Abstract
Thirteen-year monitoring of the vegetation growing in the industrial and adjacent areas of an oil refinery showed the prevalence of yellow medick (Medicago falcata L.) over other plant species, including alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). A comparative field study of the two Medicago species established that yellow medick and alfalfa exhibited similar resistance to soil petroleum hydrocarbons and that the pollutant concentration in their rhizosphere was 30% lower than that in the surrounding bulk soil. In laboratory pot experiments, yellow medick reduced the contaminant content by 18% owing to the degradation of the major heavy oil fractions, such as paraffins, naphthenes, and alcohol and benzene tars; and it was more successful than alfalfa. Both species were equally effective in stimulating the total number of soil microorganisms, but the number of hydrocarbon-oxidizing microorganisms, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degraders, was larger in the root zone of alfalfa. In turn, yellow medick provided a favorable balance of available nitrogen. Both Medicago species equally stimulated the dehydrogenase and peroxidase activities of the soil, and yellow medick increased the activity of soil polyphenol oxidase but reduced the activity of catalase. The root tissue activity of catalase, ascorbate oxidase, and tyrosinase was grater in alfalfa than in yellow medick. The peroxidase activity of plant roots was similar in both species, but nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed some differences in the peroxidase profiles of the root extracts of alfalfa and yellow medick. Overall, this study suggests that the phytoremediation potentials of yellow medick and alfalfa are similar, with some differences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achuba FI, Okoh PN (2014) Effect of petroleum products on soil catalase and dehydrogenase. Open Journal of Soil Science 4:399–406. doi:10.4236/ojss.2014.412040 Accessed 11 November 2015
Adam G, Duncan HJ (1999) Effect of diesel fuel on growth of selected plant species. Environ Geochem Hlth 21:353–357. doi:10.1023/A:1006744603461
Aebi H (1984) Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 105:121–126. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3
Atlas RM (1981) Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons: an environmental perspective. Microbiol Rev 45:180–209
Bartha R, Bordeleau L (1969) Cell-free peroxidases in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 1:139–143. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(69)90004-2
Basumatary B, Saikia R, Das HC, Bordoloi S (2013) Field note: phytoremediation of petroleum sludge contaminated field using sedge species, Cyperus rotundus (Linn.) and Cyperus brevifolius (Rottb.) Hassk. Int J Phytoremediat 15:877–888. doi:10.1080/15226514.2012.760520
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
Bushnell LD, Haas HF (1941) The utilization of certain hydrocarbons by microorganisms. J Bacteriol 5:653–674
Criquet S, Joner E, Leglize P, Leyval C (2000) Anthracene and mycorhiza affect the activity of oxidoreductases in the roots and the rhizosphere of lucerne (Medicago saliva L.). Biotechnol Lett 22:1733–1737. doi:10.1023/A:1005604719909
Di Toro DM, McGrath JA, Stubblefield WA (2007) Predicting the toxicity of neat and weathered crude oil: toxic potential and the toxicity of saturated mixtures. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:24–36. doi:10.1897/06174R.1
Dominguez-Rosado E, Pitchel J (2004) Phytoremediation of soil contaminated with used motor oil: II. Greenhouse studies. Environ Eng Sci 21:169–180
Escalante-Espinosa E, Gallegos-Martínez ME, Favela-Torees E, Gutiérrez-Rojas M (2005) Improvement of the hydrocarbon phytoremediation rate by Cyperus laxus Lam. Inoculated with a microbial consortium in a model system. Chemosphere 59:405–413. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.034
Ferrera-Cerrato R, Alarcon A, Mendoza-Lopez MR, Sangabriel W, Trejo-Aguilar D, Cruz-Sanchez JS, Lopez-Ortiz C, Delgadillo-Martinez J (2007) Phytoremediation of a fuel oil-polluted soil with Phaseolus coccineus using organic or inorganic fertilization. Agrociencia 41:817–826
Frick CM, Farrell RE, Germida JJ (1999) Assessment of phytoremediation as an in-situ technique for cleaning oil-contaminated sites. https://clu-in.org/download/remed/phyassess.pdf Accessed 20 May 2016
Golubev SN, Schelud’ko AV, Muratova AY, Makarov OE, Turkovskaya OV (2009) Assessing the potential of rhizobacteria to survive under phenanthrene pollution. Water Air Soil Pollut 198:5–16. doi:10.1007/s11270-008-9821-x
GOST 26205-91 Determination of mobile compounds of phosphorus and potassium by Chiricov method modified by CINAO. Soils. http://gostexpert.ru/gost/getDoc/38501. (In Russian) Accessed 20 May 2016
GOST 26488-85 Determination of nitrates by СINАО method. Soils. http://gostexpert.ru/gost/getDoc/39049. (In Russian) Accessed 20 May 2016
GOST 26489-85 Determination of exchangeable ammonium by СINАО method. Soils. http://gostexpert.ru/gost/getDoc/39051. (In Russian) Accessed 20 May 2016
Hall J, Soole K, Bentham R (2011) Hydrocarbon phytoremediation in the family Fabaceae—a review. Int J Phytoremediat 13:317–332. doi:10.1080/15226514.2010.495143
Hutchinson SL, Banks MK, Schwab AP (2001) Phytoremediation of aged petroleum sludge: effect of inorganic fertilizer. J Environ Qual 30:395–403. doi:10.2134/jeq2001.302395x
Kaimi E, Mukaidani T, Tamaki M (2007) Screening of twelve plant species for phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Plant Prod Sci 10:211–218. doi:10.1626/pps.10.211
Kechavarzi C, Pettersson K, Leeds-Harrison P, Ritchie L, Ledin S (2007) Root establishment of perennial ryegrass (L. perenne) in diesel contaminated subsurface soil layers. Environ Poll 145:68–74. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2006.03.039
Kirk JL, Klironomos JN, Lee H, Trevors JT (2005) The effects of perennial ryegrass and alfalfa on microbial abundance and diversity in petroleum contaminated soil. Environ Poll 133:455–465. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2004.06.002
Kirkpatrick WD, White PM Jr, Wolf DC, Thoma GJ, Reynolds CM (2009) Selecting plants and nitrogen rates to vegetate crude-oil-contaminated soil. Int J Phytoremediat 8:285–297. doi:10.1080/15226510600992840
Kiyohara H, Nagao K, Yana K (1982) Rapid screen for bacteria degrading water-insoluble, soil hydrocarbons on agar plates. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:454–457
Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural protein during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage. Nature 227:680–685. doi:10.1038/227680a0
Leonowicz A, Grzywnowicz K (1981) Quantitative estimation of laccase forms in some white-rot fungi using syringaldazine as a substrate. Enzym Microb Technol 3:55–58. doi:10.1016/0141-0229(81)90036-3
Liste HH, Felgentreu D (2006) Crop growth, culturable bacteria, and degradation of petrol hydrocarbons (PHCs) in a long-term contaminated field soil. Appl Soil Ecol 31:43–52. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.04.006
Lupashku MF (1988) Lucerna (Lucerne). Moscow, Agropromizdat (In Russian)
Merkl N, Schultze-Kraft R, Infante C (2005) Assessment of tropical grasses and legumes for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 165:195–209. doi:10.1007/s11270-005-4979-y
Muratova AY, Dmitrieva TV, Panchenko LV, Turkovskaya OV (2008) Phytoremediation of oil-sludge-contaminated soil. Int J Phytoremediat 10:486–502. doi:10.1080/15226510802114920
Muratova A, Lyubun Y, German K, Turkovskaya O (2015a) Effect of cadmium stress and inoculation with a heavy-metal-resistant bacterium on the growth and enzyme activity of Sorghum bicolor. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:16098–16109. doi:10.1007/s11356-015-4798-7
Muratova A, Dubrovskaya E, Golubev S, Grinev V, Chernyshova M, Turkovskaya O (2015b) The coupling of the plant and microbial catabolisms of phenanthrene in the rhizosphere of Medicago sativa. J Plant Physiol 188:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2015.07.014
Nichols TD, Wolf DC, Rogers HB, Beyrouty CA, Reynolds CM (1997) Rhizosphere microbial populations in contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 95:165–178. doi:10.1007/BF02406163
Nanekar S, Dhote M, Kashyap S, Singh SK, Juwarkar AA (2015) Microbe assisted phytoremediation of oil sludge and role of amendments: a mesocosm study. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:193–202. doi:10.1007/s13762-013-0400-3
Pakharkova N.V., Prudnikova S.V., Gekk A.S., Larkova A.N., Korosteleva N.S. (2015) Optimization of plant choice for bioremediation of soils contaminated with oil and oil products in the South Siberia conditions. Bulletin of KrasGAU 8: 28–32. (In Russian, abstract in English).
Panchenko L, Turkovskaya O, Volkov M, Muratova A, Dubrovskaya Y, Pleshakova Y, Pozdnyakova N (2002) Large-scale in situ bioremediation of oil-slime. In: Hupka J (ed) Proceedings of 3rd International Conference Oil Pollution: Prevention, Characterization, Clean Technology. 8–11 September 2002, Gdansk, Poland, Volume 1.Gdansk, pp 9–16.
Peterson TA, Russelle MP (1991) Alfalfa and the nitrogen cycle in the Corn Belt. J Soil Water Conserv 46:229–235
Phillips L, Greer CW, Germida JJ (2006) Culture-based and culture-independent assessment of the impact of mixed and single plant treatments on rhizosphere microbial communities in hydrocarbon contaminated flare-pit soil. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2823–2833. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.04.038
Phillips LA, Greer CW, Farrell RE, Germida JJ (2009) Field-scale assessment of weathered hydrocarbon degradation by mixed and single plant treatment. Appl Soil Ecol 42:9–17. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.01.002
RD 39-00147105-006-97 Guidelines for the remediation of lands disturbed and contaminated during emergency repair and overhaul of petroleum trunk pipelines. http://meganorm.ru/Data2/1/4294846/4294846786.htm. Accessed 20 May 2016
Schwab P, Banks MK, Kyle WA (2006) Heritability of phytoremediation potential for the alfalfa cultivar Riley in petroleum contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 177:239–249. doi:10.1007/s11270-006-9161-7
Sengupta-Gopalan C, Bagga S, Potenza C, Ortega JL (2007) Alfalfa. In: Pua EC, Davey MR (eds) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, Transgenic Crops VI, vol 61. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 321–335
Soleimani M, Afyuni M, Hajabbasi MA, Nourbakhsh F, Sabzalian M, Christensen JH (2010) Phytoremediation of an aged petroleum contaminated soil using endophyte infected and non-infected grasses. Chemosphere 81:1084–1090. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.034
Sverdrup LE, Nielsen T, Krogh PH (2002) Soil ecotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in relation to soil sorption, lipophilicity, and water solubility. Environ Sci Technol 36:2429–2435. doi:10.1021/es010180s
Tang J, Wang R, Niu X, Zhou Q (2010) Enhancement of soil petroleum remediation by using a combination of ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and different microorganisms. Soil Till Res 110:87–93. doi:10.1016/j.still.2010.06.010
Tang J, Lu X, Sun Q, Zhu W (2012) Aging effect of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil under different attenuation conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 149:109–117. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.020
Wang J, Zhang Z, Su Y, He W, He F, Song H (2008) Phytoremediation of petroleum polluted soil. Petrol Sci 5:167–171. doi:10.1007/s12182-008-0026-0
Yavari S, Malakahmad A, Sapari NB (2015) A review on phytoremediation of crude oil spills. Water Air Soil Pollut 226:262–278. doi:10.1007/s11270-015-2550-z
Zhang Z, Zhou Q, Peng S, Cai Z (2010) Remediation of petroleum contaminated soils by joint action of Pharbitis nil L. and its microbial community. Sci Total Environ 408:5600–5605. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.003
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Scientific Production Association “Ecosphere” Ltd. We thank our colleagues Drs. Ekaterina Dubrovskaya and Sergey Golubev (Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, IBPPM RAS) for their help in the analyses of the samples taken from the inspected area of the Saratov Petroleum Refinery.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Elena Maestri
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panchenko, L., Muratova, A. & Turkovskaya, O. Comparison of the phytoremediation potentials of Medicago falcata L. And Medicago sativa L. in aged oil-sludge-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 3117–3130 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8025-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8025-y