Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Demolition and construction recycling unified management: the DECORUM platform for improvement of resource efficiency in the construction sector

  • Waste and Biomass Management & Valorization
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The construction and public work sectors are faced with a series of challenges that will need to be addressed in moving towards an effective circular economy model. The aim of this work was to develop a simple but holistic approach to the management of construction projects in order to ensure compliance with technical standards and environmental criteria right from the set-up phase and to foster an increased use of recycled materials and saving of natural resources. To achieve this goal, a multi-user platform was designed and developed to manage and control all stages and procedures of public work and provide support to all those involved throughout the various stages of implementation. The platform included (1) technical standards; (2) environmental law; (3) databases; (4) technical specifications for public tenders; (5) a tool to assess environmental impacts and circularity; (6) a marketplace to facilitate and transparently manage trading of natural, artificial, and recycled aggregates; (7) interactive catalogues with declarations of building products; and (8) interactive maps for the geolocation of treatment plants, producers, and construction sites. The platform, currently undergoing validation by public administrations, will represent a valuable tool for use in enabling public work contractors to reduce environmental impacts, promote an informed and transparent use of recycled products, and to encourage a more sustainable use of natural resources. The platform will facilitate the application of green public procurement (GPP) which, although mandatory in several countries (e.g., in Italy), continues to encounter a series of problems in implementation. The platform will also enhance compliance with technical standards and minimum environmental criteria (MEC), as recently defined for buildings and road construction and maintenance, thus expanding the market for artificial and recycled aggregates with certified products and guaranteed quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allegrini E, Vadenbo C, Boldrin A, Astrup TF (2015) Life cycle assessment of resource recovery from municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash. J Environ Manag 151:132–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Awoyeraa PO, Adesinab A (2020) Plastic wastes to construction products: status, limitations and future perspective. Case Studies in Construction Materials 12:e00330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassani M, Bertola F, Bianchi M, Canonico F, Marian M (2017) Environmental assessment and geomechanical properties of controlled low-strength materials with recycled and alternative components for cements and aggregates. Cement and Concrete Comp 80:143–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolini L, Carsana M, Cassago D, Quadrio Curzio A, Collepardi M (2004) MSWI ashes as mineral additions in concrete. Cement Concrete Res 34:1899–1906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi G, Pantini S, Rigamonti L (2018) Life cycle assessment of non-hazardous construction and demolition waste (CDW) management in Lombardy region (Italy). J Clean Prod 184:815–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Careddu N, Dino GA (2016) Reuse of residual sludge from stone processing: differences and similarities between sludge coming from carbonate and silicate stones: Italian experiences. Environ Earth Sci 75:1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng JC, Ma LY (2013) A BIM-based system for demolition and renovation waste estimation and planning. Waste Manag 33:1539–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cossu R, Fiore S, Lai T, Luciano A, Mancini G, Ruffino B, Viotti P, Zanetti MC (2014) Review of Italian experience on automotive shredder residue characterization and management. Waste Manag 34:1752–1762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cutaia L, Luciano A, Barberio G, Sbaffoni S, Mancuso E, Scagliarino C, La Monica M (2015) The experience of the first industrial symbiosis platform in Italy. Environ Eng Manag J 7:1521–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU-DG ENV (2017) Resource efficient use of mixed wastes improving management of construction and demolition waste. Final report

  • European Commission, COM 445, 1.7.2014 (2014) Resource efficiency opportunities in the building sector

  • European Commission, COM 571, 20.9.2011 (2011) Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe

  • European Commission COM/2015/0614 final (2015) Closing the loop - an EU action plan for the Circular Economy

  • Gonçalves DRR, Fontes WC, Mendes JC, Silva GJB, Peixoto RAF (2016) Evaluation of the economic feasibility of a processing plant for steelmaking slag. Waste Manage Res 34(2):107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner A, Ott S, Winter S (2014) Recycling and end-of-life scenarios for timber structures. In: Aicher S, Reinhardt HW, Garrecht H (eds) Materials and Joints in Timber Structures. RILEM Bookseries, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht

  • ISPRA (2015) Rapporto Rifiuti Speciali

  • Jin R, Hancock CM, Tang L, Chen C, Wanatowski D, Yang L (2017a) An empirical study of BIM-implementation-based perceptions among Chinese practitioners. J Manag Eng 33(5):04017025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin R, Li B, Zhou T, Wanatowski D, Piroozfar P (2017b) An empirical study of perceptions towards construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China. Resour Conserv Recy 126:86–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehagia F (2009) Skid resistance performance of asphalt wearing courses with electric arc furnace slag aggregates. Waste Manage Res 27(3):288–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kern AP, Dias MF, Kulakowski MP, Gomes LP (2015) Waste generated in high-rise buildings construction: a quantification model based on statistical multiple regression. Waste Manag 39:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokalj F, Samec N, Jurič B (2005) Utilization of bottom ash from the incineration of separated wastes as a cement substitute. Waste Manage Res 23(5):468–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhang X (2013) Web-based construction waste estimation system for building construction projects. Autom Constr 35:142–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Chen Z, Yong L, Kong SC (2005) Application of integrated GPS and GIS technology for reducing construction waste and improving construction efficiency. Autom Constr 14:323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CF, Wu CH, Ho HM (2006) Recovery of municipal waste incineration bottom ash and water treatment sludge to water permeable pavement materials. Waste Manag 26:970–978

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lintz RCC, Seydell MRR (2009) Evaluation of tire rubber disposal in concrete for pavements. J Urban Environ Eng 3(2):52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llatas C, Osmani M (2016) Development and validation of a building design waste reduction model. Waste Manag 56:318–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Yuan H (2010) Exploring critical success factors for waste management in construction projects of China. Resour Conserv Recy 55:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luciano A, Barberio G, Mancuso E, Sbaffoni S, La Monica M, Scagliarino C, Cutaia L (2016) Potential improvement of the methodology for industrial symbiosis implementation at regional scale. Waste Biomass Valori 7:1007–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luciano A, Reale P, Cutaia L, Carletti R, Pentassuglia R, Elmo G, Mancini G (2018) Resources optimization and sustainable waste management in construction chain in Italy: toward a resource efficiency plan. Waste and biomass Valorization. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0533-1

  • Mancini G, Viotti P, Luciano A, Raboni M, Fino D (2014a) Full scale treatment of ASR wastes in a modified rotary kiln. Waste Manag 34(11):2347–2354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini G, Viotti P, Luciano A, Fino D (2014b) On the ASR and ASR thermal residues characterization of full scale treatment plant. Waste Manag 34:448–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini G, Nicosia FG, Luciano A, Viotti P, Fino D (2017) An approach to an insular self-contained waste management system with the aim of maximizing recovery while limiting transportation costs. Waste Biomass Valori 8:1617–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Morales M, Zamorano M, Ruiz-Moyanoa A, Valverde-Espinosa I (2011) Characterization of recycled aggregates construction and demolition waste for concrete production following the Spanish structural concrete code EHE-08. Constr Build Mater 25(2:742–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mélon L (2020) More than a nudge? Arguments and tools for mandating green public procurement in the EU. Sustainability 12(3):988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercader-Moyano MP, Ramirez-de-Arellano-Agudo A (2013) Selective classification and quantification model of C&D waste from material resources consumed in residential building construction. Waste Manag Res 31:458–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migliore M, Campioli A, Lavagna M, Oberti I, Paganin G, Talamo C (2015) Intersectorial reuse of waste and scraps for the production of building products: strategies and valorization of waste. Environ Eng Manag J 14:1675–1681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco-Torgal F (2014) Eco-efficient construction and building materials research under the EU framework Programme horizon 2020. Constr Build Mater 51:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantini S, Giurato M, Rigamonti L (2019) A LCA study to investigate resource-efficient strategies for managing post-consumer gypsum waste in Lombardy region (Italy). Resour Conserv Recycl 147:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao A, Jha KN, Misra S (2007) Use of aggregates from recycled construction and demolition waste in concrete. Resour Conserv Recy 50:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondi L, Bregoli G, Sorlini S, Cominoli L, Collivignarelli C, Plizzari G (2016) Concrete with EAF steel slag as aggregate: a comprehensive technical and environmental characterization. Compos B Eng 90:195–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sáez VP, Porras-Amores C, del Río MM (2015) New quantification proposal for construction waste generation in new residential constructions. J Clean Prod 102:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sáez VP, Álvarez Alonso M., Sagarruy de la Rosa, A., 2019. Web-based tool for construction and demolition waste. In: International Conference on Technological Innovation in Building, Madrid

  • Tasneem KM, Eun J, Nam B (2017) Leaching behaviour of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash mixed with hot-mix asphalt and Portland cement concrete used as road construction materials. Road Mater Pavement 18(3):687–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari B, Ajmera B, Moubayed S, Lemmon A, Styler K, Martinez JG (2014) Improving geotechnical behavior of clayey soils with shredded rubber tires: preliminary study. Geotech Sp 234:3734–3743

    Google Scholar 

  • Toraldo E, Saponaro S, Careghini A, Mariani E (2013) Use of stabilized bottom ash for bound layers of road pavements. J Environ Manag 121:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnäs A, Balfors B, Faith-Ell C (2009) Environmental consideration in procurement of construction contracts: current practice, problems and opportunities in green procurement in the Swedish construction industry. J Clean Prod 17(13):1214–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Chen SS, Tsang DCW, Poon CP, Shih K (2016) Value-added recycling of construction waste wood into noise and thermal insulating cement-bonded particleboards. Constr Build Mater 125:316–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong JKW, San Chan JK, Wadu MJ (2016) Facilitating effective green procurement in construction projects: an empirical study of the enablers. J Clean Prod 135: 859–871. Construction and Building Materials

  • Zanni S, Simion IM, Bamonti S, Bonoli A, Gavrilescu M, Bignozzi MC (2014) Construction & demolition waste: a comparative case study toward eco-designed concrete. Procedia Environmental Science, Engineering and Management 1(2):155–160

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The DECORUM project was co-financed under the European Regional Development Fund – ROP ERDF LAZIO 2014-2020, Green and smart building call. BURL n. 6 18/01/2018. Project code: A0118-2017-13714.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development – Department for Sustainability, Resource Valorization Lab, ENEA – Casaccia Research Centre, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123, Rome, Italy

    Antonella Luciano & Laura Cutaia

  2. Contento Trade S. r. l, Via Vieris 11, Pozzuolo del Friuli, (UD), Italy

    Flavio Cioffi

  3. Softlab S. p. A, P. le Konrad Adenauer 3, Rome, Italy

    Claudio Sinibaldi

Authors
  1. Antonella Luciano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura Cutaia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Flavio Cioffi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Claudio Sinibaldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonella Luciano.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luciano, A., Cutaia, L., Cioffi, F. et al. Demolition and construction recycling unified management: the DECORUM platform for improvement of resource efficiency in the construction sector. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 24558–24569 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09513-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09513-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation