Skip to main content
Log in

Specific Amyloid Binding of Polybasic Peptides In Vivo Is Retained by β-Sheet Conformers but Lost in the Disrupted Coil and All D-Amino Acid Variants

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Molecular Imaging and Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The heparin-reactive, helical peptide p5 is an effective amyloid imaging agent in mice with systemic amyloidosis. Analogs of p5 with modified secondary structure characteristics exhibited altered binding to heparin, synthetic amyloid fibrils, and amyloid extracts in vitro. Herein, we further study the effects of peptide helicity and chirality on specific amyloid binding using a mouse model of systemic inflammation-associated (AA) amyloidosis.

Procedures

Peptides with disrupted helical structure [p5(coil) and p5(Pro3)], with an extended sheet conformation [p5(sheet)] or an all-D enantiomer [p5(D)], were chemically synthesized, radioiodinated, and their biodistribution studied in WT mice as well as transgenic animals with severe systemic AA amyloidosis. Peptide binding was assessed qualitatively by using small animal single-photon emission computed tomography/x-ray computed tomography imaging and microautoradiography and quantitatively using tissue counting.

Results

Peptides with reduced helical propensity, p5(coil) and p5(Pro3), exhibited significantly reduced binding to AA amyloid-laden organs. In contrast, peptide p5(D) was retained by non-amyloid-related ligands in the liver and kidneys of both WT and AA mice, but it also bound AA amyloid in the spleen. The p5(sheet) peptide specifically bound AA amyloid in vivo and was not retained by healthy tissues in WT animals.

Conclusions

Modification of amyloid-targeting peptides using D-amino acids should be performed cautiously due to the introduction of unexpected secondary pharmacologic effects. Peptides that adopt a helical structure, to align charged amino acid side chains along one face, exhibit specific reactivity with amyloid; however, polybasic peptides with a propensity for β-sheet conformation are also amyloid-reactive and may yield a novel class of amyloid-targeting agents for imaging and therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AA:

Inflammation-associated amyloidosis

SPECT:

Single-photon emission computed tomography

CT:

x-ray computed tomography

ARG:

Microautoradiography

%ID/g:

Percent injected dose per gram of tissue

CR:

Congo red

References

  1. Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN (2015) Systemic amyloidosis. Lancet 387:2641–2654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindahl B, Lindahl U (1997) Amyloid-specific heparan sulfate from human liver and spleen. J Biol Chem 272:26091–26094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wall JS, Martin EB, Richey T et al (2015) Preclinical validation of the heparin-reactive peptide p5 + 14 as a molecular imaging agent for visceral amyloidosis. Molecules 20:7657–7682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Smits NC, Kurup S, Rops AL et al (2010) The heparan sulfate motif (GlcNS6S-IdoA2S)3, common in heparin, has a strict topography and is involved in cell behavior and disease. J Biol Chem 285:41143–41151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wall JS, Richey T, Stuckey A et al (2012) SPECT imaging of peripheral amyloid in mice by targeting hyper-sulfated heparan sulfate proteoglycans with specific scFv antibodies. Nucl Med Biol 39:65–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin EB, Williams A, Richey T et al (2016) Comparative evaluation of p5 + 14 with SAP and peptide p5 by dual-energy SPECT imaging of mice with AA amyloidosis. Sci Rep 6:22695. doi:10.1038/srep22695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wall JS, Richey T, Stuckey A, Donnell R, Macy S, Martin EB, Williams A, Higuchi K, Kennel SJ (2011) In vivo molecular imaging of peripheral amyloidosis using heparin-binding peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:E586–E594

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wall JS, Richey T, Williams A et al (2012) Comparative analysis of peptide p5 and serum amyloid P component for imaging AA amyloid in mice using dual-isotope SPECT. Mol Imaging Biol 14:402–407

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wall JS, Williams A, Richey T et al (2013) A binding-site barrier affects imaging efficiency of high affinity amyloid-reactive peptide radiotracers in vivo. PLoS One 8:e66181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin EB, Williams A, Heidel E et al (2013) Peptide p5 binds both heparinase-sensitive glycosaminoglycans and fibrils in patient-derived AL amyloid extracts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 436:85–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jayaraman G, Wu CW, Liu YJ et al (2000) Binding of a de novo designed peptide to specific glycosaminoglycans. FEBS Lett 482:154–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rullo A, Nitz M (2010) Importance of the spatial display of charged residues in heparin-peptide interactions. Biopolymers 93:290–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wall J, Williams A, Wooliver C et al (2016) Secondary structure propensity and chirality of the amyloidophilic peptide p5 and its analogues impacts ligand binding—in vitro characterization. Biochem Biophys Rep 8:89–99

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y (2010) I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc 5:725–738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y (2008) I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9:40. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Munoz V, Serrano L (1997) Development of the multiple sequence approximation within the AGADIR model of alpha-helix formation: comparison with Zimm-Bragg and Lifson-Roig formalisms. Biopolymers 41:495–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Solomon A, Weiss DT, Schell M et al (1999) Transgenic mouse model of AA amyloidosis. Am J Pathol 154:1267–1272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wall JS, Richey T, Allen A et al (2008) Quantitative tomography of early-onset spontaneous AA amyloidosis in interleukin 6 transgenic mice. Comp Med 58:542–550

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Magota K, Kubo N, Kuge Y et al (2011) Performance characterization of the Inveon preclinical small-animal PET/SPECT/CT system for multimodality imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:742–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ogawa K (1994) Simulation study of triple-energy-window scatter correction in combined Tl-201, Tc-99 m SPECT. Ann Nucl Med 8:277–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Feldkamp L, Davis L, Kress J (1984) Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am 1:612–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin EB, Kennel SJ, Richey T et al (2014) Dynamic PET and SPECT imaging with radioiodinated, amyloid-reactive peptide p5 in mice: a positive role for peptide dehalogenation. Peptides 60:63–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Di L (2015) Strategic approaches to optimizing peptide ADME properties. AAPS J 17:134–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harris AG (1994) Somatostatin and somatostatin analogues: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects. Gut 35:S1–S4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Li C, Zhan C, Zhao L et al (2013) Functional consequences of retro-inverso isomerization of a miniature protein inhibitor of the p53-MDM2 interaction. Bioorg Med Chem 21:4045–4050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Araujo RL, Carvalho DP (2011) Bioenergetic impact of tissue-specific regulation of iodothyronine deiodinases during nutritional imbalance. J Bioenerg Biomembr 43:59–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wall J, Martin E, Donnell R, Richey T, Stuckey A, Kennel SJ (2014) Heparin-binding peptides, basic fibroblast growth factor and p5R, bind to different targets in amyloid-laden mice and controls. In: Kluve-Beckerman B, Liepnieks J, Benson M (eds) The XIVth International Symposium on Amyloidosis, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Amyloid: Insoluble, but Solvable. pp 284–287

  28. Pace CN, Scholtz JM (1998) A helix propensity scale based on experimental studies of peptides and proteins. Biophys J 75:422–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by PHS grant R01DK079984 from The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), as well as funds from the Molecular Imaging and Translational Research Program and the Department of Medicine at UTMC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan S. Wall.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

JSW and SJK are inventors on patent applications that describe the use of polybasic peptides for the detection and treatment of amyloidosis. JSW, TR, AS, EBM, and SJK are founders and co-owners of Solex, LLC that sub-licensed intellectual property related to amyloid reactive peptides.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wall, J.S., Williams, A., Richey, T. et al. Specific Amyloid Binding of Polybasic Peptides In Vivo Is Retained by β-Sheet Conformers but Lost in the Disrupted Coil and All D-Amino Acid Variants. Mol Imaging Biol 19, 714–722 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-017-1063-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-017-1063-0

Key words

Navigation