Abstract
Contact, singular-field, and large-deformation numerical analyses were performed to re-examine the correlation between hardness and tensile properties. Materials have single hardness values, but continuous changes in stress-strain diagrams; it is impossible, in principle, to correlate the hardness to one stress-strain value. Therefore, there must exist an application limit, which is discussed in this study. Because discretization error is unavoidable in such analyses, a method for leveling the discretization error regardless of the analysis condition was introduced. Moreover, in order to generalize the analysis results, the stress-strain diagram used for this analysis was considered as a dimensionless expression in arranging the results. From the analytical results, the following conclusions were deduced. The range in which the empirical equation between hardness and tensile strength is applicable depends on only the value of the work hardening exponent. Moreover, for the 0.05–0.2 range of the work hardening exponent for general steel, the prediction of tensile strength from the hardness is possible with 10% error at indenter face angles between 110° and 136° in case of the wedge indentation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tabor D (1956) The physical meaning of indentation and scratch hardness. Br J Appl Phys 7(5):159–166. doi:10.1088/0508-3443/7/5/301
Pavlina EJ, Van Tyne CJ (2008) Correlation of yield strength and tensile strength with hardness for steels. J Mater Eng Perform 17(6):888–893. doi:10.1007/s11665-008-9225-5
Brooks I, Lin P, Palumbo G, Hibbard GD, Erb U (2008) Analysis of hardness–tensile strength relationships for electroformed nanocrystalline materials. Mater Sci Engng A 491(1–2):412–419. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2008.02.015
Boyer HE, Gall TL (1985) Metals Handbook, Desk edn. ASM International, Metals Park, Ohio
Ashby MF, Jones DRH (2012) Engineering materials 1: an introduction to properties, applications and design. Elsevier, Oxford
Tabor D (1948) A simple theory of static and dynamic hardness. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 192(1029):247–274. doi:10.1098/rspa.1948.0008
Tabor D (1951a) The hardness and strength of metals. J Inst Met 79(7):1–18
Tabor D (1951b) The hardness of metals. Monographs on the physics and chemistry of materials. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Cahoon JR, Broughton WH, Kutzak AR (1971) The determination of yield strength from hardness measurements. Metall Trans A 2(7):1979–1983. doi:10.1007/BF02913433
Cahoon JR (1972) An improved equation relating hardness to ultimate strength. Metall Trans A 3(11):3040. doi:10.1007/BF02652880
Johnson KL (1970) The correlation of indentation experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 18(2):115–126. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-3
Giannakopoulos AE, Larsson PL, Vestergaard R (1994) Analysis of Vickers indentation. Int J Solids Struct 31(19):2679–2708. doi:10.1016/0020-7683(94)90225-9
Larsson P-L (2001) Investigation of sharp contact at rigid–plastic conditions. Int J Mech Sci 43(4):895–920. doi:10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00056-4
Mata M, Anglada M, Alcalá J (2002) Contact deformation regimes around sharp indentations and the concept of the characteristic strain. J Mater Res 17(05):964–976. doi:10.1557/JMR.2002.0144
Ogasawara N, Chiba N, Chen X (2005) Representative strain of indentation analysis. J Mater Res 20(08):2225–2234. doi:10.1557/JMR.2005.0280
Cao Y, Huber N (2006) Further investigation on the definition of the representative strain in conical indentation. J Mater Res 21(07):1810–1821. doi:10.1557/jmr.2006.0224
Jayadevan KR, Narasimhan R (1995) Finite element simulation of wedge indentation. Comput Struct 57(5):915–927. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(94)00557-J
Jayaraman S, Hahn GT, Oliver WC, Rubin CA, Bastias PC (1998) Determination of monotonic stress-strain curve of hard materials from ultra-low-load indentation tests. Int J Solids Struct 35(5–6):365–381
Tekkaya AE, Lange K (2000) An improved relationship between Vickers hardness and yield stress for cold formed materials and its experimental verification. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 49(1):205–208. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62929-1
Tekkaya AE (2001) Improved relationship between Vickers hardness and yield stress for cold formed materials. Steel Research 72(8):304–310
Antunes JM, Menezes LF, Fernandes JV (2006) Three-dimensional numerical simulation of Vickers indentation tests. Int J Solids Struct 43(3–4):784–806. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.02.048
Saito Y, Oztop MS, Kysar JW (2012) Wedge indentation into elastic–plastic single crystals. 2: simulations for face-centered cubic crystals. Int J Plast 28(1):70–87. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.013
Dahlberg CFO, Saito Y, Öztop MS, Kysar JW (2014) Geometrically necessary dislocation density measurements associated with different angles of indentations. Int J Plast 54:81–95. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.08.008
Dieter GE (1988) Mechanical metallurgy. McGraw-hill series in materials science and engineering. SI metric ed. / adapted by David Bacon edn, McGraw-Hill Book Company, London
Chakrabarty J (2006) Theory of plasticity, Third edn. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Hill R, Lee EH, Tupper SJ (1947) The theory of wedge indentation of ductile materials. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 188(1013):273–289. doi:10.1098/rspa.1947.0009
Hill R (1950) The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford University Press Inc., New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamada, S., Nakanishi, M., Moriyama, T. et al. Re-Examination of Correlation between Hardness and Tensile Properties by Numerical Analysis. Exp Mech 57, 773–781 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-017-0272-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-017-0272-4