Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Appraisal of environmental profiles of pasture-based milk production: a case study of dairy farms in the Waikato region, New Zealand

  • LCA FOR AGRICULTURE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Dairying is a relatively intensive livestock production system and contributes to a range of environmental impacts. In the southern hemisphere, dairy farming systems are based mainly on outdoor grazing of permanent pastures. The objectives of this study were to (i) assess environmental profiles and (ii) to identify environmental hotspots in a pasture-based dairy farming system.

Methods

A cradle-to-farm gate life cycle assessment of 53 dairy farms in the Waikato region, New Zealand, was carried out, using 1 kg of fat- and protein-corrected milk as the functional unit. Twelve environmental impact categories were assessed: climate change (CC), ozone depletion potential (ODP), cancer effects (Cancer), non-cancer effects (non-cancer), particulate matter (PM), ionizing radiation (IR), photochemical ozone formation potential (POFP), acidification potential (AP), terrestrial eutrophication potential (TEP), freshwater eutrophication potential (FEP), marine eutrophication potential (MEP) and ecotoxicity for aquatic freshwater (Ecotox). Contribution and sensitivity analyses were performed to determine key hotspots and investigate potential changes in results due to methodological choices.

Results and discussion

The on-farm stage contributed >50 % of the total result for 7 out of 12 indicators (CC, Non-cancer, PM, POFP, AP, TEP, MEP). The off-farm rearing of replacement animals contributed 11–20 % to the total result for all indicators. The production of brought-in (from off-farm) feeds for use on the dairy farms contributed >10 % to the indicator results for Non-cancer (25 %), FEP (15 %), MEP (12 %) and Ecotox (19 %). The manufacturing of agrichemicals for use on the dairy farms contributed >10 % to the indicator results for ODP (26 %), Cancer (26 %), PM (19 %), IR (46 %), FEP (25 %) and Ecotox (42 %). The transportation of off-farm inputs for use on the dairy farms contributed >10 % to the impacts on ODP (15 %), IR (21 %) and POFP (11 %). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the influence of choices associated with data sources, inventories and impact assessment models on the results.

Conclusions

The off-farm activities together contributed >50 % to 5 out of 12 impact indicator results, >45 % to a further two impact indicator results and 32 % of the CC result. Therefore, environmental improvement options should focus on both on-farm and off-farm activities. A focus on just one impact category (such as CC) risks ignoring the environmental hotspots that are revealed in a more comprehensive environmental assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agri-Footprint (2014) Agri-footprint: Description of data. V 1.0. Blonk Agri-footprint BV, Gouda, The Netherlands

  • Astudillo MF, Thalwitz G, Vollrath F (2014) Life cycle assessment of Indian silk. J Cleaner Prod 81:158–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audsley E, Alber S, Clift R, Cowell S, Crettaz P, Gaillard G, Hausheer J, Jolliet O, Kleijn R, Mortensen B, Pearce D, Teulon H, Weidema B, van Zeijts H (2003) Harmonisation of environmental life cycle assessment for agriculture

  • Basset-Mens C, Ledgard S, Boyes M (2009) Eco-efficiency of intensification scenarios for milk production in New Zealand. Ecol Econ 68(6):1615–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battini F, Agostini A, Boulamanti AK, Giuntoli J, Amaducci S (2014) Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley. Sci Total Environ 481:196–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berthoud A, Maupu P, Huet C, Poupart A (2011) Assessing freshwater ecotoxicity of agricultural products in life cycle assessment (LCA): a case study of wheat using French agricultural practices databases and USEtox model. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(8):841–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark D, Malcolm B, Jacobs J (2013) Dairying in the antipodes: recent past, near prospects. Anim Prod Sci 53:882–893

    Google Scholar 

  • DairyNZ (2011) New Zealand Dairy Statistics 2010/2011. DairyNZ Limited. www.dairynz.co.nz/dairystatistics

  • DairyNZ (2013) New Zealand Dairy Statistics 2012/2013. DairyNZ Limited. www.dairynz.co.nz/dairystatistics.

  • DairyNZ (2014) Young stock target liveweights. http://www.dairynz.co.nz.

  • de Vries M, de Boer IJM (2010) Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livest Sci 128(1-3):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Prado A, Misselbrook T, Chadwick D, Hopkins A, Dewhurst RJ, Davison P, Butler A, Schroder J, Scholefield D (2011) SIMSDAIRY: a modelling framework to identify sustainable dairy farms in the UK. Framework description and test for organic systems and N fertiliser optimisation. Sci Total Environ 409(19):3993–4009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC-JRC-IES (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—general guide for life cycle assessment–detailed guidance. First edition edn. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • EC-JRC-IES (2011) Recommendations based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors for life cycle assessment in European context. ILCD Handbook-International Reference Life Cycle Data System. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • ecoinvent Centre (2013) ecoinvent data v3.0. Swiss Centre for life cycle inventories. www.ecoinvent.org.

  • European Food SCP Roundtable (2013) ENVIFOOD Protocol, Environmental assessment of food and drink protocol. European Food Sustainable Consumption and Production Round Table (SCP RT), Working Group 1, Brussels, Belgium

  • Fantin V, Buttol P, Pergreffi R, Masoni P (2012) Life cycle assessment of Italian high quality milk production. A comparison with an EPD study. J Cleaner Prod 28:150–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions from the dairy sector: a life cycle assessment. Food and Aricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manage 91(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flysjö A, Cederberg C, Henriksson M, Ledgard S (2011a) How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(5):420–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flysjö A, Henriksson M, Cederberg C, Ledgard S, Englund J-E (2011b) The impact of various parameters on the carbon footprint of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. Agric Syst 104(6):459–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebrehanna MM, Gordon RJ, Madani A, VanderZaag AC, Wood JD (2014) Silage effluent management: a review. J Environ Manage 143:113–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guerci M, Bava L, Zucali M, Sandrucci A, Penati C, Tamburini A (2013) Effect of farming strategies on environmental impact of intensive dairy farms in Italy. J Dairy Res 80(03):300–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasler K, Bröring S, Omta SWF, Olfs HW (2015) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of different fertilizer product types. Eur J Agron 69:41–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild M, Goedkoop M, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Margni M, Schryver A, Humbert S, Laurent A, Sala S, Pant R (2013) Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(3):683–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • International Dairy Federation (2010) A common carbon footprint approach for dairy: The IDF guide to standard lifecycle assessment methodology for the dairy sector. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standard Organization (2006a) ISO 14040: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Standard Organization, Geneve

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standard Organization (2006b) ISO 14044: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Standard Organization, Geneve

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis SC, Ledgard S (2002) Ammonia emissions from intensive dairying: a comparison of contrasting systems in the United Kingdom and New Zealand. Agr Ecosyst Environ 92(1):83–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg R, Nehring R, Grube A, Goss D, Plotkin S (2002) Environmental indicators of pesticide leaching and runoff from farm fields. In: Ball VE, Norton G (eds) Agricultural Productivity, vol 2. Studies in Productivity and Efficiency. Springer US, pp 213-256

  • Kiefer LR, Menzel F, Bahrs E (2015) Integration of ecosystem services into the carbon footprint of milk of south German dairy farms. J Environ Manage 152:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolver E Nutrition guidelines for the high producing dairy cow. In: Lomas J (ed) Proceedings of the Ruakura Dairy Farmers Conference, Hamilton, New Zealand, 2000. pp 17-28

  • Laurent A, Hauschild MZ (2014) Impacts of NMVOC emissions on human health in European countries for 2000–2010: use of sector-specific substance profiles. Atmos Environ 85:247–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard S, Boyes M (2013) Temporal trends in use of supplementary feeds on farms in New Zealand: report prepared for Ministry for Primary Industries. AgResearch, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard S, Brier G (2004) Estimation of the proportion of animal excreta transferred to the farm dairy effluent system. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard S, Schils R, Eriksen J, Luo J (2009) Environmental impacts of grazed clover/grass pastures. Irish J Agr Food Res 48(2):209–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard SF, Boyes M, Brentrup F (2011) Life cycle assessment of local and imported fertilisers used on New Zealand farms. In: Currie LD, Christensen CL (eds) Adding to the knowledge base for the nutrient manager. Fertilizer and Lime Research Centre, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod CJ, Moller H (2006) Intensification and diversification of New Zealand agriculture since 1960: an evaluation of current indicators of land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 115(1–4):201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manktelow D, Stevens P, Walker J, Gurnsey S, Park N, Zabkiewicz J, Teulon D, Rahman A (2005) Trends in pesticide use in New Zealand: 2004. Ministry of the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy S, Hirst C, Donaghy D, Gray D, Wood B (2014) Opportunities to improve grazing management. In: Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, pp 75-80

  • Ministry for Primary Industries (2013) Detailed methodologies for agricultural greenhouse gas emission calculation: version 2. Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (2013) Energy in New Zealand 2013. Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Moot D, Mills A, Lucas D, Scott W (2009) Country pasture/forage resource profiles: New Zealand. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Myhre GDS, Bréon F-M, Collins W, Fuglestvedt J, Huang J, Koch D, Lamarque J-F, Lee D, Mendoza B, Nakajima T, Robock A, Stephens G, Takemura T, Zhang H (2013) Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA, pp 659–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Schnetzer J (2011) Methods of assessment of direct field emissions for LCIs of agricultural production systems. Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station, Zurich, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Schnetzer J, Reinhard J (2014) Updated and harmonised greenhouse gas emissions for crop inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess:1-18. doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0712-7

  • Nguyen TTH, Doreau M, Corson MS, Eugene M, Delaby L, Chesneau G, Gallard Y, Van der Werf HMG (2013) Effect of dairy production system, breed and co-product handling methods on environmental impacts at farm level. J Environ Manage 120:127–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niero M, Pizzol M, Bruun HG, Thomsen M (2014) Comparative life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment in Denmark including sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. J Cleaner Prod 68:25–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien D, Brennan P, Humphreys J, Ruane E, Shalloo L (2014a) An appraisal of carbon footprint of milk from commercial grass-based dairy farms in Ireland according to a certified life cycle assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1469–1481. doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0755-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien D, Capper JL, Garnsworthy PC, Grainger C, Shalloo L (2014b) A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 97(3):1835–1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD/FAO (2013) Dairy. In: OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2013. OECD Publishing, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt RL, Stevenson BA, Dymond JR, Schipper LA, Baisden WT, Ballantine DJ (2012) Nitrogen inputs and outputs for New Zealand from 1990 to 2010 at national and regional scales. N Z J Agric Res 55(3):241–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzol M, Christensen P, Schmidt J, Thomsen M (2011) Impacts of “metals” on human health: a comparison between nine different methodologies for life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). J Cleaner Prod 19(6–7):646–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Place SE, Mitloehner FM (2010) Invited review: contemporary environmental issues: a review of the dairy industry’s role in climate change and air quality and the potential of mitigation through improved production efficiency. J Dairy Sci 93(8):3407–3416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pré Consultants (2013) SimaPro 8.0 Life cycle assessment software. Amersfoort, The Netherlands

  • Rawnsley R, Donaghy D, Stevens D (2007) What is limiting production and consumption of perennial ryegrass in temperate dairy regions of Australia and New Zealand. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Dairy Science Symposium: Meeting the Challenges for Pasture-Based Dairying. The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, pp 18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisinger A, Ledgard S (2013) Impact of greenhouse gas metrics on the quantification of agricultural emissions and farm-scale mitigation strategies: a New Zealand case study. Environ Res Lett 8(2):025019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum R, Bachmann T, Gold L, Huijbregts MJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen H, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone T, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, Meent D, Hauschild M (2008) USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(7):532–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum R, Anton A, Bengoa X, Bjørn A, Brain R, Bulle C, Cosme N, Dijkman T, Fantke P, Felix M, Geoghegan T, Gottesbüren B, Hammer C, Humbert S, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Lewis F, Maxime D, Nemecek T, Payet J, Räsänen K, Roux P, Schau E, Sourisseau S, van Zelm R, von Streit B, Wallman M (2015) The Glasgow consensus on the delineation between pesticide emission inventory and impact assessment for LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(6):765–776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rotz CA, Soder KJ, Skinner RH, Dell CJ, Kleinman PJ, Schmidt JP, Bryant RB (2009) Grazing can reduce the environmental impact of dairy production systems. Forage and Grazinglands 7 (1):online doi:10.1094/FG-2009-0916-1001-RS. doi:10.1094/FG-2009-0916-01-RS

  • Rotz CA, Chianese DS, Montes F, Hafner S (2013) Dairy Gas Emissions Model: Reference Manual Version 3.0. Pasture systems and watershed management research unit, Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture

  • Safa M, Samarasinghe S, Mohssen M (2011) A field study of energy consumption in wheat production in Canterbury, New Zealand. Energy Convers Manage 52(7):2526–2532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Haberl H, Popp A, K-h E, Lauk C, Harper R, Tubiello FN, de Siqueira PA, Jafari M, Sohi S, Masera O, Böttcher H, Berndes G, Bustamante M, Ahammad H, Clark H, Dong H, Elsiddig EA, Mbow C, Ravindranath NH, Rice CW, Robledo Abad C, Romanovskaya A, Sperling F, Herrero M, House JI, Rose S (2013) How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Global Change Biol 19(8):2285–2302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatisticsNZ (2013) Agricultural Production Statistics: June 2012 (final). http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/industry_sectors/agriculture-horticulture-forestry/AgriculturalProduction_final_HOTPJun12final.aspx.

  • StatisticsNZ (2014) Energy Use Survey – information releases (New Zealand Energy Use: Primary industries 2008)

  • Thoma G, Jolliet O, Wang Y (2013a) A biophysical approach to allocation of life cycle environmental burdens for fluid milk supply chain analysis. Int Dairy J 31 (Supplement 1):S41-S49

  • Thoma G, Popp J, Shonnard D, Nutter D, Matlock M, Ulrich R, Kellogg W, Kim DS, Neiderman Z, Kemper N, Adom F, East C (2013b) Regional analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from USA dairy farms: a cradle to farm-gate assessment of the American dairy industry circa 2008. Int Dairy J 31 (Supplement 1):S29-S40

  • Thomas S, Fraser T, Curtin D, Brown H, Lawrence E (2011) Review of nitrous oxide emission factors and activity data for crops. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen MA, van Calker KJ, Smits MCJ, Iepema GL, de Boer IJM (2008) Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands. Agric Syst 96(1-3):95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van linden V, Herman L (2014) A fuel consumption model for off-road use of mobile machinery in agriculture. Energy 77(0):880–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waghorn G What is dietary metabolisable energy? In: Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 2007. pp 153-159

  • Wales WJ, Kolver ES, Egan AR, Roche R (2009) Effects of strain of Holstein-Friesian and concentrate supplementation on the fatty acid composition of milk fat of dairy cows grazing pasture in early lactation. J Dairy Sci 92(1):247–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webb J, Hutchings N, Amon B, Dämmgen U, Baas J, Pain B, Chao AF, Lekkerkerk L, Runge E, Münch J, Kachniarz M, Lubera K (2013) Agriculture other including use of pesticides. EMEP/EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook 2013: Technical Guidance to Prepare National Emission Inventories. Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Wheeler D, Ledgard S, De Klein C, Monaghan R, Carey P, McDowell R, Johns K (2003) OVERSEER® nutrient budgets—moving towards on-farm resource accounting. In: Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, p 191-194

  • Yan MJ, Humphreys J, Holden NM (2013) The carbon footprint of pasture-based milk production: can white clover make a difference? J Dairy Sci 96(2):857–865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y (2013) Life cycle freshwater ecotoxicity, human health cancer, and noncancer impacts of corn ethanol and gasoline in the U.S. J Cleaner Prod 53:149–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is a part of a PhD project funded by the New Zealand Life Cycle Management Centre (NZLCM) and AgResearch. We are grateful to DairyNZ for the provision of farm survey data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AgResearch, Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand

    Jeerasak Chobtang, Stewart F. Ledgard & Marlies Zonderland-Thomassen

  2. Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand

    Jeerasak Chobtang & Sarah J. McLaren

  3. New Zealand Life Cycle Management Centre, c/o Massey University, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand

    Jeerasak Chobtang, Stewart F. Ledgard, Sarah J. McLaren & Marlies Zonderland-Thomassen

  4. Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand

    Daniel J. Donaghy

Authors
  1. Jeerasak Chobtang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stewart F. Ledgard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah J. McLaren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marlies Zonderland-Thomassen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daniel J. Donaghy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah J. McLaren.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Greg Thoma

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 49.2 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chobtang, J., Ledgard, S., McLaren, S.J. et al. Appraisal of environmental profiles of pasture-based milk production: a case study of dairy farms in the Waikato region, New Zealand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21, 311–325 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1033-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1033-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation