Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical Testing of Solid–Solid Interfaces at the Microscale

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to determine the influence of internal interfaces on the material’s global mechanical behavior, the strength of single interfaces is of great interest. The experimental framework presented here enables quantitative measurements of the initiation and propagation of interfacial cracks on the microscale. Cantilever beams are fabricated by focused ion beam milling out of a bulk sample, with an interface of interest placed close to the fixed end of the cantilever. Additionally, a U-notch is fabricated at the location of the interface to serve as a stress concentrator for the initiation of the crack. The cantilevers are then mechanically deflected using a nanoindentation system for high resolution load-displacement measurements. In order to determine the onset and propagation of damage, the stiffness of the cantilevers is recorded by partial unloads during the test as well as by making use of a continuous stiffness technique. A finite element model is used to normalize the load and stiffness in order to establish the framework for comparisons between different interfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watanabe T, Tsurekawa S (1999) The control of brittleness and development of desirable mechanical properties in polycrystalline systems by grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater 47:4171–4185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Madhukar MS, Drzal LT (1991) Fiber-matrix adhesion and its effect on composite mechanical properties: I. Inplane and interlaminar shear behavior of graphite/epoxy composites. J Compos Mater 25:932–957

    Google Scholar 

  3. Uchic MD, Dimiduk DM, Florando JN, Nix WD (2004) Sample dimensions influence strength and crystal plasticity. Science 305:986–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. LaVan DA, Sharpe WN (1999) Tensile testing of microsamples. Exp Mech 39:210–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kiener D, Grosinger W, Dehm G, Pippan R (2008) A further step towards an understanding of size-dependent crystal plasticity: In situ tension experiments of miniaturized single-crystal copper samples. Acta Mater 56:580–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Florando JN, Nix WD (2005) A microbeam bending method for studying stress-strain relations for metal thin films on silicon substrates. J Mech Phys Solids 53:619–638

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Halford TP, Takashima K, Higo Y, Bowen P (2005) Fracture test of microsized TiAl specimens. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 28:695–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishida M, Matsuda M, Shimada Y, Takashima K, Ishikawa K, Aoki K (2009) Microstructural and mechanical characterizations of rapidly solidified Nb-TiNi hydrogen permeation alloy. J Phys Conf Ser 144:012106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matoy K, Schönherr H, Detzel T, Schöberl T, Pippan R, Motz C, Dehm G (2009) A comparative micro-cantilever study of the mechanical behavior of silicon based passivation films. Thin Solid Films 518:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Armstrong DEJ, Rogers ME, Roberts SG (2009) Micromechanical testing of stress corrosion cracking of individual grain boundaries. Scr Mater 61:741–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness, ASTM E1820 (2008) Annual book of ASTM standards, vol 03.01, pp 1070–1117

  12. Vasudevan AK, Doherty RD (1987) Grain boundary ductile fracture in precipitation hardened aluminum alloys. Acta Metallurg 35:1193–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalyanam S, Beaudoin AJ, Dodds RH, Barlat F (2009) Delamination cracking in advanced aluminum-lithium alloys—experimental and computational studies. Eng Fract Mech 76:2174–2191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ren L, Bahr DF, Hoagland RG (2000) Multiscale phenomena in materials—experiments and modeling, MRS proceedings. In: Lassila DH, Robertson IM, Phillips R, Devincre B (eds) Mater Res Soc Symp Proc, Warrendale, PA, vol 578, pp 411–416

  15. Unocic KA, Mills MJ, Daehn GS (2010) Effect of gallium focussed ion beam milling on preparation of aluminum thin foils. J Microsc 240:227–238. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03401.x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lynch SP (1989) Mechanisms of intergranular fracture. Mater Sci Forum 46:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7:1564–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li JCM, Chou YT (1970) The role of dislocations in the flow stress grain size relationships. Metall Trans 1:1145– 1159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Kupka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kupka, D., Lilleodden, E.T. Mechanical Testing of Solid–Solid Interfaces at the Microscale. Exp Mech 52, 649–658 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9530-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9530-z

Keywords

Navigation