Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technology transfer, specific local knowledge and entrepreneurial partner control in international joint ventures

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has sought to demonstrate the influence of control of an IJV on achieving the learning objectives of the partners involved. However, the effect that certain types of learning have on the control of the IJV, which are vital for the success of the internationalization of the entrepreneurial firm, has yet to be explored. The results from case studies of six IJVs show that, during the post-formation stage, the configuration of entrepreneurial partner control over the IJV is conditioned by both technology transfer and by learning specific local knowledge by the entrepreneurial partner. The study also shows that the negative relation between trust and control suggested by the literature is limited to cases where trust has broken down. Greater levels of trust are also compatible with greater control with a view to appropriately exploiting when firms see the need to intensify control or need to implement new control mechanisms in order to properly exploit the resources contributed to the IJV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, J. (2011). Strategic resources and firm performance. Management Decision, 49(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J., & Kask, J. (2012). Asymmetrically realized absorptive capacity and relationship durability. Management Decision, 50(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anh, P. T. T., Baughn, C. C., Hang, N. T. M., & Neupert, K. E. (2006). Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical study in Vietnam. International Business Review, 15(5), 463–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, S. H., Roy, M., & Gilliland, T. (2011). Globalization of performance appraisals: theory and applications. Management Decision, 49(4), 570–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariño, A. (2001). To do or not to do? non cooperative behavior by commission and omission in interfirm ventures. Group & Organization Management, 26(1), 4–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barden, J. Q., Steensma, H. K., & Lyles, M. A. (2005). The influence of parent control structure on parent conflict in Vietnamese international joint ventures: an organizational justice-based contingency approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 156–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blodgett, L. L. (1991). Partner contributions as predictors of equity share in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blodgett, L. L. (1992). Factors in the instability of international joint ventures: an event history analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 13(6), 475–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonache, J., Brewster, C., & Suutari, V. (2001). Expatriation: a developing research agenda. Thunderbird International Business Review, 43(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyacigiller, N. (1990). The role of expatriates in the management of interdependence, complexity and risk in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(3), 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D., & Bamossy, G. J. (2006). Post-formation processes in Eastern and Western European joint ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 43(2), 203–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calantone, R. J., & Zhao, Y. S. (2001). Joint ventures in China: a comparative study of Japanese, Korean, and US partners. Journal of International Marketing, 9(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camén, C., Gottfridsson, P., & Rundh, B. (2011). To trust or not to trust? formal contracts and the building of long-term relationships. Management Decision, 49(3), 365–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y., & Xiang, Y. (2012). The impact of knowledge governance on knowledge sharing. Management Decision, 50(4), 591–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E., & Taylor, S. M. (1999). Control in multinational corporations (MNCs): the case of Korean manufacturing subsidiaries. Journal of Management, 25(4), 541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. Y., Hughes, M., & Hotho, S. (2011). Internal and external antecedents of SMEs’ innovation ambidexterity outcomes. Management Decision, 49(10), 1658–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Y. C. (2011). Decision-making biases in the alliance life cycle: implications for alliance failure. Management Decision, 49(3), 350–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaston, I., & Scott, G. J. (2012). Entrepreneurship and open innovation in an emerging economy. Management Decision, 50(7), 1161–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., Faulkner, D., Tallman, P. B. (2005). Cooperative strategy. Oxford University Press.

  • Choi, C. B., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). Split management control and international joint venture performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currall, S. C., & Inkpen, A. C. (2002). A multilevel approach to trust in joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 479–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Kumar, R. (2011). Interpartner negotiations in alliances: a strategic framework. Management Decision, 49(8), 1235–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1996). Risk types and inter-firm alliance structures. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6), 827–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: an integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanaraj, C., Lyles, M. A., Steensma, H. K., & Tihanyi, L. (2004). Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 428–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L. (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 17(Summer Special Issue), 55–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2001). How to make strategic alliances work. Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y. (2011). Influence of parent company’s organizational dimensions on its JV performances-opportunism occurrence and control efficacy. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(7), 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. A., Oczkowski, E., & Kharabsheh, R. (2011). Antecedents and performance consequences of learning success in international joint ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(3), 479–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, L. (2004). Ownership and international joint ventures level of expatriate managers. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 4(1), 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geringer, J. M., & Frayne, C. A. (1990). Human resource management and international joint venture control: a parent company perspective. Management International Review, 30, 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geringer, J. M., & Hebert, L. (1989). Control and performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(2), 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groot, T., & Merchant, K. A. (2000). Control of international joint venture. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25, 579–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 781–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Special Issue), 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heavey, C., & Murphy, E. (2012). A proposed cooperation framework for organisations and their leaders. Management Decision, 50(6), 993–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J. F. (1988). A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 361–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J. F., & Larimo, J. (1998). The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: does national origin affect ownership decisions by foreign direct investors into the United States? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 515–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idris, A., & Tey, L. S. (2011). Exploring the motives and determinants of innovation performance of Malaysian offshore international joint ventures. Management Decision, 49(10), 1623–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Beamish, P. W. (1997). Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Currall, S. C. (1998). The nature, antecedents, and consequences of joint venture trust. Journal of International Management, 4, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Currall, S. C. (2004). The coevolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures. Organization Science, 15(5), 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafari, M., Rezaeenour, J., Mazdeh, M. M., & Hooshmandi, A. (2011). Development and evaluation of a knowledge risk management model for project-based organizations: a multi-stage study. Management Decision, 49(3), 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R., & Szulanski, G. (2004). Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 508–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2007). Building firm capabilities through learning: the role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 981–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., Sing, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., Dyer, D., & Singh, H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 747–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, C., & Etemad, H. (2012). Rapid growth and rapid internationalization: the case of smaller enterprises from Canada. Management Decision, 50(4), 569–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. J., Salk, J., & Lyles, M. (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1139–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, N. H. (2009). Foreign parent firm contributions, experiences, and international joint venture control and performance. International Management Review, 5(1), 56–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. Y., & Huang, Y. C. (2012). Knowledge stock, ambidextrous learning, and firm performance: evidence form technologically intensive industries. Management Decision, 50(6), 1096–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. H. (2012). Knowledge brokering for transference to the pilot’s safety behavior. Management Decision, 50(7), 1326–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. Y., & Hsu, C. W. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of corporate diversification: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Management Decision, 49(9), 1510–1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Shenkar, O., & Nyaw, M. (2001). A dual parent perspective on control and performance in international joint ventures: lessons from a developing economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, M. A., & Reger, R. K. (1993). Managing for autonomy in joint ventures: a longitudinal study of upward influence. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahlendorf, M. D., Rehring, J., Schäffer, U., & Wyszomirski, E. (2012). Influencing foreign subsidiary decisions through headquarter performance measurement systems. Management Decision, 50(4), 688–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A. (1998). Modern management control systems: Text & cases. London: Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. (1994). Differentiated fit and shares values: alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. R., Lee, J. Y., & Hong, S. (2011). Effects of international entry-order strategies on foreign subsidiary exit: the case of Korean chaebols. Management Decision, 49(9), 1471–1488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe, A. (1993). Messy research, methodological predispositions, and theory development in international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 18, 227–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnell, J. A., Lester, D. L., Long, Z., & Köseoglu, M. A. (2012). How environmental uncertainty affects the link between business strategy and performance in SMEs: evidence from China, Turkey, and the USA. Management Decision, 50(4), 546–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenbach, M., & Brettel, M. (2012). CEO experience as micro-level origin of dynamic capabilities. Management Decision, 50(4), 611–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaan, J. L. (1983). Parent control and joint venture success: The case of Mexico. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario.

  • Siegel, D. S., & Renko, M. (2012). The role of market and technological knowledge in recognizing entrepreneurial opportunities. Management Decision, 50(5), 797–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, A., Kumar, V., Schoeman, P., Moffat, P., & Power, D. (2011). Strategic capabilities and their relationship to organisational success and its measures: some pointers from five Australian studies. Management Decision, 49(8), 1305–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, P., & Frankwick, G. L. (2012). Environment, management attitude, and organizational learning in alliances. Management Decision, 49(1), 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensma, H. K., Barden, J. Q., Dhanaraj, C., Lyles, M., & Tihanyi, L. (2008). The evolution and internalization of international joint ventures in a transitioning economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E. W. K. (2002). Acquiring knowledge by entrepreneurial partners from international joint ventures in a transition economy: learning-by-doing and learning myopia. Strategic Management Journal, 23(9), 835–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, L. T. (2012). Behind knowledge transfer. Management Decision, 50(3), 459–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (2005). Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organization Studies, 26(9), 1377–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, A., & Gray, B. (1994). Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States-China joint ventures: a comparative cases study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1478–1517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, T. T., & Li, C. R. (2011). Competence exploration and exploitation in new product development: the moderating effects of environmental dynamism and competitiveness. Management Decision, 49(9), 1444–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Dirección de Empresas. Juan José Renau Piqueras, Universitat de València, Avda. de los Naranjos, s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain

    Antonia Mohedano-Suanes & María del Mar Benavides-Espinosa

Authors
  1. Antonia Mohedano-Suanes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. María del Mar Benavides-Espinosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonia Mohedano-Suanes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohedano-Suanes, A., del Mar Benavides-Espinosa, M. Technology transfer, specific local knowledge and entrepreneurial partner control in international joint ventures. Int Entrep Manag J 9, 95–112 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0244-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0244-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation