges to adult life. Career Development For Exceptional Individuals 2009; 32: 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gestsdóttir S, Lerner RM. Intentional self-regulation and positive youth development in early adolescence: Findings from the 4-h study of positive youth development. Developmental Psychology 2007; 43: 508–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tebes JK, Feinn R, Vanderploeg JJ, et al. Impact of a positive youth development program in urban after-school settings on the prevention of adolescent substance use. Journal of Adolescent Health 2007; 41: 239–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoeni R, Ross K. Material assistance from families during the transition to adulthood. On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peterson GW, Bush KR, Supple A. Predicting adolescent autonomy from parents: Relationship connectedness and restrictiveness. Sociological Inquiry 1999; 69: 431–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carter E, Lane K, Pierson M. Self determination skills and opportunities of transition-age youth with emotional disturbance and learning disabilities. Exceptional Children 2006; 72: 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chirkov V, Ryan RM, Kim Y, et al. Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003; 84: 97–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis M, Koyanagi C. Summary of Center for Mental Health Services youth transition policy meeting: National experts panel. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Manteuffel B, Stephens RL, Sondheimer DL, et al. Characteristics, service experiences, and outcomes of transition-aged youth in systems of care: Programmatic and policy implications. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 2008; 35: 469–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cook RJ. Are we helping foster care youth prepare for their future? Children and Youth Services Review 1994; 16: 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Effland VS, Walton BA, McIntyre JS. Connecting the dots: Stages of implementation, wraparound fidelity and youth outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Services 2011; 20: 736–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marmorstein N, Iacono W. Major depression and conduct disorder in youth: Associations with parental psychopathology and parent–child conflict. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2004; 45: 377–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Davis M. Addressing the needs of youth in transition to adulthood. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 2003; 30: 495–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tanner J. Recentering during emerging adulthood: A critical turning point in lifespan human development. In: J Arnett, J Tanner (Eds). Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2006, pp. 21–55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Jivanjee P, Kruzich P, Gordon LJ. Community integration of transition-age individuals: Views of young with mental health disorders. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 2008; 35: 402–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brener ND, Billy JO, Grady WR. Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: Evidence from the scientific literature. Journal of Adolescent Health 2003; 33: 436–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Smetana JG, Metzger A, Gettman DC. Disclosure and secrecy in adolescent–parent relationships. Child Development 2006; 77: 201–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Keijsers L, Branje SJ, VanderValk IE. Reciprocal effects between parental solicitation, parental control, adolescent disclosure, and adolescent delinquency. Journal of Research on Adolescence 2010; 20: 88–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hawley K, Weisz J. Child, parent and therapist (dis)agreement on target problems in outpatient therapy: The therapist’s dilemma and its implications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2003; 71: 62–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pottick KJ, Bilder S, Stoep A, et al. US patterns of mental health service utilization for transition-age youth and young adults. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 2008; 35: 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bruns EJ, Walker JS, Bernstein A, et al. Family voice with informed choice: Coordinating wraparound with research-based treatment for children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 2014 4: 256–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bruns EJ, Burchard JD, Suter JC, et al. Assessing fidelity to a community-based treatment for youth: The Wraparound Fidelity Index. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 2004; 12: 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wagner M, Davis M. How are we preparing students with emotional disturbances for the transition to young adulthood? Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study—2. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 2006; 14: 86–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Malloy J, Drake J, Abate K, Cormier, G. The RENEW model of futures planning, resource developments, and school-to-career experiences for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders. In: D Cheney (Ed). Transition of Secondary Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders, Second Edition. Champaign, IL: Research Press, 2010, pp. 267–304.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Malloy JM, Drake J, Cloutier H, et al. RENEW facilitator’s manual: a secondary transition model for youth and young adults. Durham, NH: Institute on Disability, University of New Hampshire, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Haber MG, Burgess C. A multi-site evaluation of RENEW model implementation in North Carolina. Paper presented at: The 24th Annual Children’s Mental Health Research and Policy Conference; March, 2011; Tampa, FL.

  39. Bruns EJ, Walker JS, Adams J, et al. Ten principles of the wraparound process. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children’s Mental Health, Portland State University, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Walker JS, Gowen LK. Community-based approaches for supporting positive development in youth and young adults with serious mental health conditions. Portland, OR: Research and Training Center for Pathways to Positive Futures, Portland State University, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Huey S, Henggeler S, Brondino M, et al. Mechanisms of change in multisystemic therapy: Reducing delinquent behavior through therapist adherence and improved family and peer functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000; 68: 451–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Waxman RP, Weist MD, Benson DM. Toward collaboration in the growing education–mental health interface. Clinical Psychology Review 1999; 19: 239–253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Patrikakou E, Weissberg R. School-family partnerships to enhance children’s social, emotional and academic learning. In: R Bar-on, J Maree, M Elias (Eds). Educating People to be Emotionally Intelligent. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007, pp. 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, Fifth Edition. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Epstein MH, Nordness PD, Kutash K, et al. Assessing the fidelity of wraparound during family planning meetings. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 2003; 30: 352–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Spencer R. Naturally occurring mentoring relationships involving youth. The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach [e-book]. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2007, pp. 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fan W, Williams C. The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology 2010; 30: 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chambers C, Wehmeyer M, Saito Y, et al. Self-determination: What do we know? Where do we go? Exceptionality 2007; 15: 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Goodland JI. A Place Called School: Prospects for the Future. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kenny D, Kashy D, Cook W. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Singer J, Willett J. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change And Event Occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. Haber MG, Malloy JM, Burgin EC, et al. RENEW in New Hampshire and North Carolina: Advancements in a promising model for improving transition outcomes of youth. Paper presented at: 24th Annual Children’s Mental Health Research and Policy Conference; March, 2011; Tampa, FL.

  53. Hagner D, Malloy J, Mazzone M, et al. Youth with disabilities in the criminal justice system: Considerations for transition and rehabilitation planning. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 2008; 16: 240–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Arnett J. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist 2000; 55:469–480.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Walton B, Kim H-W, Clark HB, et al. Using communimetric tools with transition-age youth and young adults. Paper presented at: 9th Annual Children’s Assessment of Strengths and Needs Conference; October, 2013; San Francisco, CA.

  56. Davis M, Koroloff N, Ellison M. Between adolescence and adulthood: Rehabilitation research to improve services for youth and young adults. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 2012; 35: 167–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial interest related to the outcome of this research and have no potential conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas M. LaPorte MA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

LaPorte, T.M., Haber, M.G. & Malloy, J.M. Wraparound Team Composition, Youth Self-determination, and Youth Satisfaction in Transition Services. J Behav Health Serv Res 43, 611–629 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-014-9434-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-014-9434-7

Keywords

Navigation