Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Taking into account water use impacts in the LCA of biofuels: an Argentinean case study

  • WATER USE IN LCA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The assessment of biofuels has until now mainly focused on energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions. Only little attention has been given to other impacts, although the general importance of water use for the life cycle assessment (LCA) of agricultural products has been recognized in recent publications. The aim of this work is to assess in detail the water consumption along a biofuel production chain taking into account irrigation efficiencies, levels of water scarcity, and type of feedstock, and to integrate those results in a full LCA. Furthermore, we compare the results for biofuels from various feedstocks and regions with conventional petrol.

Methods

We calculate the water consumption and overall life cycle assessment results in a case study for the production of methyl ester from irrigated and non-irrigated rapeseed. The results are compared with other irrigated and non-irrigated biofuels based on different feedstocks.

Results and discussion

Water consumption in biofuel production chains based on non-irrigated crops does not vary greatly and is in the same range as for fossil fuel. In contrast, as a consequence of irrigation, agricultural water consumption dominates the overall results of all irrigated crops. Consequently, the level of water scarcity plays a key role for the LCA results. In our case study, the environmental impacts of methyl ester from irrigated rapeseed in a water-scarce region, measured in aggregated Eco-Indicator 99 scores, are almost doubled by water consumption. Variations in irrigation efficiency, however, are of little influence on the results, as the assessment method used here is based on consumptive water, which depends mainly on the evapotranspiration of the crop.

Conclusions

The focus on greenhouse gas emissions of the main regulatory schemes neglects other relevant environmental impacts and may provide the wrong incentives. Water consumption may thus become a major concern, offsetting the benefits of biofuel use with respect to climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alturria L (2008) Cultivos energéticos: estimación de costos de producción. Oral presentation, 9 May 2008. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, UNCuyo., Mendoza, Argentina

  • Arena AP, Canizo JR, Sanchez BM (2002) Perfil ambiental de la generación termoeléctrica en la Argentian en el cuatrienio 1997–2000. Avances en Energías Renovables y Medio Ambiente 6(2):7–12

    Google Scholar 

  • California Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard—volume I. Staff report: initial statement of reasons

  • Chiu Y-W, Walseth B, Suh S (2009) Water embodied in bioethanol in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 43(8):2688–2692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colomer JS, Emili L, Castillo X, Kristich C (2008) Personal communications collected in interviews with Ing Dr. Jorge Silva Colomer (INTA Junin), Luis Emili (UNCuyo), Ing Xavier Castillo (INTA La Consulta), Ing. Carlos Kristich (Municipality Alvear)

  • De Fraiture C, Berndes G (2009) Biofuels and water. In: Howarth RW, Bringezu S (eds) Biofuels: environmental consequences and interactions with changing land use: proceedings of the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE) International Biofuels Project Rapid Assessment, 22–25 September 2008, Gummersbach, Germany. Cornell University, Ithaca, pp 139–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez-Faus R, Powers SE, Burken JG, Alvarez PJ (2009) The water footprint of biofuels: a drink or drive issue? Environ Sci Technol 43(9):3005–3010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donato L, Huerga I, Hilbert J (2008) Principales Insumos en la Producción de Biocombustibles. Un Análisis Económico. Balance Energético de los cultivos potenciales para la producción de biocombustibles. . Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA)—Istituto de Ingenieria Rural–CIA–CNIA., Castellar, Argentina

  • Donato L, Iriarte L (2008) Personal communications collected in interviews with Ing. Lidia Donato (INTA Castellar) and Ing. L. Iriarte (INTA Barrow)

  • European Parliament (2000) Directive 98/69/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to measures to be taken against air pollution by emissions from motor vehicles and amending Council Directive 70/220/EEC

  • European Parliament (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. vol COM(2008)0019–C6-0046/2008–2008/0016(COD)

  • Faist Emmenegger M, Reinhard J, Zah R (2009) SQCB—sustainability quick check for biofuels. Second draft, 18th February 2009—intermediate background report. With contributions from T. Ziep, R. Weichbrodt, Prof. Dr. V. Wohlgemuth, FHTW Berlin and A. Roches, R. Freiermuth Knuchel, Dr. G. Gaillard, Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon. Empa, Dübendorf, Switzerland

  • FAO (2008) CROPWAT 4.3 Decision Support System (Food and Agriculture Organization)

  • Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Doka G, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G, Spielmann M, Wernet G (2007) Overview and methodology. Ecoinvent report No. 1. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2001) The Eco-Indicator 99: a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment: methodology report. Publikatiereeks produktenbeleid; nr. 36A. Ministerie van Volkshiusvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, Den Haag

  • Iriarte LB (2002) Colza: cultivares, fechas de siembra, fertilizacion. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow, Tres Arroyos, Argentina

  • Jungbluth N, Chudacoff M, Dauriat A, Dinkel F, Doka G, Faist Emmenegger M, Gnansounou E, Kljun N, Schleiss K, Spielmann M, Stettler C, Sutter J (2007) Life cycle inventories of bioenergy. Ecoinvent report no. 17. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf

    Google Scholar 

  • MinöStV (2008) Mineralölsteuerverordnung (MinöStV), Änderung vom 30. Januar 2008

  • Nemecek T, Kägi T (2007) Life cycle inventories of Swiss and European agricultural production systems. Final report ecoinvent V2.0 No. 15a

  • Pfister S, Bayer P, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2011) Environmental impacts of water use in global crop production: hotspots and trade-offs with land use. Environ Sci Technol 45(13):5761–5768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43(11):4098–4104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • PRé Consultants (2006) Simapro 7

  • Rodríguez P (2008 ) Oral communication by Ing. Patricio Rodríguez, Departamento de Irrigación, 12.03.2008

  • Service RF (2009) Another biofuels drawback: the demand for irrigation. Science 326(5952):516–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shiklomanov IA, Rodda JC (eds) (2003) World water resources at the beginning of the 21st century. International hydrology series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zah R, Böni H, Gauch M, Hischier R, Lehmann M, Empa PW (2007) Ökobilanz von Energieprodukten: Ökologische Bewertung von Biotreibstoffen. BfE/BAFU/BLW, Bern, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Civil Service Authorities in Switzerland for their support of the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mireille Faist Emmenegger.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Thomas Koellner

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 79 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faist Emmenegger, M., Pfister, S., Koehler, A. et al. Taking into account water use impacts in the LCA of biofuels: an Argentinean case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16, 869–877 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0327-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0327-1

Keywords

Navigation