Skip to main content
Log in

Organizations undertaking complex projects in uncertain environments

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that firms’ environments are becoming more complex and uncertain. This paper investigates the relationship between the complexity of a firm’s activities, environmental uncertainty and organizational structure. We assume agents are arranged hierarchically, but decisions can be made at different levels. We model a firm’s activity set as a modified NK landscape. Via simulations, we find that centralized decision making generates a higher payoff in more complex and uncertain environments, and that a flatter structure is better for the organization with centralized decision making, provided the cost of information processing is low enough.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auerswald P, Kauffman S, Lobo J and Shell K (2000). The production recipes approach to modeling technological innovation: an application to learning by doing. J Econ Dyn Control 24: 389–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barr J and Saraceno F (2002). A computational theory of the firm. J Econ Behav Organ 49: 345–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bethel JE and Liebeskind J (1993). The effects of ownership structure on corporate restructuring. Strategic Manage J 14: 15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang MH and Harrington JE (2000). Centralization versus decentralization in a multi-unit organization: a computational model of a retail chain as a multi-agent adaptive system. Manage Sci 46: 1427–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang MH, Harrington JE (2001) Organization of innovation in a multi-unit firm: coordinating adaptive search on multiple rugged landscapes. Tech. rep., working paper 442. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore

  6. Chang MH and Harrington JE (2003). Multimarket competition, consumer search and the organizational structure of multiunit firms. Manage Sci 49: 541–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chuma H (2006). Increasing complexity and limits of organization in the microlithography industry: implications for Japanese science-based industries. Res Policy 35: 393–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. David PA (1985). Clio and the economics of qwerty. Am Econ Rev 75: 332–337

    Google Scholar 

  9. Disney R, Haskel J and Heden Y (2003). Restructuring and productivity growth in uk manufacturing. Econ J 113: 666–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gavetti G and Levinthal D (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: cognitive and experimental search. Adm Sci Quart 45: 113–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kauffman S (1993). The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kauffman S, Lobo J and Macready WG (2000). Optimal search on a technology landscape. J Econ Behav Organ 43: 141–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Langlois RN (2002). Modularity in technology and organization. J Econ Behav Organ 49: 19–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawrence P and Lorsch J (1986). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, revised edition. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levinthal D (2000) Organizational capabilities in complex worlds. In: Nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 363–376

  16. Levinthal D and Warglien M (1999). Landscape design: designing for local action in complex worlds. Organ Sci 10: 342–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Radner R (1992). Hierarchy: the economics of managing. J Econ Literat 30: 1382–1415

    Google Scholar 

  18. Radner R (1993). The organization of decentralized information processing. Econometrica 61: 1109–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rajan RG and Wulf J (2006). The flattening firm: evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies. Rev Econ Stat 88: 759–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rivkin JW and Siggelkow N (2003). Balancing search and stability: interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Manage Sci 49: 290–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruef M (1997). Assessing organizational fitness on a dynamic landscape: an empirical test of the relative inertia thesis. Strateg Manage J 18: 837–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Siggelkow N and Rivkin JW (2005). Speed and search: designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ Sci 16: 101–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Siggelkow N and Rivkin JW (2006). When exploration backfires: unintended consequences of multi-level organizational search. Acad Manage J 49: 779–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Simon HA (1981). The sciences of the artificial, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tushman ML and Anderson P (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Adm Sci Quart 31: 439–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Watts DJ and Strogatz SH (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393: 440–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Barr.

Additional information

Financial Support from Zengin Foundation for Studies on Economics and Finance is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barr, J., Hanaki, N. Organizations undertaking complex projects in uncertain environments. J Econ Interact Coord 3, 119–135 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-007-0025-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-007-0025-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation