Abstract
Purpose
Disposable beverage bottles made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) stand in sharp contrast to many other disposable plastic packaging systems in the US for their high level of post-consumer recovery for recycling. This is due in part to container deposit programs in several US states, such as the California Redemption Value (CRV) program. We investigate the impacts of PET bottle recycling in the CRV program to evaluate its effectiveness at reducing environmental burdens.
Methods
We develop a life cycle model using standard process LCA techniques. We use the US LCI database to describe the energy production infrastructure and the production of primary materials. We describe the inventory and logistical requirements for materials recovery on the basis of state-maintained statistics and interviews with operators and industry representatives. We report inventory indicators describing energy, freight, and waste disposal requirements. We report several impact indicators based on CML and TRACI-2.0 techniques. We apply system expansion to compare post-consumer activities to produce secondary polymer against equivalent primary production.
Results and discussion
While bottle collection is distributed across the state, processing is more centralized and occurs primarily near urban centers. The average distance traveled by a bottle from discard to recovery is 145–175 km. Recycling requires 0.45–0.66 MJ of primary energy/L of beverage, versus 3.96 MJ during the pre-consumer phase. Post-consumer environmental impacts are significantly lower than pre-consumer impacts, with the exception of eutrophication. The results are robust to model sensitivity, with allocation of fuel for bottle collection being the most significant parameter. Curbside collection is slightly more energy efficient than consumer drop-off, and is subject to smaller parametric uncertainty. Recycling has the potential for net environmental benefits in five of seven impact categories, the exceptions being smog (marginal benefits) and eutrophication (increased impacts).
Conclusions
California’s decentralized program for collecting and processing PET bottles has produced a system which generates a large stream of post-consumer material with minimal environmental impact. The selection of a reclamation locale is the most significant factor influencing post-consumer impacts. If secondary PET displaces primary material, several environmental burdens can be reduced.
Recommendations and perspectives
Our results suggest that deposit programs on disposable packaging are an effective policy mechanism to increase material recovery and reduce environmental burdens. Deposit programs for other packaging systems should be considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Hawaii’s program is modeled after California’s and has similar characteristics.
References
Anonymous (2006) Beverage Market Index 2006. BeverageWorld, May 2006
Argonne National Laboratory (2010) Argonne GREET Model. Retrieved May 3, 2011, from http://greet.es.anl.gov/
Ashenmiller B (2009) Cash recycling, waste disposal costs, and the incomes of the working poor: evidence from California. Land Econ 85(3):539–551
Association of Postconsumer Plastics Recyclers (2011) Post-consumer PET Bottle Model Bale Specification. Retrieved from http://www.plasticsrecycling.org/images/stories/doc/pet_bottle_model_bale_spec.pdf
Bare JC (2011) TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13(5):687–696
Beigl P, Salhofer S (2004) Comparison of ecological effects and costs of communal waste management systems. Resour Conserv Recycl 41(2):83–102
Berck P, Goldman G (2003) California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Study (No. 5000–009). California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). Retrieved from http://calrecycle.ca.gov/BevContainer/Publications/UCStudy2003.pdf
Beverage Digest (2008) Fact book 2008—statistical yearbook of non-alcoholic beverages. Beverage Digest, Bedford Hills
Boustead I (2005) PET bottles. Eco-profiles of the European plastics industry. Association of Plastics Manufacturers, Europe, Brussels
Brown MR (2010) Biannual Report of Beverage Container Sales, Returns, Redemption, and Recycling Rates. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). Retrieved from http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/bevcontainer/Notices/2010/Biannual.pdf
California Air Resources Board (2006) EMFAC2007 Release. Retrieved May 3, 2011, from http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/onroad/latest_version.htm
California Air Resources Board (2007a) Facts about the California Air Resources Board’s Waste Collection Vehicle Regulation. Retrieved from http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/swcv/trashtruck.pdf
California Air Resources Board (2007b) Facts about California’s accomplishments in reducing diesel particulate matter emissions. Retrieved from http://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/factsheets/dieselpmfs.pdf
California Department of Finance (2010) California county population estimates and components of change by year. Retrieved May 3, 2011, from http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/reports/estimates/e-2/2000-10/view.php
California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) (2011a). Beverage container recycling programs defined. Retrieved May 3, 2011, from http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/BevContainer/Recyclers/RecycleProgs.htm
CalRecycle (2009) Market analysis for recycled beverage container materials: 2009 update. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), Sacramento
CalRecycle (2011b) Frequently asked questions. Retrieved December 20, 2011, from http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/BevContainer/Consumers/FAQ.htm
Chester M, Martin E, Sathaye N (2008) Energy, greenhouse gas, and cost reductions for municipal recycling systems. Environ Sci Technol 42(6):2142–2149
Chilton T, Burnley S, Nesaratnam S (2010) A life cycle assessment of the closed-loop recycling and thermal recovery of post-consumer PET. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(12):1241–1249
Container Recycling Institute (2008) Recycling and wasting trends: conclusions from the 2008 Beverage Market Data Analysis. Container Recycling Institute. Retrieved from http://www.container-recycling.org/assets/pdfs/reports/2008-BMDA-conclusions.pdf
Ekvall T, Tillman A-M (1997) Open-loop recycling: criteria for allocation procedures. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2(3):155–162
Ekvall T, Weidema BP (2004) System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(3):161–171
Franklin Associates (2009) Life Cycle assessment of drinking water systems: bottle water, tap water, and home/office delivery water (No. 09-LQ-104). Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
Franklin Associates (2010) Life cycle inventory of 100% Postconsumer HDPE and PET recycled resin from postconsumer containers and packaging. Prairie Village
Franklin Associates (2007) Cradle-to-gate life cycle inventory of nine plastic resins and two polyurethane precursors. American Chemistry Council, Prairie Village
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Doka G, Dones R et al (2007) Overview and methodology. Ecoinvent data v2.0, No. 1. Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf
Gleick PH, Cooley HS (2009) Energy implications of bottled water. Environ Res Lett 4(1):014009
Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R et al (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Hischier R (2007) Life cycle inventories of packaging and graphical papers. Ecoinvent-report No. 11. Part II—plastics (No. 11). Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, pp 171–186
Kuczenski B, Geyer R (2010) Material flow analysis of polyethylene terephthalate in the US, 1996–2007. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(12):1161–1169
Madival S, Auras R, Singh SP, Narayan R (2009) Assessment of the environmental profile of PLA, PET and PS clamshell containers using LCA methodology. J Clean Prod 17(13):1183–1194
National Association for PET Container Resources (2010) 2009 Report on Post Consumer PET Container Recycling Activity (p. 11). National Association for PET Container Resources. Retrieved from http://www.napcor.com/PET/pet_reports.html
Shen L, Worrell E, Patel MK (2010) Open-loop recycling: a LCA case study of PET bottle-to-fibre recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(1):34–52
US Environmental Protection Agency (2009) eGrid 2007 Version 1.1. US Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/egrid/index.html
US Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Municipal solid waste in the United States: 2009 Facts and Figures (No. EPA530-R-10-012). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington
US LCI (2011) NREL: U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database Home Page. Retrieved May 3, 2011, from http://www.nrel.gov/lci/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Hans-Jürgen Garvens
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOC 115 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuczenski, B., Geyer, R. PET bottle reverse logistics—environmental performance of California’s CRV program. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18, 456–471 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0495-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0495-7